Hi List,
In case any of you are wondering when RHEL5.6 will be out our satellite server has just pulled down a copy (with bind97 and php53 :) so I'd expect an official announcement fairly soon.
Tris
************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster@bgfl.org
The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation *************************************************************
On 01/13/2011 05:01 PM, Tris Hoar wrote:
Hi List,
In case any of you are wondering when RHEL5.6 will be out our satellite server has just pulled down a copy (with bind97 and php53 :) so I'd expect an official announcement fairly soon.
And they have just updated the kernel RHSA-2011:0017-01 [1]
I've noticed that some php53 sub-package are not packaged such as php-mcrypt ... etc, at least CentOS-Testing repo have full php-5.2.x stack.
[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0017.html
Best regards.
Athmane Madjoudj writes:
On 01/13/2011 05:01 PM, Tris Hoar wrote:
Hi List,
In case any of you are wondering when RHEL5.6 will be out our satellite server has just pulled down a copy (with bind97 and php53 :) so I'd expect an official announcement fairly soon.
And they have just updated the kernel RHSA-2011:0017-01 [1]
I've noticed that some php53 sub-package are not packaged such as php-mcrypt ... etc, at least CentOS-Testing repo have full php-5.2.x stack.
More packages will be provided by the Extras repo I believe.
[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0017.html
Best regards.
-- Athmane Madjoudj _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2011/1/13 nux@li.nux.ro:
Athmane Madjoudj writes:
On 01/13/2011 05:01 PM, Tris Hoar wrote:
Hi List,
In case any of you are wondering when RHEL5.6 will be out our satellite server has just pulled down a copy (with bind97 and php53 :) so I'd expect an official announcement fairly soon.
And they have just updated the kernel RHSA-2011:0017-01 [1]
I've noticed that some php53 sub-package are not packaged such as php-mcrypt ... etc, at least CentOS-Testing repo have full php-5.2.x stack.
More packages will be provided by the Extras repo I believe.
http://press.redhat.com/2011/01/13/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-6-now-availabl...
-- Eero
guys i wanna a full RHEL iso not beta,where from?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.volotinen@iki.fiwrote:
2011/1/13 nux@li.nux.ro:
Athmane Madjoudj writes:
On 01/13/2011 05:01 PM, Tris Hoar wrote:
Hi List,
In case any of you are wondering when RHEL5.6 will be out our satellite server has just pulled down a copy (with bind97 and php53 :) so I'd expect an official announcement fairly soon.
And they have just updated the kernel RHSA-2011:0017-01 [1]
I've noticed that some php53 sub-package are not packaged such as php-mcrypt ... etc, at least CentOS-Testing repo have full php-5.2.x
stack.
More packages will be provided by the Extras repo I believe.
http://press.redhat.com/2011/01/13/red-hat-enterprise-linux-5-6-now-availabl...
-- Eero _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 13.01.2011, at 21:47, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You can download the ISO's from rhn.redhat.com.
Considering he only found the Beta, I think it is likely that he does not have an account with rhn. :)
Gruß/Regards, Daniel Heitmann
gpg id: B251006E | ascii: http://horrendum.de/gpg.asc | twitter: @dictvm xmmp: maledictvm@jabber.ccc.de | otr-fingerprint: http://horrendum.de/otr.txt
Proprietary attachments instantly go to /dev/null.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." - George Orwell
2011/1/13 Daniel Heitmann dh@horrendum.de:
On 13.01.2011, at 21:47, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You can download the ISO's from rhn.redhat.com.
Considering he only found the Beta, I think it is likely that he does not have an account with rhn. :)
problem solving with visa card? :)
-- Eero
no i get an account but it only offer me the beta`s iso`s?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.volotinen@iki.fiwrote:
2011/1/13 Daniel Heitmann dh@horrendum.de:
On 13.01.2011, at 21:47, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You can download the ISO's from rhn.redhat.com.
Considering he only found the Beta, I think it is likely that he does not
have an account with rhn. :)
problem solving with visa card? :)
-- Eero _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and i wanna know what is the diferrence between the rhel and the rhel server editions
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:30 PM, mahmoud mansy jecko617@gmail.com wrote:
no i get an account but it only offer me the beta`s iso`s?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.volotinen@iki.fiwrote:
2011/1/13 Daniel Heitmann dh@horrendum.de:
On 13.01.2011, at 21:47, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You can download the ISO's from rhn.redhat.com.
Considering he only found the Beta, I think it is likely that he does
not have an account with rhn. :)
problem solving with visa card? :)
-- Eero _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:31:20PM +0200, mahmoud mansy wrote:
and i wanna know what is the diferrence between the rhel and the rhel server editions
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
Ray
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
Gruß/Regards, Daniel Heitmann
gpg id: B251006E | ascii: http://horrendum.de/gpg.asc | twitter: @dictvm xmmp: maledictvm@jabber.ccc.de | otr-fingerprint: http://horrendum.de/otr.txt
Proprietary attachments instantly go to /dev/null.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." - George Orwell
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
Heh. As opposed to Sun, er, Oracle tech support, where when I have to call them, it's more along the lines of self-abuse.
mark, and the system seems to be running ok after a *month* of go-rounds, thank you for asking....
guys i am preparing muself to take the RHCE self study way and i wanna know what is the best OS (fedora 14 or centos 5.5) and in the same time i wanna it to be a general usage OS
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
Heh. As opposed to Sun, er, Oracle tech support, where when I have to call them, it's more along the lines of self-abuse.
mark, and the system seems to be running ok after a *month* of go-rounds, thank you for asking....
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 1/14/2011 9:27 AM, mahmoud mansy wrote:
guys i am preparing muself to take the RHCE self study way and i wanna know what is the best OS (fedora 14 or centos 5.5) and in the same time i wanna it to be a general usage OS
Since the RHCE exam is based on RHEL, that would be the best OS to work with. If you don't want to shell out the money for RHEL, then CentOS 5 would be the next choice.
mahmoud mansy writes:
« HTML content follows »
guys i am preparing muself to take the RHCE self study way and i wanna know what is the best OS (fedora 14 or centos 5.5) and in the same time i wanna it to be a general usage OS
You can start by learning how to send emails (try to send in plain text and do not top post please); also start a new message when you change the topic.
-- Nux! www.nux.ro
Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL
announcement?
+1
5.5 broke my machine at home, I don't have a bootable kernel currently (all versions hang starting udev, or hit a kernel panic starting udev). So a 5.6 or 6.0 DVD is the pill I'm waiting for.
WinXP starts on this machine *every* *single* *time* *every* *single* *day* so I don't believe it's a hardware problem. Perhaps a "vendor supplied binary driver" problem (I do have Nvidia chips and video card installed).
Yeah, I'm drooling at the calendar waiting for 5.6 or 6.0! ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
will i didnot changed the topic thus i don`t need to start anew message because this is the topic in first place
will i didnot changed the topic thus i don`t need to start anew message because this is the topic in first place
Changing the subject is not enough, because there are fields in the headers that indicate what other message this message follows, so the messages appear (in the archives) to be chained on the previous subject even though the subject line is different.
Rather than use your mail tool's "reply" button, use the "make a new message" (probably has a different name), copy from the old message ONLY the send-to ADDRESS (centos-bounces@centos.org) and write your all-new message with a new subject. ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
2011/1/14 Brunner, Brian T. BBrunner@gai-tronics.com:
Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL
announcement?
+1
5.5 broke my machine at home, I don't have a bootable kernel currently (all versions hang starting udev, or hit a kernel panic starting udev). So a 5.6 or 6.0 DVD is the pill I'm waiting for.
Please, file bug report to upstream ..
-- Eero
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/1/14 Brunner, Brian T. BBrunner@gai-tronics.com:
Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL
announcement?
No, I think:
These men and women are so awesome, giving up their time to make us a great operating system at no charge. Whether it be a week, a month, or a year after RHEL release, I am so grateful for all of them and the huge amounts of time and effort they *donate* to do all of this!!
And I'll be blunt here: that should be our mindset for ALL of us on this list, and it would accelerate the timetable of new CentOS releases by:
1. Not having Karanbir and others stop and waste their time on snarky comments, endless "when will it be out, I want it NOW!" tirades, and other garbage
2. The development/QA/etc teams will be encouraged as we root them on, timetable be hanged. You want it now? Go to RHEL. Seriously. And, you'll be doing us two favors: you'll stop irritating us, and you'll ensure that we will have a great OS when CentOS has a release.
Sorry, but I'm not in a good mood right now, but I'm tired of people complaining about the slow releases. As for me, I'm very grateful and thankful for what all the *volunteers* do for CentOS. Imperfectly? Sure. That's what patience and grace are for.
Hey devs/QA, etc: keep on rollin', as they say here in the states. Thanks, guys and gals, for all that you do!!!!
Gilbert
******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************
Hey devs/QA, etc: keep on rollin', as they say here in the states. Thanks, guys and gals, for all that you do!!!!
I hope that Centos team can finally fix the donations page, so that people can donate money to project.
+1 ... Err... +$10
-------------------- I hate proprietary attachments! ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
Hey devs/QA, etc: keep on rollin', as they say here in the states. Thanks, guys and gals, for all that you do!!!!
I hope that Centos team can finally fix the donations page, so that people can donate money to project.
+1 ... Err... +$10
Speaking as an upstream developer (*) may I suggest that in the absence of a Centos donations page, folks donate directly to the various OSS applications they use? If you don't have one in mind, the SPI (Software in the Public Interest) is a good place to get informed. The Centos project might even want to explore joining SPI.
* In the interest of fairness, I will refrain from pushing my own project, though we are an SPI member.
There are two system in my disk, windows 7 and fedora core 13 How to use the grub4dos load the window 7 and linux. I donot know how to config the menu list.
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 17:13 +0800, Ganu wrote:
How to use the grub4dos load the window 7 and linux. I donot know how to config the menu list.
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Multiboot-with-GRUB-2.html
On 14/01/11 16:47, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/1/14 Brunner, Brian T.BBrunner@gai-tronics.com:
Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL
announcement?
No, I think:
These men and women are so awesome, giving up their time to make us a great operating system at no charge. Whether it be a week, a month, or a year after RHEL release, I am so grateful for all of them and the huge amounts of time and effort they *donate* to do all of this!!
And I'll be blunt here: that should be our mindset for ALL of us on this list, and it would accelerate the timetable of new CentOS releases by:
- Not having Karanbir and others stop and waste their time on snarky
comments, endless "when will it be out, I want it NOW!" tirades, and other garbage
Seriously, this could be improved by having some better clues on when it would be ready or not. F.ex. they could state on the mailing list will be ready "during March". And towards the end they could say "Early or late March" or in worst case "We need to extend the test period to late April".
That gives some ideas when and can really calm a community down. Not knowing anything is the worst which ever happens. If they don't know, come with some guestimates and correct them during the process.
A more transparent process on what is happening and what the plan is, that is what is really needed in community projects.
<snip/>
Sorry, but I'm not in a good mood right now, but I'm tired of people complaining about the slow releases. As for me, I'm very grateful and thankful for what all the *volunteers* do for CentOS. Imperfectly? Sure. That's what patience and grace are for.
Patience is truly gold. But without having at least some vague ideas when, these complains or questions will *never* stop.
kind regards,
David Sommerseth
On 14/01/2011 15:35, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/1/14 Brunner, Brian T.BBrunner@gai-tronics.com:
Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL
announcement?
+1
5.5 broke my machine at home, I don't have a bootable kernel currently (all versions hang starting udev, or hit a kernel panic starting udev). So a 5.6 or 6.0 DVD is the pill I'm waiting for.
Please, file bug report to upstream ..
See! this is why I love open source! Would you have got a response that quick from M$!? Unless you paid them your first born child?
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
NO! This is a volunteer effort. You cannot expect them to have the newest release out days after it is announced. There is work that needs to be done before they can release the OS as CentOS. They do what they can when they can. After all it s free so why complain?
You could always learn how to help them get the newest release out there if time is such an important issue.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:11:20 -0500 Robert Spangler mlists@zoominternet.net wrote:
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
NO! This is a volunteer effort. You cannot expect them to have the newest release out days after it is announced. There is work that needs to be done before they can release the OS as CentOS. They do what they can when they can. After all it s free so why complain?
You could always learn how to help them get the newest release out there if time is such an important issue.
He did say 'CentOS in three months', and given that as I recall 5.3 to 5.4 took 2 months and 5.4 to 5.5 took about the same amount of time, 3 months hopefully isn't unrealistic? If it is, maybe someone could or should put out a call for more volunteers? Of course 6.0 may end up being more than 3 months after upstream release, but time will tell.
Cia W
On 14/01/2011 16:14, Cia Watson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:11:20 -0500 Robert Spanglermlists@zoominternet.net wrote:
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
NO! This is a volunteer effort. You cannot expect them to have the newest release out days after it is announced. There is work that needs to be done before they can release the OS as CentOS. They do what they can when they can. After all it s free so why complain?
You could always learn how to help them get the newest release out there if time is such an important issue.
He did say 'CentOS in three months', and given that as I recall 5.3 to 5.4 took 2 months and 5.4 to 5.5 took about the same amount of time, 3 months hopefully isn't unrealistic? If it is, maybe someone could or should put out a call for more volunteers? Of course 6.0 may end up being more than 3 months after upstream release, but time will tell.
Cia W
Thank you Cia W :)
On 14/01/2011 15:11, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a money-issue.
I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much faith I have in the CentOS volunteers. Every time I've heard of a RHEL release, I brace myself and think "WooHoo - CentOS in three months!" Is this how other CentOS users feel when they hear a RHEL announcement?
NO! This is a volunteer effort. You cannot expect them to have the newest release out days after it is announced. There is work that needs to be done before they can release the OS as CentOS. They do what they can when they can. After all it s free so why complain?
I have 0 complaints with CentOS - even the complaints I do have are not really complaints, just me being greedy and fickle. CentOS is, for all intents and purposes, an Enterprise grade product, I salute you guys and girls, who work on it.
You could always learn how to help them get the newest release out there if time is such an important issue.
For the record, I do completely understand that this is a volunteer effort, as I am sure many others have done since the beginning. Time to me, is not an important issue, I can wait for the work to be done, but taking into the account the fact that I'm taking, and not giving, I should have taken the stance that you took, and let people know that this is a volunteer effort. That said ...
"WOOHOO - CentOS in three months!"
I am free to be happy that there are people out there who are spending their free time, using their knowledge and expertise just to help me do my job better. I say "Thank You" to the volunteers, you make my life so much easier, and your top class work gives me the confidence to deploy CentOS, not only across all our internal linux machines, but our colo facility as well, *and* all our clients. Thank You again, because of your work, I am able to sleep at night not worrying about new system installs, or anything to do with CentOS actually. Your work is top class!
On 13 Jan 2011, at 21:31, mahmoud mansy jecko617@gmail.com wrote:
but it only offer me the beta`s iso`s?
Suggest you contact RedHat.
Ben
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:00 AM, mahmoud mansy jecko617@gmail.com wrote:
no i get an account but it only offer me the beta`s iso`s?
I guess Redhat support would be proper forum to ask since you have a valid RHN account. Redhat support should be able to point you to correct location for the images.
-- Arun Khan
-
Arun Khan -
Athmane Madjoudj -
Benjamin Donnachie -
Bowie Bailey -
Brunner, Brian T. -
Cia Watson -
Daniel Heitmann -
David Sommerseth -
Eero Volotinen -
Ganu -
Geoff Galitz -
Gilbert Sebenste -
Leonard den Ottolander -
m.roth＠5-cent.us -
mahmoud mansy -
Mister IT Guru -
nux＠li.nux.ro -
Ray Van Dolson -
Robert Spangler -
Tris Hoar