Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html
Alex Lech Bajan Principal RAQport Inc. 2004 North Monroe Street Arlington Virginia 22207 703-528-0114 voice 703-652-0993 voice 2 800-695-6200 toll free sales@raqport.com http://raqport.com
On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote:
Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html
Alex Lech Bajan Principal RAQport Inc. 2004 North Monroe Street Arlington Virginia 22207 703-528-0114 voice 703-652-0993 voice 2 800-695-6200 toll free sales@raqport.com http://raqport.com
Beyond the whole "Streisand effect"[1], you've provided no evidence that these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to have jurisdiction to request the removal, either.
It will ultimately be up to the admins of this list to decide what to remove from the archives, but I must say, you've not made a compelling argument. Perhaps it's an entirely reasonable warning from a couple of unhappy, improperly served former customers.
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Digimer wrote:
On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote:
Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html
Beyond the whole "Streisand effect"[1], you've provided no evidence that these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to have jurisdiction to request the removal, either.
<snip> Furthermore, that's four years old. I haven't bothered to go there, but what assurance would anyone have that it was *not* correct four years ago?
Or is this intended as a prequel to a takedown notice, in which case #insert FLAME_ON.h
mark
m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Digimer wrote:
On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote:
Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html
Beyond the whole "Streisand effect"[1], you've provided no evidence that these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to have jurisdiction to request the removal, either.
<snip> Furthermore, that's four years old. I haven't bothered to go there, but what assurance would anyone have that it was *not* correct four years ago?
Or is this intended as a prequel to a takedown notice, in which case #insert FLAME_ON.h
And, following up my own post, which "formation" were you referring to, a military formation? A rock formation? We don't have enough INformation....
mark "so, did he pass 6th grade English?"
On 09/27/11 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote:
Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/043643.html
you _must_ be kidding.
that is an archive of a 4 year old message that was sent to the many thousands of subscribers of this mail list and is permanently archived on dozens or even 100s of servers around the world that maintain mail list archives. you can't 'unsend' email.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:22 PM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
that is an archive of a 4 year old message that was sent to the many thousands of subscribers of this mail list and is permanently archived on dozens or even 100s of servers around the world that maintain mail list archives. you can't 'unsend' email
Hey some people (in this case me) just like digging up the past (like this -> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-March/020140.html )
Alex,
I believe that there is a bug with what you are trying to do and your english. I would suggest submitting a bug report, but unfortunately I don't believe that even CentOS' best coders and engineers can write a patch for that.
Regards, Christopher Hawker
On 9/28/11, Jim Perrin jperrin@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:22 PM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
that is an archive of a 4 year old message that was sent to the many thousands of subscribers of this mail list and is permanently archived on dozens or even 100s of servers around the world that maintain mail list archives. you can't 'unsend' email
Hey some people (in this case me) just like digging up the past (like this -> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-March/020140.html )
-- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alex Bajan alex@raqport.com wrote:
Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
1. Prove it. 2. You already asked yesterday http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-September/118186.html (see how useful the list archive is for when you need to reference something!) 3. It's a historical account of the list. While I am not a lawyer, I see nothing in there inflammatory, derogatory, or otherwise requiring action. It's simply a 4 year old account from 1 user. You're doing more harm to your brand by dredging up the past than this original post ever did.
-
Alex Bajan -
Christopher Hawker -
Digimer -
Jim Perrin -
John R Pierce -
m.roth＠5-cent.us