Hi Leonard, Had a few issues building x86_64 gcc from upstream rhel6 sources also. I was building using a beta2 workstation install. I was able to build them adding the official i386 beta2 repo, pulling deps with yum-builddep and building with rpmbuild. I've shared them in case you are interested: http://mirror.frameos.org/frameos/6/core/x86_64/Packages/ Hope that helps. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Leonard den Ottolander < leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:57 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > So I built the x86_64 > > version with a plain rpmbuild. For the i686 I used mock. > > On the base system I did forget to install redhat-rpm-config. Even > though this will not make the build fail it does result in a much bigger > glibc-2.12-1.7.el6.x86_64.rpm as compared to the original > glibc-2.12-1.4.el6.x86_64.rpm, even though almost all of the files > inside are identical in size. I suppose the difference in file size is > caused by the lack of brp-compress and the invocation of it after the > build. > > Since the macros file is missing too > %_binary_filedigest_algorithm 8 > is not set when building on the base system. This option sets the > FILEDIGEST checksum to use SHA-256 instead of MD5. Could this be the > cause for rpm not to consider the config and document files from the > x86_64 and i686 glibc rpms to be identical? > > Regards, > Leonard. > > -- > mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- FrameOS Linux website: http://www.frameos.org <http://www.frameos.org> twitter: @rubiojr blog: http://blog.frameos.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20101124/fe8f31b4/attachment-0005.html>