[CentOS-devel] centos-logos legal problem
Kouta Ikematsu
kame55-itasenpara123 at y2.dion.ne.jpThu Dec 8 07:41:17 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] centos-logos legal problem
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Atomic SIG: discussion about kubernetes-node in downstream image
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thank you for reply. On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:06:12 -0800 Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > Is the idea that we want people to be able to copy and redistribute the > package as part of the OS without modifying it? Yes, I think. > Should we have specific language about how it can be used with a rebuild > of CentOS? I.e., if someone modifies the CentOS source (even in just > rebuilding), what should they do with the centos-logos file? I think that require remove or replace centos-logos. (E,g: https://fedorahosted.org/generic-logos/ ) And, I think that require remove or replace "CentOS" trademark. Check CentOS release note section 9. https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7/#head-d58ad86f1b5399bb36755532321b1df4f242a88c Is this is correct ? Thanks. Reference: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ https://www.centos.org/variants/
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] centos-logos legal problem
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Atomic SIG: discussion about kubernetes-node in downstream image
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list