[CentOS-devel] Atomic SIG: discussion about kubernetes-node in downstream image

Julien Pivotto

roidelapluie at inuits.eu
Tue Dec 13 17:18:34 UTC 2016

On 13 Dec 12:12, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> > I want to discuss diverging from RHEL AH by not including the
> > kubernetes-node pkg in our downstream image. This would allow users to
> > install a newer version of the kubernetes-node, such as this 1.4.5
> > version from my copr[3] that I hope to see move into the virt-sig
> > soon.
> Right.  The disadvantage to this is...that people who have masters set
> up for 1.3 will need to use layering or a container for node.
> I'm uncertain, because it seems like a major point of CentOS Core
> builds is fidelity, even bug-for-bug, and this is a major difference.

This is not CentOS core. I think if we can provide something that fits
the user best than upstream, we should to it.

Maybe however we should adopt another name.

> To be clear, you're just talking about -node, not etcd/flannel for example?
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

 (o-    Julien Pivotto
 //\    Config Management SIG
 V_/_   https://frama.link/cfgmgmt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161213/7261c3da/attachment-0004.sig>

More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list