On 15/12/16 00:18, Marcin Dulak wrote: > I'm still thinking there can be something in centos box.ovf that makes it > vulnerable to such changes. > Someone familiar with the specification should be able to comment on this. > In the meantime I created an issue with vagrant: > https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/8105 > Are you getting the correct boot order from centos/7 as described in the > vagrant issue? No, I get the default boot order: boot1="floppy" boot2="dvd" boot3="disk" boot4="none" I see other settings imported correctly by VirtualBox (memory, cpus, storage controllers, network), and it doesn't display any error or warning if I import it manually: $ VBoxManage import ~/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGRANTSLASH-7/1610.01/virtualbox/box.ovf 0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100% Interpreting /Users/laur/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGRANTSLASH-7/1610.01/virtualbox/box.ovf... OK. Disks: vmdisk1 42949672960 -1 http://www.vmware.com/interfaces/specifications/vmdk.html#streamOptimized centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk -1 -1 Virtual system 0: 0: Suggested OS type: "RedHat_64" (change with "--vsys 0 --ostype <type>"; use "list ostypes" to list all possible values) 1: Suggested VM name "centos-7-1-1.x86_64" (change with "--vsys 0 --vmname <name>") 2: Number of CPUs: 1 (change with "--vsys 0 --cpus <n>") 3: Guest memory: 512 MB (change with "--vsys 0 --memory <MB>") 4: Network adapter: orig NAT, config 3, extra type=NAT 5: IDE controller, type PIIX4 (disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 5 --ignore") 6: IDE controller, type PIIX4 (disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 6 --ignore") 7: Hard disk image: source image=centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, target path=/Users/laur/VirtualBox VMs/centos-7-1-1.x86_64/centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, controller=5;channel=0 (change target path with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --disk path"; disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --ignore") 0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100% Successfully imported the appliance. The Debian images don't even bother to specify a boot order, I doubt it makes a difference in practice. But if you think it's important, you can file a bug report against Image Factory (imgfac.org) - such a change would have to be made upstream. Best regards, Laurențiu