On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Laurentiu Pancescu <lpancescu at gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/12/16 00:18, Marcin Dulak wrote: > >> I'm still thinking there can be something in centos box.ovf that makes it >> vulnerable to such changes. >> Someone familiar with the specification should be able to comment on this. >> In the meantime I created an issue with vagrant: >> https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/8105 >> Are you getting the correct boot order from centos/7 as described in the >> vagrant issue? >> > > No, I get the default boot order: > boot1="floppy" > boot2="dvd" > boot3="disk" > boot4="none" > > I see other settings imported correctly by VirtualBox (memory, cpus, > storage controllers, network), and it doesn't display any error or warning > if I import it manually: > > $ VBoxManage import ~/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGR > ANTSLASH-7/1610.01/virtualbox/box.ovf > 0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100% > Interpreting /Users/laur/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGRANTSLASH-7/1610.01/v > irtualbox/box.ovf... > OK. > Disks: > vmdisk1 42949672960 -1 http://www.vmware.com/interfac > es/specifications/vmdk.html#streamOptimized centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk > -1 -1 > > Virtual system 0: > 0: Suggested OS type: "RedHat_64" > (change with "--vsys 0 --ostype <type>"; use "list ostypes" to list > all possible values) > 1: Suggested VM name "centos-7-1-1.x86_64" > (change with "--vsys 0 --vmname <name>") > 2: Number of CPUs: 1 > (change with "--vsys 0 --cpus <n>") > 3: Guest memory: 512 MB > (change with "--vsys 0 --memory <MB>") > 4: Network adapter: orig NAT, config 3, extra type=NAT > 5: IDE controller, type PIIX4 > (disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 5 --ignore") > 6: IDE controller, type PIIX4 > (disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 6 --ignore") > 7: Hard disk image: source image=centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, target > path=/Users/laur/VirtualBox VMs/centos-7-1-1.x86_64/centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, > controller=5;channel=0 > (change target path with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --disk path"; > disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --ignore") > 0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100% > Successfully imported the appliance. > > The Debian images don't even bother to specify a boot order, I doubt it > makes a difference in practice. But if you think it's important, you can > file a bug report against Image Factory (imgfac.org) - such a change > would have to be made upstream. https://github.com/redhat-imaging/imagefactory/issues/393 > > > Best regards, > Laurențiu > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161227/ce863213/attachment-0008.html>