Depending on how the pages are generated you should be able to do links and images no problem with Markdown. But yeah not having to update 2 locations would be nice as well as maintain 2 sites one of which is past EOL. Amy *Amy Marrich* She/Her/Hers Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/> amy at redhat.com Mobile: 954-818-0514 Slack: amarrich IRC: spotz <https://www.redhat.com/> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 8:57 AM aleksander.baranowski via CentOS-devel < centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > The Markdown with static site generator FTW. > > It's: > > - It's easier to contribute > - It's easier to review changes and maintain proper review process > - It's easier to setup > - Deployment/Automation is trivial > > One of the problems that might arise is attachments, like images, YT > links etc, and how to maintain them in a repo. But with proper > documentation and rules, it's manageable. > > Links like "edit this page" that takes you right into the repository and > source are extremely developer friendly and encourage contributions even > for small things. > > The fact that anyone can build/recreate/check changes/experiment locally > is also an important benefit. > > Best, > Alex > > PS. I used my work e-mail, then tried to "unsent" and waited half-hour, > so if this message goes twice on this mailing-list I'm sorry. > > On 8/24/22 15:08, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > Some time ago, we started to suffer from spammers/load/etc against > > wiki.centos.org > > > > We tried to implement various techniques , found on the moin wiki or > > elsewhere but we have to face it : moin (http://moinmo.in/), then > > underlying app for wiki.centos.org, is now unmaintained. Latest version > > (that we run) is python 2.7 compatible but no plan for python 3, etc, etc > > > > For that reason, some SIGs (including Infra SIG), moved already their > > doc to markdown format, easy to write/review through PR and > > automatically rendered. > > > > The question is so : do we want/need to keep wiki.centos.org running ? > > Most of the content (if not almost 99%) is outdated/unmaintained at this > > stage, and deciding what to do about content , and how/where to migrate > > it would make sense. > > > > That's tied to an old infra ticket open a long time ago > > (https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/793) when we had to enabled > > mod_qos, and other workarounds to just try to keep it running and > > functional. > > > > Let's start a thread/discussion ! > > > > @Shaun : as Docs leader, your voice/opinion/feedback would be greatly > > appreciated ;-) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220824/3cd9ecb1/attachment-0003.html>