On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:27 PM Fred <fred.fredex at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm just wondering how (or if) AMD processors map into this issue... The v1, v2, v3 baselines are defined based on the x86_64 instructions available within that family. AMD CPUs certainly fall into this, and you can see an overview here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 > Not just the recent (last several years) CPUs, but earlier ones that implement AMD64, such as the Vishera (which I'm still running). > > Whatever it is doing, Rocky 9 64bit seems to run fine on it, but I wonder how I will fare in the future. As best I can tell, Vishera is a v2 compliant microarchitecture. RHEL 9 has a v2 baseline so Rocky 9 working sounds like what I would expect. The v3 baseline bump would mean that specific CPU won't work with ELN/CentOS Stream 10/RHEL 10. v3 starts with circa 2015 or newer CPU models. josh > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:10 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:03 PM Alex Iribarren <alex.m.lists3 at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Josh, >> > >> > >> > On 3/13/23 17:01, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > > RHEL 10 would retain the v2 baseline that RHEL 9 carries if there was >> > > no change, so that equipment is still out of scope for RHEL usage >> > > regardless. >> > >> > Yes, I wasn't expecting v1 to return for RHEL 10, I'm just wondering if >> > we can give v2 a bit more life. >> >> We plan on moving forward with the v3 baseline change. >> >> josh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel