Thanks Josh! that means that if I wish to move beyond Centos/rocky/rhel/etc. 9 it will be time to upgrade the hardware. Fred On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:16 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:27 PM Fred <fred.fredex at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm just wondering how (or if) AMD processors map into this issue... > > The v1, v2, v3 baselines are defined based on the x86_64 instructions > available within that family. AMD CPUs certainly fall into this, and > you can see an overview here: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 > > > Not just the recent (last several years) CPUs, but earlier ones that > implement AMD64, such as the Vishera (which I'm still running). > > > > Whatever it is doing, Rocky 9 64bit seems to run fine on it, but I > wonder how I will fare in the future. > > As best I can tell, Vishera is a v2 compliant microarchitecture. RHEL > 9 has a v2 baseline so Rocky 9 working sounds like what I would > expect. The v3 baseline bump would mean that specific CPU won't work > with ELN/CentOS Stream 10/RHEL 10. v3 starts with circa 2015 or newer > CPU models. > > josh > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:10 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:03 PM Alex Iribarren < > alex.m.lists3 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Josh, > >> > > >> > > >> > On 3/13/23 17:01, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > > RHEL 10 would retain the v2 baseline that RHEL 9 carries if there > was > >> > > no change, so that equipment is still out of scope for RHEL usage > >> > > regardless. > >> > > >> > Yes, I wasn't expecting v1 to return for RHEL 10, I'm just wondering > if > >> > we can give v2 a bit more life. > >> > >> We plan on moving forward with the v3 baseline change. > >> > >> josh > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS-devel mailing list > >> CentOS-devel at centos.org > >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230316/d0d53637/attachment-0002.html>