[CentOS] Re: centos] Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan

Sun May 29 17:29:59 UTC 2005
Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@ieee.org> <thebs413 at earthlink.net>

From: R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com>
> Bryan - Please don't overstate this and make a problem where 
> none exists.  There is an infinity of choices of which you 
> list three ...
> Nor does one _have_ to 'get involved' with either the 
> RH-Fedora or Centos project to do effective distribution 
> building, or add-on packaging.  There are independent 
> packagers who have packaged for years and years outside of 
> RH's Fedora and its required representations and paperwork to 
> be a committer, outside of Centos.  Tummy, Matthias (pre-his 
> move to RH Fedora Extras), Dag, again my longstanding archive. 
> RPMForge offers a home.

You too my statement out of context.
I was talking about how to affect CentOS _directly_!
I didn't say those were the only ways to help Linux
in general.

Because, after all, the people I have a problem with aren't complaining
about what is or isn't available in the Linux world.  They are complaining
why CentOS doesn't have this, and typically blaming Red Hat.

So given the criteria of CentOS, my 3 major options are pretty much it.

1.  Get involved with Fedora, so things change early
2.  Get involved with CentOS, to help out the additional projects
3.  Or just complain and nothing changes

RHEL is pretty much about what we make in Fedora.
CentOS is pretty much what we add around RHEL.
Complaints don't do anything, they are generally destructive.

And they are even more so a "slap in the face" to those who actually
take the time to be constructive and help out these projects.
If you don't like Red Hat, tell them so in Bugzilla!  They want to _know_
what poeple are having issues with -- they _will_ respond and try
to please. 

--
Bryan J. Smith   mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org