[CentOS] Re: kde-3.5.0(kmail) is slow(er)
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Jan 23 14:43:48 UTC 2006
Lamar Owen wrote:
>> > KDE 3.5 is slower, unfortunately, so you don't want to do this on an
>> > old machine; the machine needs to be recent and needs to have more than
>> > 256MB
...
>> Provided ample RAM, I've personally found kde 3.5 to be subjectively
>> faster (partly due to pkg optimization tweaking).
>
> Kmail for one definitely feels slower, and the startup time IS longer.
...
> it felt slower. Started Kontact/kmail, and it too felt slower, although
OK, I'll give you that kmail is slower. However, I still have to say that
KDE(3.5), in general, is (should be) faster.
-- Rex
More information about the CentOS
mailing list