[CentOS] Centosplus & CentOS Extras, Enlarge your tent
jim_smith2006 at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 11 17:01:19 UTC 2006
--- Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> I am not completely sure that I agree with the above. Sometimes you
> have to break eggs to cook them. Some packaging requires updated
> modules to function...unfortunate but true. If 'upstream' refuses
> certain base packages, then they might have to be replaced by a
> repo to get other packages installed...you takes your chances. Good
> getting things like mythtv installed without updating some of the
> packages...which is why I think (rather unfairly), Axel Thimms gets
> a lot of heat for his repo...because he is actually making edge
> packages work and sometimes he has to break eggs.
Broken eggs? A good example is on the centos list
That is a SURE lot of eggs to break for just mythtv.
> I think the larger issue between Fedora repositories was
> standardization of naming that provided a logical system for one
> evaluate its versioning against another and that seems to have
> out in FC-4 repos.
> > Craig, where is the KDE-Redhat repo, I'm not a fan of KDE but if
> > they have a newer SAMBA, I'll see whether it can quiten the logs.
Arhh i recognize that repo as one of Axel Thims. I wouldn't touch
anything from ATRMS/kde-redhat.sourceforge.net with a barge pole.
On the subject of Fedora since i haven't touched FC4, they may have
ironed out the "repository hell" situation.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the CentOS