[CentOS] SOLVED - Re: Centos7 and old Bind bug

Robert Moskowitz rgm at htt-consult.com
Wed Feb 15 13:56:32 UTC 2017


Thanks Gordon...

On 02/12/2017 03:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 02/12/2017 10:56 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:  >>> It's probably safe to specify some range of higher numbered >>> 
ports: >>> >>> use-v4-udp-ports { range 10240 65535; }; use-v6-udp-ports 
{ range >>> 10240 65535; }; >> >> But that is not the ports that I am 
seeing in logwatch: > > > Yes, I know.  The work-around in the bug 
report specifies which ports > to exclude, but it doesn't include some 
of the ports you saw in your > logs, so it won't solve the problem 
entirely.  If you instead specify > the ports that are allowed, and use 
a higher range of ports, the > work-around should be more reliable.

No more port messages in logwatch.

Now to learn about GeoIP and what all those failures are that show up in 
logwatch!






More information about the CentOS mailing list