you think you can fund something like that with a bake sale or so?, maintaining a separate distro for the same thing is VERY expensive On 4/28/21 2:08 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 28/4/2021 10:35 π.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote: > >> All that, in turn, are very much dependent on community involvement >> and project management & financing. > > By the way, I think that CentOS, before it was "absorbed" by Redhat, > could/might have addressed the community for fund raising, rather than > abandoning the project to RH, which, as others have mentioned, was an > unmistakable sign of upcoming CentOS EOL as we had come to know it. > > If the financing need was communicated correctly, I am very confident > that financing would have been secured, e.g. by using a public fund > raising platform, due to CentOS huge install base and community. > > Any of those current (or future) projects that might prove successful > enough to become CentOS successor (as a RHEL binary twin, and not as > Stream), should use the community financing model, in order to avoid > CentOS fate. > > My 0.01$ :) > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos