On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 03:51 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Is this for the speed to run tests, or are you optimising for speed of > redeployment of duffy nodes ? Both! So...currently it looks like we're provisioning 2G of swap, and the rest XFS / at over 400GB. What I want is to be able to use most of this as tmpfs in some of the workloads. We can do this by tweaking the kickstart to use a smaller / that is configured to auto-grow. One alternative is to mix in some CentOS Atomic Host, which are pre-configured in very similar way. > the PaaS SIG is working towards an openshift origin release, once that > comes through, we definitely want to have a openshift instance in > ci.centos.org infra for folks to consume. Yes. Related to all of this, I'm guessing that a lot of the workloads (probably especially CentOS 6/5) could be moved underneath Docker inside an Atomic/OpenShift cluster, rather than needing a full baremetal node.