Arm-dev

arm-dev@lists.centos.org

686 discussions

Instructions for installation on an Odroid HC1
by Robert Moskowitz 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

The power supply and serial connection came today, so now to build my first image. I see that we are still on the 1804 images, and seem to recall that there was work to do to get that working. Can someone give me the current recommended installation steps? I would prefer that all partitions are on the sata drive, only uboot on the uSD. thanks.

1 1

Odroid-HC1 came, but
by Robert Moskowitz 29 Nov '18

29 Nov '18

got myself an ODroid-HC1, but seems I forgot some things... Power supply! I have a right sized barrel to USB cable, but my Ankar is rated up to 3A and is fused at any draw above that. I remember looking at power supplies before, but can't find the link. UART to USB. The ones I have won't fit. They are for connecting to pins, not a connector like the HC1 has. What do I get? Plus what are the pin-outs? I really need to get a schematic for this... Case cover. For some strange reason, I thought it would come with a cover. I see now, that if you stack them you only need one cover, so it is most likely a separate order. The unit came with a small bag with 2 screws, but I cannot find any holes in the case for any screws! Strange. So after I get at least the power supply and UART to USB for console, I will be asking how to get this to boot completely from the HD like I do with my Cubies! thanks Bob

2 5

back at it
by Robert Moskowitz 22 Nov '18

22 Nov '18

Oct 27th I was the pedestrian in a pedestrian/auto accident. Healing well enough. PT for walking and that should correct in a couple weeks. Dislocated right shoulder and that is the real limiter for the next 4 weeks. Affects my typing and mousing. Plus for the work here, reaching for and doing all I do with my arm boards. Thus I hope now to spend some time on Centos/Fedora arm work, but reduced until the arm is out of the sling. Bob

3 2

Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 14 Nov '18

14 Nov '18

Hi, No errors or misbehavior sofar after updating to php72-7.2.11-1. This for the installed requirements of nextcloud as shown below. Installed from community-SCLs_php72-testing: php72-1.0-1.el7.armv7hl php72-runtime-1.0-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-cli-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-common-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-fpm-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-gd-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-intl-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-json-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-ldap-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-mbstring-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-mysqlnd-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-opcache-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-pdo-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-pear-1.10.5-5.el7.noarch php72-php-process-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-xml-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl Installed (local) SCL's rebuilds: php72-php-smbclient-0.9.0-3.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-zip-1.15.2-1.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-mcrypt-1.0.1-7.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-apcu-5.1.9-1.ns7.armv7hl Mark Verlinde -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Afzender: Pablo Sebastián Greco<pablo(a)fliagreco.com.ar> Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 11:20 Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> Onderwerp: Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 Mark, just removed the wrong build and pushed the right one, it should appear there in a few hours. Thanks for reporting!. Pablo. El 2/11/18 a las 06:51, Mark Verlinde escribió: -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Afzender:Mark Verlinde <mark(a)havak.nl> <mailto:mark@havak.nl> Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 9:16 Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> <mailto:arm-dev@centos.org> Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 Hi, In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. Again, thank you for the effort! We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. Jumped to a wrong conclusion here, sorry for that. The spec in the source package is not converted for a sclo-build. Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? Rephrase: Is it possible to reissue the build from a sclo enabled (remi safe) source package? With the promise we report our findings, Mark Verlinde _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev> _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev> _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev

2 1

Re: [Arm-dev] Kernel 4.19.1
by Mark Verlinde 14 Nov '18

14 Nov '18

Hi, No anomalies on my Orange Pi Plus 2E (SOC: Allwinner H3), Did not check video (HDMI-Out) yet; It did not work with the kernel 4.18.x. Using it headless anyway it did/does not have any prio for me. Mark Verlinde -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Afzender:Pablo Sebastián Greco <pablo(a)fliagreco.com.ar> > Verstuurd: Zaterdag 10 November 2018 12:57 > Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> > Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Kernel 4.19.1 > > > In a few hours, hopefully, there will be a kernel 4.19.1 for armhfp > landing here https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/community-kernel-latest/ > That kernel is almost the same as fedora, with only a few tweaks, but > since it is all very new, please test carefully, and report back. > > Don't say I didn't warn you.... :D > > Pablo. > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >

2 1

kernel source aarch64
by Skorpeo Skorpeo 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hi, If I want to make changes to the config and recompile the kernel where can I get the kernel sources for aarch64? Thanks much!

2 1

Kernel 4.19.1
by Pablo Sebastián Greco 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

In a few hours, hopefully, there will be a kernel 4.19.1 for armhfp landing here https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/community-kernel-latest/ That kernel is almost the same as fedora, with only a few tweaks, but since it is all very new, please test carefully, and report back. Don't say I didn't warn you.... :D Pablo.

1 0

Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 02 Nov '18

02 Nov '18

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Afzender:Mark Verlinde <mark(a)havak.nl> > Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 9:16 > Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> > Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 > > > > Hi, > > In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. > Again, thank you for the effort! > > We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; > Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. > Jumped to a wrong conclusion here, sorry for that. The spec in the source package is not converted for a sclo-build. > Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? Rephrase: Is it possible to reissue the build from a sclo enabled (remi safe) source package? > > With the promise we report our findings, > > Mark Verlinde > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >

2 1

Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 02 Nov '18

02 Nov '18

Hi, In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. Again, thank you for the effort! We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? With the promise we report our findings, Mark Verlinde

1 0

MacchiatoBin support int the Centos7
by Marcin Wojtas 30 Oct '18

30 Oct '18

Hi Jim, Since the newest Centos7 works out-of-the box with the latest MacchiatoBin firmware and also the integrated NICs are supported (beggining from kernel-alt-4.14.0-49.13.1.el7a), can you please shift MacchiatoBin to 'Supported Hardware' section in https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/AArch64 ? Thanks, Marcin

3 3

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
69
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev