There are many ARM machines including the hugely popular Sheva/Guru/Dream Plugs and R-Pi that are < ARMv7. They all meet the spec you list but won't work if the distro is targeting armv7hl.
My lost of ARMv5 hardware is: ShevaPlug GuruPlug DreamPlug QNAP TS-421 (NAS)
All of the above are Marvell Kirkwood based.
ARMv6: VIA APC
ARMv7: Toshiba AC100 (Tegra 2) Compulab TrimSlice (Tegra 2) Samsung Chromebook 1 (Exynos) Cornfed Conserved (iMX6) Solidrun Cubox-i (iMX6?) Arndale OCTA (Samsung?)
My next planned acquisition as far as ARM machines are concerned is Chromebook 2.
Karanbir Singh kbsingh@centos.org wrote:
On 08/08/2014 01:33 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 08/08/2014 01:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi guys,
as a show of hands, can we get a list of :
- boards we have at the moment
I'm going to hazard a guess there isn't any point in even mentioning anything that isn't at least ARMv7?
well, if people want to come along and do the work for other platforms, I dont see why we should block that. But realistically, I've been working on the assumption that 512MB of ram and 400Mhz+ is perhaps the lowest end we should try and target resource wise.
Boards we would like to have in say the next 6 to 8 months
boards that dont make either of those two lists, but what folks
think might be worth targetting anyway
Am I right in assuming the main purpose of this question is for determining which kernel builds are worth trying to provide?
At the moment, I am trying to workout what sort of resources we might want to pool in for the builder, testing side.
-
Gordan Bobic