Hi Jim,
Please help incorporate the attached patches in the next build.
Please note that patches 0008 and 0009 are more applicable to X-Gene 2 which you should be able to verify on Merlin boards.
Thanks,
-Phong
Thanks. I'll pull these in, but I can't current test them. I don't have the merlin board on-hand yet.
On 02/16/2016 12:45 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Please help incorporate the attached patches in the next build.
Please note that patches 0008 and 0009 are more applicable to X-Gene 2 which you should be able to verify on Merlin boards.
Thanks,
-Phong
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
On 02/16/2016 12:45 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Please help incorporate the attached patches in the next build.
Please note that patches 0008 and 0009 are more applicable to X-Gene 2 which you should be able to verify on Merlin boards.
Applied the patches and validated the Merlin board today actually. It seems to work fine here so far, so I'm going to let it run overnight and push the updates live in the morning as a -26 kernel update.
The merlin board installs fine with 7.2.1511, but obviously lacks network without these patches. With this and some other hardware changes, it may be useful to push a new installer and tree, so I may work on putting together a 7.2.1603 image in the near future as well. We'll see what the others say.
Hi Jim,
I need aarch64 builds for the following packages as we rely on them for various testing.
+ iperf2 + iperf3 + iozone + nginx + xdd
Please see if you can incorporate them in 7.2 aarch64 distro.
Thanks,
-Phong
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:39:30PM +0700, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
I need aarch64 builds for the following packages as we rely on them for various testing.
- iperf2
- iperf3
- iozone
- nginx
- xdd
Please see if you can incorporate them in 7.2 aarch64 distro.
RHELSA is released by Red Hat with a certain set of packages that are deemed suitable by Red Hat. CentOS takes these packages and rebuilds them. I checked and Red Hat released:
iperf 2.x - in RHEL 6, but not RHEL 7 iperf 3 - never iozone - never nginx - never xdd - never
If you need packages on top of the ones provided by Red Hat, then you have to use a separate channel called EPEL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
EPEL is a public project which anyone can build packages for. You just have to apply to become a packager and start submitting packages.
Having said that, there is not yet an aarch64 channel in EPEL, but there is work going on to add this.
Rich.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:17:34PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Having said that, there is not yet an aarch64 channel in EPEL, but there is work going on to add this.
Apparently waiting on a hardware delivery.
Rich.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/16 22:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:17:34PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Having said that, there is not yet an aarch64 channel in EPEL, but there is work going on to add this.
Apparently waiting on a hardware delivery.
I am not sure how usable its going to be though - are they still going to use the RHELSA roots for building EPEL ?
- -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:24:35PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/03/16 22:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:17:34PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Having said that, there is not yet an aarch64 channel in EPEL, but there is work going on to add this.
Apparently waiting on a hardware delivery.
I am not sure how usable its going to be though - are they still going to use the RHELSA roots for building EPEL ?
We (Red Hat) use RHELSA for some internal EPEL builds that we have, but assume you'll use CentOS/aarch64 as a base for the public EPEL builds.
Rich.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/16 22:40, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Apparently waiting on a hardware delivery.
I am not sure how usable its going to be though - are they still going to use the RHELSA roots for building EPEL ?
We (Red Hat) use RHELSA for some internal EPEL builds that we have, but assume you'll use CentOS/aarch64 as a base for the public EPEL builds.
thats a key req for the result to be usable! So happy to hear that, it would also open doors for the armv7 epel builds.
- -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Hi Jim,
Seen -26 kernel update, but will you have an update to sig-altarch-kernel GIT soon?
Thanks,
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:41 AM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Additional X-Gene patches
On 02/16/2016 12:45 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Please help incorporate the attached patches in the next build.
Please note that patches 0008 and 0009 are more applicable to X-Gene 2 which you should be able to verify on Merlin boards.
Applied the patches and validated the Merlin board today actually. It seems to work fine here so far, so I'm going to let it run overnight and push the updates live in the morning as a -26 kernel update.
The merlin board installs fine with 7.2.1511, but obviously lacks network without these patches. With this and some other hardware changes, it may be useful to push a new installer and tree, so I may work on putting together a 7.2.1603 image in the near future as well. We'll see what the others say.
Oh, it helps if I push the updates. Done, sorry for the delay on that.
On 03/07/2016 06:18 PM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Seen -26 kernel update, but will you have an update to sig-altarch-kernel GIT soon?
Thanks, Jim
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 6:25 PM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Additional X-Gene patches
Oh, it helps if I push the updates. Done, sorry for the delay on that.
On 03/07/2016 06:18 PM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Seen -26 kernel update, but will you have an update to
sig-altarch-kernel
GIT soon?
-
Jim Perrin -
Karanbir Singh -
Phong Vo -
Richard W.M. Jones