According to Hans, there items in at least 3.19 that match uboot 2015.02
to support more features on armv7 SOCs. The more board/features work,
the better the take-up.
So I vote to follow aarch64.
On 05/11/2015 10:23 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As Jim used kernel 4.0.0-1 for the aarch64 (alpha) build (announced
today), I was wondering what would be the best kernel to use/target
for armv7hl.
Is patching the el7 kernel the way to go, or do we prefer/want to use
the same one everywhere if possible (so also using 4.0.0-1, and
tracking the aarch64 version).
Cheers,
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlVQ5ZgACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6BFgCfbIaaP1kpWUKHTIKuW55cUiaS
4NYAn3cjUVikbTqYvXllMb4l4B9PMSZO
=xI8e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Arm-dev mailing list
Arm-dev@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev