-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As Jim used kernel 4.0.0-1 for the aarch64 (alpha) build (announced today), I was wondering what would be the best kernel to use/target for armv7hl. Is patching the el7 kernel the way to go, or do we prefer/want to use the same one everywhere if possible (so also using 4.0.0-1, and tracking the aarch64 version).
Cheers,
- --
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
According to Hans, there items in at least 3.19 that match uboot 2015.02 to support more features on armv7 SOCs. The more board/features work, the better the take-up.
So I vote to follow aarch64.
On 05/11/2015 10:23 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As Jim used kernel 4.0.0-1 for the aarch64 (alpha) build (announced today), I was wondering what would be the best kernel to use/target for armv7hl. Is patching the el7 kernel the way to go, or do we prefer/want to use the same one everywhere if possible (so also using 4.0.0-1, and tracking the aarch64 version).
Cheers,
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlVQ5ZgACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6BFgCfbIaaP1kpWUKHTIKuW55cUiaS 4NYAn3cjUVikbTqYvXllMb4l4B9PMSZO =xI8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
-
Fabian Arrotin -
Robert Moskowitz