With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
1. new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka. Will ceph need this as well?
2. If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch, dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
Alternately we could create a centos-release-openstack-mitaka-experimental for now if it can work stand-alone.
3. Mirror locations on buildlogs and mirrors need to be created and tested. Possible adjustments to existing -release files due to the /altarch/ vs centos path differences.
4. Package signing. This should already work with existing infra, but need to test and validate.
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
- new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
Will ceph need this as well?
- If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for all tags:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
I looked at requirements of OpenStack Mitaka packages and turns out that none of them require ceph. But I could be wrong.
The only requirement is from centos-release-openstack-mitaka one which depends on centos-release-ceph one.
Alternately we could create a centos-release-openstack-mitaka-experimental for now if it can work stand-alone.
- Mirror locations on buildlogs and mirrors need to be created and
tested.
Possible adjustments to existing -release files due to the /altarch/ vs centos path differences.
centos-release-* files would need changes to cover altarch paths.
- Package signing. This should already work with existing infra, but
need to test and validate.
I looked at requirements of OpenStack Mitaka packages and turns out that none of them require ceph. But I could be wrong.
It is an optional storage backend, so dependency is implicit, via installer/puppet.
Alan
On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
- new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
Will ceph need this as well?
- If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for all tags:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. Could you just sketch out a brief summary?
Thanks, -George
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze:
On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
- new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
Will ceph need this as well?
- If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for all tags:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. Could you just sketch out a brief summary?
You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure.
What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice to have.
So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug).
On 07/07/2016 03:26 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze:
On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
- new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
Will ceph need this as well?
- If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for all tags:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. Could you just sketch out a brief summary?
You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure.
What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice to have.
We can pull this in.
So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug).
I might suggest that for now (until we get the mirror bits sorted), we create a centos-release-mitaka-altarch package. This would avoid needing to mess with the existing x86_64 bits. once everything is aligned, then we can obsolete/provides the replacement and use the standard package across all architectures.
2016-07-07 17:41 GMT+02:00 Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org:
On 07/07/2016 03:26 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze:
On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and the ownership for those steps.
Thomas please correct/update these as needed
Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
- new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
Will ceph need this as well?
- If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev, centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need to be addressed.
It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for all tags:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph) https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient. Could you just sketch out a brief summary?
You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure.
What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice to have.
We can pull this in.
So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug).
I might suggest that for now (until we get the mirror bits sorted), we create a centos-release-mitaka-altarch package. This would avoid needing to mess with the existing x86_64 bits. once everything is aligned, then we can obsolete/provides the replacement and use the standard package across all architectures.
Works for me.
-- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
rdo-list mailing list rdo-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com
-
Alan Pevec -
George Dunlap -
Haïkel -
Jim Perrin -
Marcin Juszkiewicz