Discuss July 2005

discuss@lists.centos.org

190 participants
231 discussions

Start a nNew thread

IDE RAID support
by Joseph T Mai 26 Jul '05

26 Jul '05

Sorry if this has been asked previously. Does CentOS support IDE hardware RAID on HP DL320? Thanks, -j

12 20

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 5, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 26 Jul '05

26 Jul '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 httpd - security update (fixed) (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 httpd - security update (fixed) (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2005:640-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 xxx security update (John Newbigin) 4. CESA-2005:640-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 fetchmail security update (John Newbigin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:05:47 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 httpd - security update (fixed) To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050725140547.GA21516(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:582 (resend with correct CentOS patch/version) httpd security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-582.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-46.2.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.2.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-46.2.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-46.2.ent.centos.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update httpd\* mod_ssl Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

Centos Mail
by Marius Nicolaescu 26 Jul '05

26 Jul '05

I have a problem finding the log from centos. I have installed qmail and i receive a lot of infected mails and i can't stop them because i don't know the ip from where they came. I know that in log files it is kept that ip but i havent't find it. In /var/log/ maillog it is a list but it does not have the ip of the mails. Can anyone help me? Another problem I have with Auto-responder from mail, it's not working at all. Good luck and thank you. -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/

3 2

Intel based Mac and CentOS scores a win!
by Todd Rittinger 26 Jul '05

26 Jul '05

Interesting article on multi-booting the developer Intel based Mac with MacOS, WinXP and you guessed it: CentOS! Way to go, especially since Fedora kernel panicked on them.... http://www.jasbone.com/blog/archives/2005/07/multibooting_in.html cya, TR -- Todd Rittinger TLC Solutions www.tlcsolutions.ca

2 1

Not booting without keyboad.
by Ugo Bellavance 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Hi, I'm running CentOS 3 on a Dell celeron 500/256 MB. It won't boot without a keyboard and that is a problem for me. I know it is not a perfect setup, but I'd like to have it boot w/o a keyboard. The Bios doesn't seem to care too much about the fact that no keyboard is plugged in, as it loads Grub and starts booting the kernel. It hangs, usually around Total HugeTLB memory allocated, 0 Any ideas? Thanks, -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies.

7 15

Trying to compile, incompatible libraries? Cento4
by Edward Croft 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

I get the errors: zip4_lnx.a(generic.o)(.text+0xb16): more undefined references to `__ctype_b' follow zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_close(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_addr(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_loaded(a)GLIBC_2.1' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_open(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0' I have the compatibility libraries installed. I have tried using gcc296, gcc, and gcc4 and still get the message. The library,libdl.so.2 is in /lib with a symlink to /usr/lib/libdl.so Using CentOS 4.0. -- If the sane say the insane are insane, What if the sane are insane? Would that make the insane sane? Explains a lot in Washington! --E. Croft

3 6

CESA-2005:587 missing devhelp src.rpm
by Matthew Miller 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

> src: > devhelp-0.9.2-2.4.6.src.rpm > mozilla-1.7.10-1.4.1.centos4.src.rpm The mozilla src.rpm is there, but the devhelp one seems to be missing from the mirrors.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 76 degrees Fahrenheit.

1 1

Install Problems Centos 4.1
by Peter Farrow 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Dear All, I have a K8S-MX Asus Athlon 64 Motherboard with a 754 pin 3000+ CPU, which I cam trying to install 4.1 Centos 64 bit. The problem seems to arise when installing onto Mirrored disks, I have noticed that from Centos 4 onwards it tries to rebuild the arrays as it installs which slows the whole process right down across all platforms I have tried it on. In addition, the install process bails out at random times with random errors eg. "Disk Full", "error loading this package or that package", Error reading DVD etc... now I have burnt several copies of the DVD, tested them fully, tried installing from CD, even changed the hardware to a twin Opteron system, changed the RAM changed this disks and tried everything but it still seems really touch and go as to wether the install will complete. I haven't managed it yet on the Asus platform it took about 12 goes on the opteron platform. Yet Centos 3.4 installs no problem. Finally the last straw was the boot loader problem with occurs either immediately after reboot after install or on one of the boots soon after, and I have to do this to fix it: -------------------------------------- grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setup (hd0) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. grub> root (hd1,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setup (hd1) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd1)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1) (hd1)1+16 p (hd1,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. grub> quit ------------------ Has anyone else seen these tedious unpredicatble errors on install that seems to have arrived with version 4 onwards...? Regards Pete

7 13

yum gives HTTP Error 404: Not Found
by Ulrik S. Kofod 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Is it just me that get this error or is the httpd-devel file not publiched yet? # yum -y update Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-3 - Addons Server: CentOS-3 - Base Server: CentOS-3 - Extras Server: CentOS-3 - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [update: httpd-devel 2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] [update: httpd 2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] [update: mod_ssl 1:2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] Downloading Packages Getting httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386.rpm retrygrab() failed for: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386//RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.… Executing failover method failover: out of servers to try Error getting file http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386//RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.… [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.

3 2

RAID 5 vs. RAID 10
by Andrew Vong 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Hi, I am looking into purchasing a new server. This server will be mission-critical. I have read and somewhat understood the theories behind RAIDs 0, 1, 5, 10 & JBOD. However, I would like to get some feedback from those who have experience in implementing and recovering from a HDD failure using RAID. Hardware specs include:- Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz 2 GB RAM I would like to implement hardware RAID but am unsure as to which would be most suitable for my needs. Any advice is appreciated. Option 1 - RAID 5 (3 hdd's) + 1 hot spare Option 2 - RAID 10 (4 hdd's) + 1 "cold" spare (in the shelf) Questions I have :- 1) When should RAID 5 be implemented? 2) When should RAID 10 be implemented? 3) Is RAID 5 with a hot spare safer than RAID 10 with a "cold" spare? 4) Is it possible to configure RAID 10 to have a hot spare? 5) Should one of the HDDs fail, a hot spare w kick-in immediately and begin rebuilding. As I am planning to put in 300 GB HDDs, how long would this take on a RAID 5 vs. RAID 10? 6) Will there be a degradation in performance for users on the system (RAID 5 vs. RAID 10)? 7) What are the disadvantages of using RAID 5 vs. RAID 10? Thanks in advance for answering my questions. Best Regards, Andrew

3 4

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss July 2005