Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

modern motherboard for centos-5
by fred smith 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

I'm considering upgrading, and am trying to choose a modern motherboard that nevertheless fully works with Centos5/RHEL5. Though I'm partial to AMD processors, and would like to use one in my new configuration, that's not a requirement, if the most appropriate board happens to be intel-compatible. However, given the way ASUS is dumping LInux and crawling more firmly into bed with the Beast, I'd prefer to avoid ASUS boards. I see that NewEgg has some combo deals at reasonable prices, but I can't tell which chipsets/boards are known to work with centos5 and which aren't. Just at random, here's one of their offerings, a Biostar board: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138143 I've always understood Biostar boards to be cheap, not only in price, but perhaps they're serviceable? I'm open to other suggestions, too. Thanks in advance! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) -----------------------------

7 11

Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) and/orputty-tools
by Rainer Traut 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Sorin Srbu schrieb: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal >> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:02 AM >> To: 'CentOS mailing list' >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) > and/orputty-tools >> What about FileZilla? > > Doesn't support ssh/sftp/scp IIRC. It does support FTPS (ftp over SSL) and SFTP. Rainer

2 1

Custom udev rules to override defaults?
by James Pearson 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

I'm trying to work out how to set up a custom udev rule to override permissions on serial ports (/dev/ttyS* and /dev/ttyUSB*) on CentOS 5.3 The default rule, in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules has the line: KERNEL=="tty[A-Z]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="uucp", MODE="0660" and I would like the mode to be 0666 Various docs on web say that you shouldn't change 50-udev.rules, but instead create a new rule file that appears lexically before that rule - so I've created a file that contains the line: KERNEL=="tty[A-Z]*", NAME="%k", GROUP="uucp", MODE="0666" called 10-local.rules However, this doesn't work ... the /dev/ttyS* device files get the 'default' owner/group/perms (mode = '0600', uid = '0', gid = '0') If I rename the 10-local.rules to say 99-local.rules, then the device files get the owner/group/perms from 50-udev.rules (mode = '0660', uid = '0', gid = '14') I can get the mode set to 0666 by editing 50-udev.rules, however this seems wrong as you should be able to override the defaults without doing this. Anyone know if this is possible? Thanks James Pearson

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1148 Important CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2009:1148 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 httpd Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CEBA-2009:1150 CentOS 5 i386 samba Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CEBA-2009:1150 CentOS 5 x86_64 samba Update (Karanbir Singh) 5. CEBA-2009:1151 CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) 6. CEBA-2009:1151 CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:16:38 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1148 Important CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714121638.GA20972(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1148 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1148.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 20c7291a0b1ba5b1823d05d45b67095f httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.i386.rpm 4c9b12469c6f246d04069920f8dc748d httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.i386.rpm 6e115b36e56a7f2242c4c25422c45490 httpd-manual-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.i386.rpm 52201955ea348d8f6312c883a24293b0 mod_ssl-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.i386.rpm Source: 9c7c76ecfefceebe7efa6bc29060eccb httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:16:38 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1148 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 httpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714121638.GA20987(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1148 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1148.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 83cce6942f7e2f7ef2b32f07f590622c httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.x86_64.rpm aafb6f56e8b91972700b4de9f8dc62a9 httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.i386.rpm 8b868f4bb88876785297769e96a31338 httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.x86_64.rpm 57129d5ee5a3d2ba431b07a1ede815ec httpd-manual-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.x86_64.rpm fce5b8446ecfcea2dab659fd7e5e8b42 mod_ssl-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 9c7c76ecfefceebe7efa6bc29060eccb httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:17:11 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1150 CentOS 5 i386 samba Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714121711.GA21022(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1150 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1150.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1614680ff04af70c9cf33bd401107be6 samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.i386.rpm 3813cb8e15a7efc33b91d289219708e0 samba-client-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.i386.rpm 35776aecd1fce198db6ad76833e1f642 samba-common-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.i386.rpm d033398238ecbd7905835f71c3147198 samba-swat-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.i386.rpm Source: 93296c429ee5ca69c52d44577c1da159 samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:17:12 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1150 CentOS 5 x86_64 samba Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714121712.GA21037(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1150 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1150.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a598862a58268de5acf5d7be2733fa0f samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm 619d581bff37e939f7edc1a04711b430 samba-client-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm 989066af071eec07636b55148286ef7d samba-common-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.i386.rpm cad6792951ed0519b2c9dbbed6f345c6 samba-common-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm fc6a8d42d064019d69901b72878f352e samba-swat-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 93296c429ee5ca69c52d44577c1da159 samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5_3.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:22:29 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1151 CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714152229.GA21783(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1151 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2df309febf7c8efd248599d9681fcabc kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm ab3f5b65c8d52ee59bab97b5d2313959 kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 81911f54b4e33e5c740ce9aad921afd6 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm f06232d28ad3d0f5a227dfd039963c5c kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 35d5822a6398d26529ac6e49ac6c55cb kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.noarch.rpm e8c32733957c864a13ab45b55aa9ffe4 kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i386.rpm df54c10f70032d0e577013a1b9b3635f kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 560d8369ee87d947f39735dfb3e7076e kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 1215fdee3c7174473621004d9e24b522 kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm 25e768b348684a8a4a3b52677dfa15a3 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm Source: 9be27404b031de0cb9d52c1bcb6ccff1 kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:22:30 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1151 CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090714152230.GA21798(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1151 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1151.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0a85592e432b37ce0b63d68a75423c95 kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm c6d9ed2a667c515cc3eb794107996e94 kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 35b2c8d2be1ec2a23cec4192ea2a59c1 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 014f9d384b2c94db0d839f598c7d36c1 kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm fa88009332b147d27c53286f0223b761 kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.noarch.rpm 9c37e3e57ef693654215116b7b33ef8b kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 9f012a34655b11bf9b832b55685655a9 kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 6099e4c675c10dee5622e5a01941acc4 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 9be27404b031de0cb9d52c1bcb6ccff1 kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4 **********************************************

1 0

reload /etc/security/limits.conf without reboot server??
by mcclnx mcc 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

We have CENTOS 4.7 on DELL server. We need change following 3 files: /etc/security/limits.conf /etc/pam.d/sshd /etc/pam.d/su Does there has way reload it without reboot server? Thanks. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 付費才容量無上限？Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你，信件永遠不必刪！ http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing

2 2

no more single cd installs?
by William Warren 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new default? Sincerely, William Warren

13 16

How to change Disk sequence on DELL R900 CENTOS 5.3?
by mcclnx mcc 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

we have DELL R900 with CENTOS 5.3 in it. This DELL R900 come with one integrate PERC6/I and two PERC6/E card. DELL 6/I control 5 internal disks. The original disk sequence are: /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 / /dev/sdb1 swap ... after I configured PERC6/E disks and reboot, /dev/sda change to RAID disk and original /boot and / change to /dev/sde1 and /dev/sde2. My modprobe.conf is: alias scsi_hostadapter megaraid_sas alias scsi_hostadapter1 ata_piix alias eth0 bnx2 alias eth0.1998 bnx2 alias eth1 bnx2 how to change sequence back? Thanks. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 付費才容量無上限？Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你，信件永遠不必刪！ http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing

4 3

Iptables issues again
by Bo Lynch 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

I know that I have asked this before of the list. However we just changed ISP and ip's and I'm having this issue again. I have a linux firewall using iptables with the following config eth0 = WAN 1 eth1 = LAN 1 eth2 = WAN 2 I'm trying to forward all traffic that makes a request from eth2 to an internal IP on eth1. These are the folloing rules that I have set up. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:80 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 5071 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:5071 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 407 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:407 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1417 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1417 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1418 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1418 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1419 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1419 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1420 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1420 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 7880 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:7880 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:443 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 407 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:407 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1417 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1417 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1418 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1418 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1419 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1419 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 1420 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:1420 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth2 -d 69.21.103.132 --dport 7880 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3:7880 iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 5071 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 407 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1417 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1418 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1419 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1420 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 7880 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 407 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1417 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1418 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1419 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1420 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 7880 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 5071 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 407 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1417 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1418 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1419 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1420 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 7880 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 407 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1417 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1418 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1419 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 1420 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -i eth2 -d 192.168.1.3 --dport 7880 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth2 -s 192.168.1.3 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.3 -j SNAT -o eth2 --to-source 69.21.103.132 iptables -A FORWARD -t filter -o eth2 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -o eth2 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -t filter -i eth2 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth2 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -o eth1 -d 192.168.1.3 -m multiport --dports 80,443 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT I'm sure its something I'm doing wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Bo Lynch

1 0

Question about optimal filesystem with many small files.
by oooooooooooo ooooooooooooo 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Hi, I have a program that writes lots of files to a directory tree (around 15 Million fo files), and a node can have up to 400000 files (and I don't have any way to split this ammount in smaller ones). As the number of files grows, my application gets slower and slower (the app is works something like a cache for another app and I can't redesign the way it distributes files into disk due to the other app requirements). The filesystem I use is ext3 with teh following options enabled: Filesystem features: has_journal resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery sparse_super large_file Is there any way to improve performance in ext3? Would you suggest another FS for this situation (this is a prodution server, so I need a stable one) ? Thanks in advance (and please excuse my bad english). _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=…

11 38

raid 1 disks upgrade
by Coert Waagmeester 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Hello all, I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB SATAs This is the partition structure on both disks: Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 26 1971 15631245 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda3 1972 30401 228363975 fd Linux raid autodetect there are 3x RAID1 arrays. First is for /boot Second if for swap Third is for LVM (contains / and other filesystems) What is the easiest way to get this upgraded? I thought that I could maybe dd all the LVM volumes and /boot into files, setup the new RAID1 arrays on the 1TB disks, and dd everything back? or is there an easier way? Regards, Coert

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss