Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

[OT] Batch Job Scheduler/Manager
by Mauriat Miranda 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Hi. Looking for suggestions/ideas. I have pretty loose requirements at this point, but I am looking for a tool (or set of tools) where I can automate and control a large group of tasks by a basic web front end. I have a series of scripts that do various conversions of data or media, as well as analysis and I want to be able check their status, see if they completed or if they failed. Then possibly react or setup alternate jobs if they passed or failed, etc. - some basic logic. I want to avoid building something for this. But if there already exists a tool(s) that I could tailor that would be good too. Something Perl would be perfect, but PHP could be made to work. Free or not would be acceptable. Thanks for any ideas. -Mauriat

5 8

Re: [CentOS] Fortran90 and 77 on CentOS
by Marcelo M. Garcia 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > Is anybody here using Fortran90 and Fortran77 on their CentOS-machine(s)? > > If so, did you get that from a repo or something? One of our PhD-students > needs a software that requires the Fortran compilers mentioned in order to > make the sources for our i7-machines. > > The Fortran stuff that is available to me is from the standard CentOS repos, > as well as Rpmforge and EPEL repos, from which I got gcc43-fortran and some > more dependencies and and such. But as far as I can tell, this is not going > to work. > > This is all new territory to me, to have to compile stuff... Please let me > know if this is off-topic and should be taken elsewhere. > > Thanks for any information. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Intel has "non-commercial software download" with FORTRAN, C/C++, MKL, etc: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/non-commercial-software-download/ Regards mg.

2 1

Fortran90 and 77 on CentOS
by Sorin Srbu 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Hi all, Is anybody here using Fortran90 and Fortran77 on their CentOS-machine(s)? If so, did you get that from a repo or something? One of our PhD-students needs a software that requires the Fortran compilers mentioned in order to make the sources for our i7-machines. The Fortran stuff that is available to me is from the standard CentOS repos, as well as Rpmforge and EPEL repos, from which I got gcc43-fortran and some more dependencies and and such. But as far as I can tell, this is not going to work. This is all new territory to me, to have to compile stuff... Please let me know if this is off-topic and should be taken elsewhere. Thanks for any information. -- BW, Sorin ----------------------------------------------------------- # Sorin Srbu [Sysadmin, Systems Engineer] # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM # Div of Org Pharm Chem, Mobile: +46 (0)701-718023 # Box 574, Uppsala University, Fax: +46 (0)18-4714482 # SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b # Web: http://www.orgfarm.uu.se ----------------------------------------------------------- # () ASCII ribbon campaign - Against html E-mail # /\ # # MotD follows: # CentOS: Enterprise Linux for the people.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
by Radu-Cristian FOTESCU 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

> Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS > Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good > job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag > than the current 10 week release lag), and I would much rather > see this than effort diluted by taking on a contrib repo. Right: http://beranger.org/v3/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/useless_chart_r… After all, I love (some) charts from time to time. R-C __________________________________________________________________ The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
by Radu-Cristian FOTESCU 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

> I Can not speak for others, but the only time i have > seen Karanbir be stern with anyone is when they do > deserve it. Well, I've read him saying in various ways and on several occasions something that would equate "RTFM", only it was put in such an offensive way that even myself, as an external reader, I felt compassion for the poor user who was asking an innocent question just to be slapped over the face. > I have no idea what your deal is though with going > after anyone and everybody. Do you just love attacking > people in gerernal? Of course. I also like killing kittens and sodomizing kids. If telling to someone that there are issues with "his" repo (that was RPMforge and Dag is #1 when comes to RF) is an attack, then your world and my world are different, and *your* world is broken. Basically, I have been answered that I cannot ask for consistency for something that's free unless I help fixing the issues. Fair enough. But then, if mentioning that KB's repo for EL5 is still having *everything* in testing (the repo for EL4 is not in testing, and it even wasn't in testing a few years ago when I was using it) is still an attack... ...whereas KB's *offending* and *despising* answer (because *this* is how he usually replies!) basically says that I am an idiot who shouldn't use his repo (only that he wasn't using these exact words, so he's technically "politically correct" in the way he's telling people that they're morons that should shut the fsck up) is not an attack, huh? Well, then raise a statue to the beloved KB, because I'm gonna shut the fuck up. This is not a community, and I know of several people who use ScientificLinux not because it's better, but because on their mailing list, their developers *don't* imply that people are morons when they spit an answer to the list. But now, you're right: should I have the chance to meet KB in person, I'd punch him in the face with an infinite pleasure. R-C __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
by Sorin Srbu 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:26 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options > >>FYI, gallery2 is available in EPEL for EL-5. > >I used the info available at >http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rhel-fedora-centos-linux-enable-epel-repo/ to >add the EPEL-repo. Replying to myself... Googled some and found that Gallery2 is most probably in the Fedora development repo. Now to find how I add this repo to CentOS.. -- /Sorin

1 0

Playing with php 5.3.0
by Michael A. Peters 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Even though I do not recommend it for production yet, I packaged and am playing with php 5.3.0 - src.rpm at http://www.clfsrpm.net/php53/ (needed epel to build) Other than the suhosin loadable module messing up pear's ability to do anything, initial tests show it working fairly well. Looks like the enchant module is a nogo on CentOS (aspell too old) but in the few hours of testing, none of my code (yet) is broken in it. There are some warnings in the log files w/ respect to squirrelmail and setting time zone (stock centos squirrelmail), I'll have to look into that, and the php src.rpm there actually has a minor bug - it should obsolete/provide pecl-Fileinfo, but I'll wait for suhosin to come up with their patch to core php before I bother to update. Anyway, it's there for anyone who feels like playing with 5.3.0 to see what breaks, you just to rebuild the src.rpm.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
by Matt 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu(a)orgfarm.uu.se>wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a web photo gallery for my personal web server at home. > Till > now I've done the galleries manually from Adobe Photoshop Elements, but I > feel that is a dead end, kinda', besides the fact that the galleries > created > are rather static. I'd like an easier way to do this, eg uploading images > in > folders directly to the gallery and it will take care of what needs to be > done automagically, like resizing etc. > > So far I've come across a project called Gallery2, that seems to do what I > want. Downside is that no rpm-packages are available with yum with this > one. > > What web photo gallery software do you guys use? > > My requirements are only that the software should be simple to install, > maintain and add more photos. I'm not a pro (a newbie more like it...) when > it comes to mysql and php, so this needs to be easy to do as well, from the > gallery standpoint. > > Thanks. > -- Try this one: Single File PHP Gallery http://sye.dk/sfpg/ Very simple. Matt

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
by Radu-Cristian FOTESCU 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

> A quick look at http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos > shows that a great majority of the packages are not even > close to being "up-to-date", and that is a good thing for > those us of who care more about stability than eyecandy. That can't be other way. For instance, you can't build GIMP 2.4 or 2.6 unless you you upgrade to a newer GTK+, which would impact on a lot of apps. OTOH, Dag is in a funny position: he's the main maintainer of RPMforge, which has 2 main issues: (1) It's broken, at least partially. Try install audacious for one. (2) It's incompatible with EPEL. Try install MPlayer and VLC with EPEL enabled. To workaround some of the issues and make CentOS 5.3 a suitable distro for my Acer laptop (except that I don't use wireless and I haven't even tried to), I've made my own repo here: http://odiecolon.lastdot.org/ Read the first-page text and rationale *very* carefully! It's therefore an ugly hack to allow: *** the use of the following packages from RPMforge: (1) gstreamer-plugins-bad gstreamer-plugins-ugly gstreamer-ffmpeg (2) mplayer mplayer-fonts mplayer-skins mplayerplug-in smplayer (3) vlc *** the regular use of EPEL for everything else; *** the use of newer packages, such as GIMP 2.3.15 as an "almost-2.4" alternative to the obsolete 2.2.12; *** the use of other (unavailable in EPEL or newer) packages, including "cosmetic mood enhancers": (i) gnome-dustwave-theme 0.1, a mix of two themes introduced with Ubuntu Jaunty: it uses Dust for Metacity, and New Wave for the GTK+ decorations. Compiz effects *must* be disabled. (ii) gtk-nimbus-theme 0.1.2, the latest default theme that comes with OpenSolaris 2009.06. As I am not even on my home continent these days and I can't fix any reported issue right now (oh well, but does Dag ever fix RPMforge?), I have not announced this repo in any public place, but it was nevertheless announced on epel-devel-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2009-June/msg00103.html Be free to test and report. Thanks, R-C aka Béranger __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/

18 28

Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
by John R Pierce 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Checked the site ou linked too, but I don't get it. Would my pics be hosted > on my own server or on jalbum.net á la Picasa? I can't tell from the tour on > the jalbum web site. > you run jalbum on the workstation that you use to process your photos (could even be a mac or windows desktop, it really doesn't matter), and it creates all the scaled images and thumbnails and html pages, and uploads them to your webserver. the overhead mentioned by others only happens *once* when you initially process or add to the album. your webserver only has to handle plain html, no php or other scripting languags, no databases.

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss