Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

magic.mime dependency problem between file and httpd
by Marko Vojinovic 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hi everyone! :-) While doing a regular manual yum update on my ContOS 5.3 server, yum complained as follows: [root@sith ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * epel: ftp.icm.edu.pl * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * base: centosb2.centos.org * updates: centose.centos.org * extras: centosb2.centos.org * addons: mirror.nsc.liu.se 2152 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package file.i386 0:4.17-15.el5_3.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: httpd --> Finished Dependency Resolution httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed) So what is wrong and why? Best, :-) Marko

3 3

[OT] Oracle->MySQL ODBC via SSL using: stock MySQL, mysql-connect or-odbc-3.51.27-0, Oracle XE
by Jason Pyeron 21 May '09

21 May '09

I know this is very off topic, but getting MySQL and unix ODBC to play nice via SSL on Centos has been a battle. I finally have it working via isql but when I connect via Oracle I get an error. If I use the mysql odbc connector directly: ORA-28500: connection from ORACLE to a non-Oracle system returned this message: [Generic Connectivity Using ODBC][MySQL][ODBC 3.51 Driver]SSL connection error (SQL State: S1000; SQL Code: 2026) ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from USGNWEB If I connect via unixODBC: ORA-28500: connection from ORACLE to a non-Oracle system returned this message: [Generic Connectivity Using ODBC][unixODBC][MySQL][ODBC 3.51 Driver]SSL connection error (SQL State: S1000; SQL Code: 2026) ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from USGNWEB My assumption is that I am missing some environment variable in Oracle's environment, but what should I look for? What information could I provide that would be helpful? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

1 1

MySql Query Cache
by James Matthews 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hi, One of the servers I run is a VPS running Lighttpd fcgi which I am running a simple wordpress blog off of. Since RAM is the biggest limitation I have disabled the query cache on MySql. Now I have the following questions. 1. What does the FCGI server cache now? 2. How can I speed up this setup? 3. Will turning on the query cache speed things up? I am trying to make sure the system doesn't swap much so things stay snappy. Thanks James -- http://www.jewelerslounge.com

1 0

xen kernel can't boot
by cjzjm100 21 May '09

21 May '09

I had installed the kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 .However ,when i chosed that,the system could't boot.It just always reboot!When i chosed the kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5,there was nothing wrong! What's the problem?

2 1

Couldn't recognize the image file format for file /usr/share/gdm/themes/Default/background.png error
by Dale - Ehome 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hello All, I am getting the following error on re-booting my CentOS 4.5 server: "There was an error loading the theme *Default*" "Couldn't recognize the image file format for file '/*usr*/*share*/*gdm*/*themes*/*Default*/*background*.*png*'" It appears that when I click on the OK dialog the server continues to boot, with no update to the screen. I have in the past verified that this file exists and does not appear to have any problems. I can now get remote access to the server and wish to do whatever it takes to prevent this from happening in the future. This summer I hope to upgrade the box to the latest CentOS. I do know the box will need to be restarted once before that time due to some planned changes at the co-loc. Any ideas on what to change/fix to prevent this from happening again? Thank you very much! Dale

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 21 May '09

21 May '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1040 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 ntp - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2009:0955 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 nfs-utils - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2009:0981 Low CentOS 4 ia64 util-linux - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:43:18 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)centos.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1040 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 ntp - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090521144318.GG18516(a)centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1040 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ntp-4.2.0.a.20040617-8.c4.2.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

1 0

help with rebuilding md0 (Raid5)
by Daniel Bird 21 May '09

21 May '09

Sorry, this is going to be a rather long post...Here's the situation; I have 4 IDE disks from an old snap server which fails to mount the raid array. We believe there is a controller error on the SNAP so we've put them in another box running CentOS 5 and can see the disks OK. hda thru hdd looks like this Disk /dev/hdd: 185.2 GB, 185283624960 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 22526 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdd1 * 1 2 16041+ 83 Linux /dev/hdd2 3 70 546210 83 Linux /dev/hdd3 71 138 546210 5 Extended /dev/hdd4 139 21781 173844468 83 Linux /dev/hdd5 71 104 273104+ 83 Linux /dev/hdd6 105 138 273104+ 83 Linux I can mount hdX1 and hdX2 (hdx2 is xfs) on all disks. Now /etc/raidtab (from one of the hdx2 partions) has the following entry which I'd like to re-create on the CentOS box raiddev /dev/md0 raid-level 5 nr-raid-disks 4 nr-spare-disks 0 persistent-superblock 1 chunk-size 64 device /dev/hda4 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdc4 raid-disk 1 device /dev/hde4 raid-disk 2 device /dev/hdg4 raid-disk 3 I've also checked the superblocks /dev/hda4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : a72e334f:a9ccba81:bba665d8:82a3c378 Creation Time : Mon Jun 30 12:00:28 2003 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 173844352 (165.79 GiB 178.02 GB) Array Size : 521533056 (497.37 GiB 534.05 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Tue May 19 21:40:43 2009 State : active Active Devices : 2 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : cbe14089 - correct Events : 0.22 Layout : left-asymmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 3 4 0 active sync /dev/hda4 0 0 3 4 0 active sync /dev/hda4 1 1 22 4 1 faulty /dev/hdc4 2 2 0 0 2 faulty removed 3 3 34 4 3 active sync /dev/hdb4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : a72e334f:a9ccba81:bba665d8:82a3c378 Creation Time : Mon Jun 30 12:00:28 2003 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 173844352 (165.79 GiB 178.02 GB) Array Size : 521533056 (497.37 GiB 534.05 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Sat Aug 2 19:26:28 2008 State : active Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : ca62ce2c - correct Events : 0.21 Layout : left-asymmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 1 22 4 1 active sync /dev/hdc4 0 0 3 4 0 active sync /dev/hda4 1 1 22 4 1 active sync /dev/hdc4 2 2 0 0 2 faulty removed 3 3 34 4 3 active sync /dev/hdc4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : a72e334f:a9ccba81:bba665d8:82a3c378 Creation Time : Mon Jun 30 12:00:28 2003 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 173844352 (165.79 GiB 178.02 GB) Array Size : 521533056 (497.37 GiB 534.05 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 4 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Sun Jul 22 22:33:00 2007 State : active Active Devices : 4 Working Devices : 4 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : c871f493 - correct Events : 0.18 Layout : left-asymmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 2 33 4 2 active sync 0 0 3 4 0 active sync /dev/hda4 1 1 22 4 1 active sync /dev/hdc4 2 2 33 4 2 active sync 3 3 34 4 3 active sync /dev/hdd4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : a72e334f:a9ccba81:bba665d8:82a3c378 Creation Time : Mon Jun 30 12:00:28 2003 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 173844352 (165.79 GiB 178.02 GB) Array Size : 521533056 (497.37 GiB 534.05 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Sat Aug 2 19:26:28 2008 State : active Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : ca62ce3c - correct Events : 0.21 Layout : left-asymmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 3 34 4 3 active sync 0 0 3 4 0 active sync /dev/hda4 1 1 22 4 1 active sync /dev/hdc4 2 2 0 0 2 faulty removed 3 3 34 4 3 active sync This is my fist stab and re-assembling an array after moving the disks so I though I'd double check how I would go about re-assembling this Can I simply do mdadm --assemble --scan ? Or do I need to reset the superblocks and re-assemble in degraded mode somehow? TIA Dan

2 5

Squid proxy as a Gateway Server
by Ashish Gangani 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hi all, Good Day for all, I need Help to Setup Squid proxy as a Gateway Server. The Idea is to use the (Server and Gateway) configured with Squid to run using AUTH_Pam or AUTH_ncsa , but additionally we need to filter some access via group, following the standard filter group used Filter Group 1 - blocked users (no access) Filter Group 2 - standard users (standard access rights) Filter Group 3 - guest users (limited access rights) Filter Group 4 - power users (more generous access & file download rights) Filter Group 5 - admin users (unlimited access) So in this cases all users are authenticated by the Server Only when their try to access internet, they received access denied if user is has no access based on group membership. Thanks and Regards, Ashish Gangani,

1 0

Missing Thunderbird Updates
by Filipe Brandenburger 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hello, I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5. First, I noticed that Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 is available in the "updates" repo of CentOS 5.2, but not on the "updates" repo of CentOS 5.3. The version in the "os" repo of CentOS 5.3 is 2.0.0.18. - Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 in CentOS 5.2 updates repo: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/updates/i386/RPMS/thunderbird-2.0.0.19-… - Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 in CentOS 5.3 os repo: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.3/os/i386/CentOS/thunderbird-2.0.0.18-1.e… - No Thunderbird in CentOS 5.3 updates repo: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/ Then I went upstream to confirm which versions were available there. To my surprise, I found out that there is a src rpm for Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 that dates from March 22. - Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 SRPM in RHEL 5Client: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/thunde… CentOS Developers, could you please build the RPMs for the latest version 2.0.0.21, and investigate why the issue with 2.0.0.19 not being present in the "updates" repo 5.3 happened, and why the new package 2.0.0.21 was not rebuilt even though it dates from more than one month ago? Thanks! Filipe

12 24

Double packages
by Eduardo Silvestre 20 May '09

20 May '09

Hello, i'm trying install some packages with x64_86 architecture and got same packages doubling (32 and 64 bits). How can i force yum just install packages x64_86 based? [root@www pfqueue-0.5.6]# yum install ncurses-devel Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.nfsi.pt * updates: mirrors.nfsi.pt * addons: mirrors.nfsi.pt * extras: mirrors.nfsi.pt Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.5-24.20060715 set to be updated ---> Package ncurses-devel.i386 0:5.5-24.20060715 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.5-24.20060715 base 1.7 M ncurses-devel i386 5.5-24.20060715 base 1.6 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 3.3 M Regards, --- Eduardo Silvestre nfsi telecom, lda. eduardo.silvestre(a)nfsi.pt Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301 http://www.nfsi.pt/

4 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss