Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 51, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 25 May '09

25 May '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:0258 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2009:0258 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2009:0329 Important CentOS 3 ia64 freetype - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 ia64 pidgin - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2009:0329 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) freetype - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) pidgin - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:09:51 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0258 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090525070951.GA29910(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0258 thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0258.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-19.el4.centos.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-19.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update thunderbird Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

OBM groupware on centos
by DNK 25 May '09

25 May '09

Have any of you tried out the OBM groupware stuff on centos? They have RHEL5 rpm's. http://obm.org/doku.php?id=start Also curious how it is as a groupware/exchange alternative.... d

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Gnome terminal oddity
by James B. Byrne 25 May '09

25 May '09

On: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:58:26 +0000 (UTC), Beartooth <Beartooth(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:49:43 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> I have the following gnome terminal profile settings: >> >> Backspace = ASCII DEL >> Delete Key = Escape Sequence > [....] >> I am fairly confident that the delete key worked in the same >> fashion for my usual user id up until quite recently. Does >> anyone know of why or how this behaviour could differ between >> two separate users in the same terminal window? > > I have my gnome-terminal (under Fedora, not CentOS) set to > Control-H and Escape Sequence; that works fine for all users here, > and does what I'm guessing you want. > That setting does not change the observed behaviour. If I su -l then the Escape Sequence DEL removes the character under the cursor and left shifts the line. If I am not the superuser, even in exactly the same gnome terminal window instance, then the DEL has no evident effect. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
by Robert Heller 25 May '09

25 May '09

At Mon, 25 May 2009 15:02:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> wrote: > > Content-language: sv > > > ---Executing: recode > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > > > >> >Probably not the best distro for Laptops, > >> >but many people on this list are using CentOS on their laptops. > >> > >> So what's considered to be the "best" choice for laptops? I understand > >> mileage may vary and so on, but I think there might maybe be a general > >> consensus at least? > > ^^^^^^^^^ > > > >Not likely on this list. More likely, a "preponderance", maybe even a > >"majority", but I wouldn't be surprised if even those aren't achieved. > >BTW, "general" is redundant with "consensus". > > I'm sorry. I'm not a native English speaker or writer. > > Ok, so what would you guys suggest using on a laptop, if CentOS was not an > option? I read in an earlier post where somebody suggested chosing distro > based on the hardware. Suppose this hardware is a Dell Latitude a few years > old, with no built-in wifi, but rather either a Dlink DFE-680TXD or a 3com > 3CRWE154G72. CentOS will work just fine. (Probably *any* distro will work just fine.) CentOS will work with older hardware. The only hardware that will be problematical will be winmodems -- *ALL* linux distros do badly with winmodems. It is a combination of lack of documentation about what is going on inside the winmodem and a serious lack of motivation: most Linux developers have real internet connections and no longer have an interest in dialup, plus *real* (RS232-based) modems are cheap and ALL of them work out-of-the-box. From many points of view, winmodems are pointless hardware. CentOS only has these problems WRT laptops (or desktops to a lesser extent): It is an 'conservitive' distro (same can be said about all of the RHEL-based distros). This means three *main* things: 1) Support for bleeding edge hardware might be a problem. Mostly things like sound cards, WiFi NICs, and (cheap) digital cameras. Most other hardware is 'standardized' enough to work on some level (eg video cards will work at basic resolution levels, etc.) RedHat does back port critical hardware drivers (things like mass storage controller drivers (SATA, SCSI, RAID, etc.)). 2) You won't get the most recent, hot, bleeding edge version of software. You also won't get buggy software either. No great loss IMHO. 3) RHEL distros will lack most of the flashy toys (eg fancy multi-media), including flashy eye-candy. Only 1 is really a 'problem' for laptops, since fresh off the showroom floor laptops tend to have all sorts of bleeding edge hardware. With a desktop one can mix-and-match compatible PCI cards, etc. and avoid or cure these problems. One *could* just snarf a suitable kernel from FC-land if one knows what one is doing, etc. 2 & 3 can be solved with a combination of CentOSPlus, epel, rpmforge, and lots of fun with rpmbuild and srpms from FC-land (or even more fun with tar & make and related tools). I've even dropped in RPMs from Mandrake and SUSE onto my system (rpmfind.net can be quite useful at times). I've even snarfed srpms from other distros and bashed them though rpmbuild, usually after tinkering with the .spec file. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller(a)deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
by William L. Maltby 25 May '09

25 May '09

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > ><snip> > > > >Not likely on this list. More likely, a "preponderance", maybe even a > >"majority", but I wouldn't be surprised if even those aren't achieved. > >BTW, "general" is redundant with "consensus". > > I'm sorry. I'm not a native English speaker or writer. NP. I was not trying to rebuke you. Many "native English speakers" make much more serious errors consistently. You do just fine. I make my share of mistakes - especially since I started using the web so long ago. > > Ok, so what would you guys suggest using on a laptop, if CentOS was not an > option? I read in an earlier post where somebody suggested chosing distro > based on the hardware. Suppose this hardware is a Dell Latitude a few years > old, with no built-in wifi, but rather either a Dlink DFE-680TXD or a 3com > 3CRWE154G72. I don't have one, but with the holiday in the US, you might not get many replies today. The last time this topic was raised, opinions were all over the place. If you google for "laptop" and Centos together with site:centos (maybe a few more words to narrow the search, like "distro", "preferred", etc.) in the google advanced search area (it has a specific box for the site so you can just enter "centos" there if you choose to do so) you'll probably find the previous thread fairly quickly. > <snip sig stuff> HTH -- Bill

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
by Robert Heller 25 May '09

25 May '09

At Mon, 25 May 2009 10:56:13 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> wrote: > > Content-language: sv > > > ---Executing: recode > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Lanny Marcus > >Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > > > >Probably not the best distro for Laptops, > >but many people on this list are using CentOS on their laptops. > > So what's considered to be the "best" choice for laptops? I understand > mileage may vary and so on, but I think there might maybe be a general > consensus at least? > > Unfortunately I haven't had too good an experience with CentOS out-of > the-box-installs with respect to wifi-NICs on laptops, but that's also the > only thing I've been having problems with OTOH. The *Intel* WiFi-NIC (Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter) on my IBM Thinkpad X31 worked mostly out-of-the-box. I just needed to download the firmware and I was up. So did the SMC Ez Connect PCMCIA card I used on my previos laptop (I think it was a prism54 flavor), also once I snarfed the proper firmware for it. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller(a)deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
by William L. Maltby 25 May '09

25 May '09

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:56 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Lanny Marcus > >Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > > > >Probably not the best distro for Laptops, > >but many people on this list are using CentOS on their laptops. > > So what's considered to be the "best" choice for laptops? I understand > mileage may vary and so on, but I think there might maybe be a general > consensus at least? ^^^^^^^^^ Not likely on this list. More likely, a "preponderance", maybe even a "majority", but I wouldn't be surprised if even those aren't achieved. BTW, "general" is redundant with "consensus". > > <snip> -- Bill

2 1

Traffic Analyzer
by Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle 25 May '09

25 May '09

Hi Guys, My Server at Mosso has more than doubled in bandwidth over the last week. Mosso recommended getting an analyzer tool to tell me why. What can you guys recommend, easy to install and informative? Thanks! -Jason

3 2

OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years
by Lanny Marcus 25 May '09

25 May '09

My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 years.... The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it boots, there is a SMART advisory from the BIOS that says failure is immenient. Occasionally, it will not boot, because the BIOS does not see the hard drive. I replaced the EIDE cable, but the problem of sometimes not seeing the hard drive on boot continues. I suspect it has to do with something loose in the electronics of the drive, because if I press on both ends of the EIDE cable, the problem goes away and then it will boot OK. The box is currently M$ Windows only. I just booted it from my Knoppix Live CD and ran smartctl on it. Below are the results. When I ran the Maxtor Diagnostics on the hard drive, 3 times, each time the quick 90 second SMART test said that I should run the Read test, which takes about one hour. Each time I ran the Read test, it passed OK. 3 times. Should I suggest to my wife that she let me replace the hard drive, now, at her convenience, before it fails completely? Is there anything in the smartctl results that indicates that is not the appropriate thing to do, considering the length of time this problem has existed? I did not run the Maxtor Burn In test or low level format, because I do not want to reinstall everything on this hard drive. The smartctl results certainly seem to indicate something badly awry, which the Maxtor Diagnostics, on the Read only test, did not pick up. TIA! Lanny root@Knoppix:~# smartctl -d ata -H /dev/hda smartctl version 5.36 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. Failed Attributes: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x002b 222 215 223 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 29 root@Knoppix:~# smartctl -d ata -a /dev/hda smartctl version 5.36 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Maxtor DiamondMax D540X-4D Device Model: Maxtor 4D080H4 Serial Number: D40SBVYE Firmware Version: DAH017K0 User Capacity: 81,964,302,336 bytes Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 6 ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 0 Local Time is: Sun May 24 17:44:28 2009 EDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. See vendor-specific Attribute list for failed Attributes. General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. Self-test execution status: ( 64) The previous self-test completed having a test element that failed and the test element that failed is not known. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 30) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x1b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. No Conveyance Self-test supported. No Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. No General Purpose Logging support. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 51) minutes. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 202 199 063 Pre-fail Always - 18883 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 252 252 000 Old_age Always - 2809 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 239 239 063 Pre-fail Always - 37 6 Read_Channel_Margin 0x0001 253 253 100 Pre-fail Offline - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 0 8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0027 250 243 187 Pre-fail Always - 47480 9 Power_On_Minutes 0x0032 253 250 000 Old_age Always - 0h+18m 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x002b 222 215 223 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 29 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x002b 253 252 223 Pre-fail Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 249 249 000 Old_age Always - 1722 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 253 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 253 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 194 Unknown_Attribute 0x0032 253 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 24 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0008 251 251 000 Old_age Offline - 2 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0008 253 249 000 Old_age Offline - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 253 252 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0008 199 199 000 Old_age Offline - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 0 201 Soft_Read_Error_Rate 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 0 202 TA_Increase_Count 0x000a 253 251 000 Old_age Always - 0 203 Run_Out_Cancel 0x000b 253 252 180 Pre-fail Always - 0 204 Shock_Count_Write_Opern 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 0 205 Shock_Rate_Write_Opern 0x000a 253 252 000 Old_age Always - 0 207 Spin_High_Current 0x002a 239 235 000 Old_age Always - 13 208 Spin_Buzz 0x002a 245 242 000 Old_age Always - 8 209 Offline_Seek_Performnce 0x0024 253 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 99 Unknown_Attribute 0x0004 253 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 100 Unknown_Attribute 0x0004 253 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 101 Unknown_Attribute 0x0004 253 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 SMART Error Log Version: 1 Warning: ATA error count 3379 inconsistent with error log pointer 5 ATA Error Count: 3379 (device log contains only the most recent five errors) CR = Command Register [HEX] FR = Features Register [HEX] SC = Sector Count Register [HEX] SN = Sector Number Register [HEX] CL = Cylinder Low Register [HEX] CH = Cylinder High Register [HEX] DH = Device/Head Register [HEX] DC = Device Command Register [HEX] ER = Error register [HEX] ST = Status register [HEX] Powered_Up_Time is measured from power on, and printed as DDd+hh:mm:SS.sss where DD=days, hh=hours, mm=minutes, SS=sec, and sss=millisec. It "wraps" after 49.710 days. Error 3379 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 0 hours (0 days + 0 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was in an unknown state. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 04 51 01 01 a5 5a a0 Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- -------------------- 08 d6 01 01 a5 5a a0 02 03:14:14.480 DEVICE RESET b0 d6 01 9f 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:29.984 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d5 01 9f 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:29.968 SMART READ LOG b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.512 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d9 01 00 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.480 SMART DISABLE OPERATIONS Error 3378 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 0 hours (0 days + 0 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was in an unknown state. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 04 51 01 0b 4f c2 a0 Error: ABRT Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- -------------------- b0 d6 01 9f 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:29.984 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d5 01 9f 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:29.968 SMART READ LOG b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.512 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d9 01 00 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.480 SMART DISABLE OPERATIONS b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.416 SMART WRITE LOG Error 3377 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 0 hours (0 days + 0 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was in an unknown state. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 04 51 01 0b 4f c2 a0 Error: ABRT Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- -------------------- b0 d5 01 9f 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:29.968 SMART READ LOG b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.512 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d9 01 00 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.480 SMART DISABLE OPERATIONS b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.416 SMART WRITE LOG 41 ff 00 00 b9 8a e9 00 03:12:26.416 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] Error 3376 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 0 hours (0 days + 0 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was in an unknown state. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 04 51 01 0b 4f c2 a0 Error: ABRT Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- -------------------- b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.512 SMART WRITE LOG b0 d9 01 00 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.480 SMART DISABLE OPERATIONS b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.416 SMART WRITE LOG 41 ff 00 00 b9 8a e9 00 03:12:26.416 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] 41 ff 00 00 b8 8a e9 00 03:12:26.400 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] Error 3375 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 0 hours (0 days + 0 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was in an unknown state. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH DH -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 04 51 01 0b 4f c2 a0 Error: ABRT Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FR SC SN CL CH DH DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------------- -------------------- b0 d6 01 50 4f c2 a0 00 03:12:26.416 SMART WRITE LOG 41 ff 00 00 b9 8a e9 00 03:12:26.416 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] 41 ff 00 00 b8 8a e9 00 03:12:26.400 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] 41 ff 00 00 b7 8a e9 00 03:12:26.400 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] 41 ff 00 00 b6 8a e9 00 03:12:26.400 READ VERIFY SECTOR(S) [OBS-5] SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 0 - # 2 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 0 - # 3 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 997 - # 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 905 - # 5 Short offline Completed without error 00% 664 - # 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% 664 - # 7 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 1 - # 8 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 9 - # 9 Short offline Completed: unknown failure 00% 215 - #10 Short offline Completed without error 00% 215 - #11 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 213 - #12 Short offline Completed: read failure 60% 187 80417451 #13 Extended offline Completed: read failure 20% 184 80417451 #14 Short offline Completed without error 00% 181 - #15 Extended offline Completed: read failure 20% 151 80417451 #16 Short offline Completed without error 00% 151 - #17 Short offline Completed without error 00% 139 - #18 Short offline Completed: read failure 60% 45 208052 #19 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5 - #20 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 4 - #21 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3 - Device does not support Selective Self Tests/Logging root@Knoppix:~#

6 5

IMPORTANT: Issue with Linuxtag 2009
by Ralph Angenendt 25 May '09

25 May '09

Hi, due to clashing issues here at work I will not be able to make it to Linuxtag 2009, as I won't be able to get free time during that week. That at the moment leaves us with Didi and Chris Geldenhuis, which isn't enough to man a booth during 4 days. Is anyone else interested to come to man the booth there? Otherwise we might have to call it off for this year. If so it would be nice if you could subscribe to the centos-promo list <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-promo> and tell us there (or answer here). Cheers, Ralph

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss