Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

DHCP static hosts and subnet configuration
by Marcus Moeller 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Hi all. I have set up a DHCP server with multiple subnet configurations (let's say subnet A and B). Within that I have declared pools and static hosts addresses. Now, if I have set up a static host entry (with fixed-address) in Subnet B for a specific machine and try to connect to Subnet A with that NIC (where it should obtain an address from the range), this does not work unless I add a static host entry for that machine to the Subnet A declaration, too. I even have to assign a fixed-address, there. I just want the NIC to clain it's address from the range on Subnet A and to assign a fixed address on Subnet B. Best Regards Marcus

7 38

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0896 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 ruby - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2008:0896 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 ruby - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 ed - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 ed - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2008:0895-02: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 ruby security update (John Newbigin) 6. CESA-2008:0946-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 ed security update (John Newbigin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:06:28 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0896 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 ruby - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20081021160628.GA19496(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0896 ruby security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0896.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/irb-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-devel-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-docs-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-libs-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-mode-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-13.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/ruby-1.6.8-13.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update ruby Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

looking for stunnel configuration file for /etc/xinetd.d/
by Rudi Ahlers 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Hi all Does anyone have a config file for stunnel, to work with /etc/xinetd.d? Stunnel's man page does mention it can work with xinetd, but there's no sample configuration for it. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers

2 1

RHEL6
by Christopher Chan 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Any sign of a beta?

7 7

Replacement for Intel SDS2 Motherboard
by Camron W. Fox 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Alle, We have recently had one of our office servers go south. The hardware was an Intel SDS2 motherboard (EATX), Dual Intel PIII 1.4GHz FC-PGA2-L2 512KB, 3GB (6x512MB) 168 pin DIMM, SDRAM 133MHz/PC-133-ECC with 1x3Ware 7006-2 and 2x3Ware 7506-4LP RAID controllers. The OS was RHEL3. Apparently, according to the beep codes, there has been an FRB failure. I've migrated most of the services (mail,web,proxy,samba,mysql,mailman,home directories) to an interim box running CentOS 5.2. At a minimum, I need to replace the motherboard and CPUS (I'm told they are unrecoverable). All the remaining hardware I plan to re-use, as well as moving from RHEL to CentOS. Does anyone have any recommendations on replacement motherboards with CentOS 5.2 in mind, along with the re-usable hardware requirements? Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cwfox(a)us.fujitsu.com

6 9

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

1 0

Installer kernel config
by Ian Levesque 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Hello, I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility (especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a purchase decision, and reckon that seeing what's included with the installer would be the most direct way. Thanks for any leads, Ian

5 6

Slow NFS writes
by Craig White 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the following options... -P (privileged ports) intr -r=32768 -w=32768 I tried doubling the size of the read/write windows to 65536 but it seemed to make little difference. Task, Read / Write 648 Megabyte Photoshop file (PSD) Win2K = Win2K server (slow), RAID 5, Symantec EndPoint (ugh), retiring this server AFP = Netatalk from new CentOS Server SMB = Samba from new CentOS Server NFS = see above options, same CentOS Server Copy To Win2K AFP SMB NFS 1m40.053s 0m22.566s 0m23.817s 2m11.849s Copy From Win2K AFP SMB NFS 1m34.478s 0m20.709s 0m20.823s 0m23.487s NFS read performance was slightly slower than AFP/SMB but the write performance was poor. I suppose that the answer is not so important because if the performance was equal to AFP and/or SMB, they'd probably just use AFP anyway but I did want to register my shock (or my ignorance). Craig

3 5

RAID on Email Server
by Matt 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

I have an email server running Exim, Dovecot, Spamassassin, Clam, etc. on Centos 4.x 32bit. On occasion I have disk I/O problems. Its handling several domains and alot of email. Its currently on a single SATA drive. I am thinking of moving too 3 drives with RAID 1 for redundancy. RAID 1 will help me on reads but do nothing on writes as I understand. I am thinking the majority of my I/O is read though not? I imagine quotta checks and all that being done and everytime a user checks there email every message in the inbox must be read. I guess I am asking if RAID 1 will help my I/O problem much? [root@server ~]# w 12:04:02 up 2:01, 1 user, load average: 7.02, 7.47, 11.84 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT root pts/0 208.92.169.4.ppp 11:25 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w [root@server ~]# vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 2 0 1558496 456916 1087224 0 0 198 749 795 537 18 4 27 50 The above is when its running pretty good. Matt

7 8

Recent CentOS4 kernel update
by James Fidell 20 Oct '08

20 Oct '08

I see an update for the CentOS4 kernel, to 2.6.9-78.0.5.EL, has appeared over the weekend. I've not seen anything on the announce list for it though. Have I missed something? James

6 5

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss