Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Grip for CentOS 5?
by Preston Crawford 03 May '07

03 May '07

Does anyone know where you can find an RPM for this? I'm just trying to rip some MP3s on my upgraded box. The last of the things I can't do. Preston

2 2

java
by Eugene Fong 03 May '07

03 May '07

Didn't Sun Open Source most of Java. Maybe this is a route for all Linux distros to standardize Java with OpenJDK

3 2

perl-Mail-SPF Package Missing Dependency
by roya 03 May '07

03 May '07

I was spamassassin update spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.0-1.el4.rf Complete! and then,Require Perl-Package installed [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.82 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::Ident, version 1.20 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Socket::INET6, version 2.51 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Socket::SSL, version 1.05 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Compress::Zlib, version 1.42 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Time::HiRes, version 1.86 [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::DomainKeys ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::DKIM ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: DBI, version 1.50 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Getopt::Long, version 2.34 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: LWP::UserAgent, version 2.033 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: HTTP::Date, version 1.46 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Archive::Tar, version 1.30 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.05 [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Encode::Detect ('require' failed) Installed: perl-Mail-DKIM.noarch 0:0.24-1.el4.rf perl-Mail-DomainKeys.noarch 0:0.21-2.el4.at Dependency Installed: perl-Error.noarch 0:0.17008-1.el4.rf Complete! but a perl-Mail-SPF problem [root@ns ~]# yum -y install perl-Mail-SPF Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Excluding Packages from Red Hat Enterprise Linux dries - 4 - i386 Finished Excluding Packages from ATrpms RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Finished Excluding Packages from Dag RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Base Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Addons Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-4 - Extras Finished Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package perl-Mail-SPF.noarch 0:2.004-1.el4.rf set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: perl(version) for package: perl-Mail-SPF --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl(version) is needed by package perl-Mail-SPF -- royal

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Good things about CentOS 5; problem with flash in seamonkey [SOLVED]
by Mark Hull-Richter 03 May '07

03 May '07

For the interest of all concerned: The 32-bit version of Seamonkey works perfectly with the flash plugin. I haven't tested others yet, including the acrobat reader, but I have much more confidence that problems encountered there will be easily soluble. Thanks to all who contributed, especially Jim Perrin, who gave me the critical clue as to what was not working. -- Mark Hull-Richter DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 949-680-3082 - Office 949-330-7691 - fax Ask me about CentOS Linux, and escape from Windows forever!

1 0

Can't get resolution higher than 1280x1024 - Centos 5
by Paul 03 May '07

03 May '07

Hello all, I can't get higher than 1280x1024 resolution (60hz, 24 depth). I'm running Centos 5 x86 64bit on AMD Athlon64 x2 4600, Geforce 6200 PCI express. Even as root, that is the highest I can set the display. I am guessin the kernel does not support my combo? I've also tried Nvidia's driver from their site, this is what I get: # more nvidia-installer.log nvidia-installer log file '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' creation time: Mon Apr 30 22:11:36 2007 option status: license pre-accepted : false update : false force update : false expert : false uninstall : false driver info : false precompiled interfaces : true no ncurses color : false query latest version : false OpenGL header files : true no questions : false silent : false no recursion : false no backup : false kernel module only : false sanity : false add this kernel : false no runlevel check : false no network : false no ABI note : false no RPMs : false no kernel module : false force SELinux : default no X server check : false force tls : (not specified) force compat32 tls : (not specified) X install prefix : (not specified) X library install path : (not specified) X module install path : (not specified) OpenGL install prefix : (not specified) OpenGL install libdir : (not specified) compat32 install chroot : (not specified) compat32 install prefix : (not specified) compat32 install libdir : (not specified) utility install prefix : (not specified) utility install libdir : (not specified) doc install prefix : (not specified) kernel name : (not specified) kernel include path : (not specified) kernel source path : (not specified) kernel output path : (not specified) kernel install path : (not specified) proc mount point : /proc ui : (not specified) tmpdir : /tmp ftp mirror : ftp://download.nvidia.com RPM file list : (not specified) Using: nvidia-installer ncurses user interface -> License accepted. -> No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; would you li ke the installer to attempt to download a kernel interface for your kernel f rom the NVIDIA ftp site (ftp://download.nvidia.com)? (Answer: Yes) -> No matching precompiled kernel interface was found on the NVIDIA ftp site; this means that the installer will need to compile a kernel interface for your kernel. -> Performing CC sanity check with CC="cc". -> Performing CC version check with CC="cc". ERROR: Unable to find the kernel source tree for the currently running kernel. Please make sure you have installed the kernel source files for your kernel and that they are properly configured; on Red Hat Linux systems, for example, be sure you have the 'kernel-source' or 'kernel-devel' RPM installed. If you know the correct kernel source files are installed, you may specify the kernel source path with the '--kernel-source-path' command line option. ERROR: Installation has failed. Please see the file '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details. You may find suggestions on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux driver download page at www.nvidia.com.

6 15

CentOS 5.0 and jed
by Gregory P. Ennis 03 May '07

03 May '07

Everyone, Sorry for this second post but one of the members pointed out to me I had posted it in a thread belonging to a different subject. I am trying to use CentOS 5.0 in place of SCO OpenServer 5.0 as well as replacing terminal Word Perfect. I have looked at jed which is available via the Fedora extras and it appears to have what I will need. Do any of you have an CentOS 5.0 rpm for jed or know where I might find one. Thanks, Greg Ennis

1 0

rsync problems on windows
by Ruslan Sivak 03 May '07

03 May '07

I'm trying to use the CentOS server for windows backups. I want to use rsync to get the data over there. I downloaded cwrsync, but I'm having issues getting it to work. I keep getting: "Disconnecting: Timeout, server not responding." Has anyone seen anything like this? Here is a transcript: C:\Documents and Settings\Russ>rsync -vvvvvvv /cygdrive/c/temp/xr backup-db@192. 168.1.5:/home/backup-db/test cmd= machine=192.168.1.5 user=backup-db path=/home/backup-db/test cmd[0]=ssh cmd[1]=-l cmd[2]=backup-db cmd[3]=192.168.1.5 cmd[4]=rsync cmd[5]=--s erver cmd[6]=-vvvvvvv cmd[7]=. cmd[8]=/home/backup-db/test opening connection using ssh -l backup-db 192.168.1.5 rsync --server -vvvvvvv . /home/backup-db/test backup-db(a)192.168.1.5's password: Disconnecting: Timeout, server not responding. _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=242): entered rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at rsync.c(242) [sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=242): about to call exit(255) And on the server, in secure.log I get: May 2 18:08:58 localhost sshd[4337]: Accepted password for backup-db from 192.168.1.36 port 3392 ssh2 May 2 18:08:58 localhost sshd[4337]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user backup-db by (uid=0) May 2 18:08:58 localhost sshd[4339]: fatal: Write failed: Connection reset by peer May 2 18:08:58 localhost sshd[4337]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session closed for user backup-db I'm using "rsync version 2.6.7 protocol version 29" on the client. I used the lates (2.6.9 I believe), and downgraded from there, trying to get it to work. Russ

4 7

best practice backup
by D. Karapiperis 03 May '07

03 May '07

Hi there, I am using tar to backup the whole system (specific directorues usr,lib,sbin,etc,var,home,root). On bare metal recovery I install the minimal portion of the syetm and then I throw the tarballs. Any opinions? D. Karapiperis

2 1

CentOS 5 for AlphaServers?
by Rob 03 May '07

03 May '07

Hi, I use previous 4.4 version on my two Compaq AlphaServer systems. Is there a chance that CentOS 5 will also become available for Alpha? Thanks, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

8 8

More CentOS5 nVidia fun
by Bart Schaefer 03 May '07

03 May '07

In the vein of the "Can't get resolution higher than 1280x1024" and "Another CentOS 5 oddity..." threads, I just installed CentOS5 w/Xen kernel on a Sony VAIO desktop with an nVidia NV5M64 (RIVA TNT2 64 Pro) card, using an old Samsung SyncMaster 700NF monitor. system-config-display chose the highest possible resolution for the monitor and Xorg did its best to drive it, but it just isn't quite right: rhgb merely made a mess, which only sort of clears up when gdm starts. After I log in, only bits and pieces of menus and windows are painted. Rebooting single user I re-ran system-config-display and it claimed to have written 1280x1024 into xorg.conf, but in fact it didn't: it omitted the "Screen" section entirely. Rhgb was still messed up, gdm still seemed to be at some very high resolution, and then after logging in I found myself at 800x600 with no option to set the resolution higher. Three passes of switch-to-text-console-and-run system-config-display (including manually selecting my monitor) later, I finally have everything working, but only at 1024x768. If I choose any higher resolution, the repainting issues return. I won't really need the GUI very often after I get other things set up, so I'm not particularly worried about this, but I thought I'd report it for benefit of anyone else who might encounter a problem with a similar video card. I'd be interested to hear further thoughts on whether this could be a kernel issue, as suggested by Preston Crawford. (I have installed all the updates, for what that's worth).

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss