Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34753 discussions

Contemplating Move
by Mike McCarty 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

Hello, all. New to list. I hope this isn't an FAQ. I looked at the FAQs I could find, and didn't see it. I am doing contract work, and was requested to install FC2 on my machine (last October). Since doing that, I have tentatively concluded that the Fedora Core Project is more or less beta test, and not really suitable for development work. Please anyone correct me if I am wrong. So I am considering a hop to a more stable environment. Since CentOS is akin to The Product Produced By A Major Vendor Of Linux Software Who Shall Remain Nameless, I was wondering if the transition might be easier to CentOs rather than, say Debian. (Makes me feel like I'm reading a Harry Potter novel about He Who Shall Not Be Named.) Is there any reasonable hope of an "upgrade" from FC2 to CentOS 4.1 or should/must I backup, install, and restore? Thanks all in advance for replies. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

9 31

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:748 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 php - security update - UPDATED (seth vidal) 2. CESA-2005:748 Important CentOS 3 i386 php - security update - UPDATED (seth vidal) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:35:52 -0400 From: seth vidal <skvidal(a)phy.duke.edu> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:748 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 php - security update - UPDATED To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <1124660153.25978.27.camel@cutter> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:748 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html UPDATE info: This package was updated to resolve centos bug #999. The packages were not handling the mail() call correctly. The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-25.ent.centos.1.x86_64.rpm To apply these run: yum update php\* -sv

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Entries in /var/log/messages
by Jeffrey Means 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

One other method I have sucessfully used / am using is to change the port number of the service being attacked. If we are talking about ssh this can be done in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file by changing / adding a Port xxxx line to the file. I hope this helps you it has drastically decreased the number of people trying to break down my front door. --Jeff Means MeansPC - Custom Web Development for your needs. CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:03 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I have quite a few entries in /var/log/messages for connection attempts. > > Is there anything other > > than ignoring them I can do? Example is below. > > > > There are a number of scripts (some Perl, some Python) out there to > monitor the log and add an entry in hosts.deny to block any further > attempts from the offending IP when too many failed password attempts > are noted. You can find them with some "googling". > > I am using a modified one to stop these breakin attempts on my servers. > > > Aug 21 15:48:19 machine sshd(pam_unix)[17903]: check pass; user unknown > > Aug 21 15:48:19 machine sshd(pam_unix)[17903]: authentication failure; > > logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= > > rhost=wsip-24-234-149-156.lv.lv.cox.net > > > > THanks, > > > > Jerry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- > Rich Huff <rich(a)richhuff.com> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- -- Jeffrey D. Means meaje(a)meanspc.com Owner / CIO for MeansPC http://www.meanspc.com/ Custom Web Development For Your Needs. (970)308-1298 - The stupidity of a stupid person is exercised in a restricted field; the stupidity of an intelligent individual has a much broader diffusion, and far greater effect, aided as it is by the element of surprise.

4 3

Job opportunities for Linux. [OT]
by duffmckagan 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

I am currently into Engineering, and I am working slowly on my Knowledge / Know-How of Linux. I am eager to know about the Job Opportunities for people who have considerably good knowledge in Linux. This thought has popped up in my mind, due to the reason that I was watching out my Local LUG, and somebody quoted like..."There aren't much Job Opportunities for Linux Knowledge compared to the Knowledge based on Microsoft Software. Linux won't fetch you those fat salaries that Microsoft would offer, so unfortunately, you don't get what you deserve, with Linux, as the basic concept lies in Free Stuff." -- "No-one dies a virgin. Life screws everyone."

6 8

Temporary root access to another user.
by duffmckagan 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

I have Cent OS 4 installed on my computer, with cable internet. My ISP requires me to login to the account before I can access the Internet. I require to type some commands to get it working. (It comes with a software which I have installed) But that requires root access. I have many users on this computer, who can't access the Internet without my permission ( And I can't tell them the root password..NO please I have my own reasons.) Is there any way, that they don't have to type the root password (Something like Sudo) and still get access to the internet? If not they have started demanding Windows, which I don't want to install. Thank you. -- "No-one dies a virgin. Life screws everyone."

2 3

Re: [CentOS] Entries in /var/log/messages
by Jeffrey Means 22 Aug '05

22 Aug '05

CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 21:09, Jeffrey Means wrote: > > One other method I have sucessfully used / am using is to change the port number > > of the service being attacked. If we are talking about ssh this can be done in > > the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file by changing / adding a Port xxxx line to the file. > > > > I hope this helps you it has drastically decreased the number of people trying > > to break down my front door. > > --Jeff Means > > MeansPC - Custom Web Development for your needs. > > > > CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:03 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > > I have quite a few entries in /var/log/messages for connection attempts. > > > > Is there anything other > > > > than ignoring them I can do? Example is below. > > > > > > > > > > There are a number of scripts (some Perl, some Python) out there to > > > monitor the log and add an entry in hosts.deny to block any further > > > attempts from the offending IP when too many failed password attempts > > > are noted. You can find them with some "googling". > > > > > > I am using a modified one to stop these breakin attempts on my servers. > > > > > > > Aug 21 15:48:19 machine sshd(pam_unix)[17903]: check pass; user unknown > > > > Aug 21 15:48:19 machine sshd(pam_unix)[17903]: authentication failure; > > > > logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= > > > > rhost=wsip-24-234-149-156.lv.lv.cox.net > > > > > It is good to know that this type of attack against ssh is generally > automated. Most likely run by script kiddies looking for a system with > poor passwords or default passwords on that service. > > If you take the actions others have already posted you should be in good > shape. Just make sure you use non-trivial passwords, limit which users > are allowed to login into ssh, and if you want to eliminate this type of > traffic in your log files use a different port. It is important to > realize that changing the port number is not a security measure. Any > good hacker will scan your system and find it. But it does prevent > these automated scripts from finding your system for the most part. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > This is a very good point as a rule I only allow PKCS (public key) logins from offsite so I have little to worry about this particular issue, again this is a line item chage you can make in the sshd_config file. I am running two sshd servers one for internal access wich does run on port 22 but is firewalled from the outside and one on port xxxx wich only allows connections with PKCS auth. If you want a copy of my sshd startup script wich starts daemons for all the files ending in .config contained in the /etc/ssh/ directory let me know and I'll gladly make that available. Using PKCS it makes it really hard to break a password that is over 256 characters, has builtin validity tests and travels nicely on a usb key (even old small ones which makes this very inexpensive to implement even for a medium to large business.) Note to the wise: Be sure to password protect the keys issued for if they fall into the wrong hands you just gave away the keys to your server / network. -- -- Jeffrey D. Means meaje(a)meanspc.com Owner / CIO for MeansPC http://www.meanspc.com/ Custom Web Development For Your Needs. (970)308-1298 - The stupidity of a stupid person is exercised in a restricted field; the stupidity of an intelligent individual has a much broader diffusion, and far greater effect, aided as it is by the element of surprise.

1 0

nfs4 on CentSO4.1
by Tony 21 Aug '05

21 Aug '05

I'm struggling to get nfs v4 going at the moment- following instructions from http://www.brennan.id.au/19-Network_File_System.html#nfs4 Can anyone else confirm that they already have nfs4 working ok, just to give me heart to continue fighting? -- Cheers, Tony

1 0

Kernel or kernel-smp ?
by Robert 21 Aug '05

21 Aug '05

Since this is National Kernel Day, I have a question. No, 2 questions: I'm running an Asus A7N8X Deluxe ver 2 m/b with an AMD processor: [root@mavis ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ stepping : 0 cpu MHz : 1912.933 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov patpse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips : 3776.51 For some reason, Anaconda thinks I need an smp kernel. This is a wrong-headed notion that showed up in FC1 and continued to FC2, FC3 and CentOS 4. It always installs both kernels, making -smp the default which I have to change to non-smp for ntpd to work right (Gives off-the-chart jitter, never syncs, etc). I have read in one place or another that: 1. It's O.K. to run an smp kernel on a single-processor machine 2. The installer picks the smp kernel if the cpu flag "ht" is set -- which mine isn't. So, can anyone explain why, on a fresh bare-metal install I'm blessed with an smp kernel? Also, is the statement about an smp kernel running O.K. on a single processor machine pure hogwash or is there something goofy about my m/b and/or processor? Of course, once there is an -smp kernel installed "yum update kernel*" keeps the string of luck going. -- It is Sun Aug 21 09:48:33 CDT 2005 ratnow. The next Next-Step will begin in 2526087 seconds at 3:30 P.M. on Monday 9/19/2005 at the Golden Gristle ratcheer: http://snipurl.com/ag20

2 2

The scariest set up of all: Printer Support
by Dave Gutteridge 21 Aug '05

21 Aug '05

My experience with printers is that of all the peripherals, regardless of OS, they are the trickiest to install, configure, and use. So I'm expecting a battle here. What I have is a Canon Pixus iP3100. It's a Japanese model, but it's the same model as the US Canon Pixma iP3000, just a different name. First, I plugged in the USB cable. CentOS seemed to detect it, and gave me a list of options. Neither the US model number nor Japanese model number was there, so I selected "Canon (unknown)". It spent a while installing, and then finished without any message to say for sure if it had installed successfully. I tried to print from a number of application, but nothing happened. Just nothing. No error messages, no printer noises, nothing. So, I figured the driver didn't take hold. I looked around the net, and first I cam across "Turboprint for Linux". At first it seemed promising. But my first snag was that after installing the RPM, I didn't seem to have any printer configuration dialogues or anything. I went on the net to see about a manual, and *then* I discovered that in the free, consumer use version, they stamp a logo onto whatever you print. I was a little annoyed that they didn't make that really clear up front, they just tell you that commercial users must pay and consumers can use for free. Anyway, I decided to look for different alternatives. I came across a web site that said that my printer model could work under a different Canon driver: http://www.linuxprinting.org/pipermail/canon-list/2004q4/001797.html But, and here's the heart of my question, I can't find any place to make changes to my printer configuration. According to some web sites I looked at, I should have a printer configuration application in my menu, under "Preferences". But all I have is a "printer settings" application which, despite the promising name, doesn't have any menu options at all for configuring the printer or it's drivers. It looks more like a print spool manager for when you have print jobs lined up. Where/how do I configure my printer and try alternate drivers? Dave

11 49

Yum still won't behave.
by Dave Gutteridge 21 Aug '05

21 Aug '05

Before I reported that YUM often crashed. I was given help here on this list which stopped YUM from freezing my computer. However, YUM is still not behaving. Recently, I went to install a program called transcode. Yum found 14 packages that needed to be installed. It installed one of them and then stopped. It gave me this error: /sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libk3bdevice.so.2.0.0.#prelink#.X8kEMh is empty, not checked. So, I went to /etc/sysconfig/prelink and set PRELINKING=no, because I was told that this would stop that error message from coming up. I went back to YUM to isntall the application, it found the remaining 13 packages to install, got as far as installing one, then the same error message came up and it stopped again. I rechecked that I had properly edted the prelink file, and tried again. This time, it found the remaining 12 files to install, gave no error message, but nonetheless it stopped after installing one package. And so on. Eventually to install the application I had to run YUM 14 times to get all 14 packages. What could be wrong with my isntallation of YUM? Dave

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss