Jerry Geis wrote:
>> I had a similar problem trying to set 1400x1050 on a Siemens Fujitsu
>> Laptop. The fix for me, was to use 915 resolution from
>> http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/ as it seems the Intel video bios
>> has a limited set of resolution modes
>
>> Hope this helps
>
>> Dean
>
> Dean,
>
> THanks I have 1 question. on centso 4.2 X starts real early...
> Where do you run the 915resolution command? I put it in
> rc.local and it did not seem to work.
>
> THanks,
>
> Jerry
That's where I put it and it worked fine.
I tested first by booting to run level 3 running "915resolution 4b 1400
1050" and then started X. This worked so I just added the same command
to rc.local. The desktop now boots by default to 1400x1050 in run level
5.
My tests were on Siemens Fujitsu Laptop E8020D with Centos 3.6 and I had
to replace XFree86 with the latest development version before using
915resolution as I could not get X to display anything other than a
black screen, even with the vesa driver.
Dean.
I have a dell 1200 laptop. How do I tell X to use the external VGA port
by default
and not the LCD?
I have looked in the bios and there is nothing.
Jerry
List, I've just installed CentOS 4.2 (alpha) on a ES40, 4 processor 833
MHz, 2 GB ram and when I rebooted the server it simple didn't boot...
Any ideas of my problem?
Regards;
Israel
greetings
would someone please point me to an excellent server exercising, stressing,
and/or testing program that will run on centos 4?
i want one that will not out and out destroy a machine so to speak...
...meaning testing is one thing, yet pounding a box in the hard drive
department over and above the cause or unnecessarily does not appeal to me.
fyi the box i want to test/stress this time is a compaq dl380 with 2 gig ram
and 4 drives in raid5 for simple internet services
thanks and kind regards,
- rh
--
Robert Hanson - Abba Communications
Computer & Internet Services
(509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
The Mersenne project has a TortureTest mode that has helped
me find how far I can overclock CPU or RAM without running into errors.
It runs massive calculations and compares the results with pre-known
values. If this is run while a disk I/O and graphics test run, the collision
problems between these memory users can be (hopefully) caught
without regard to whether you overclock or not.
See: http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner(a)gai-tronics.com
(610)796-5838
>>> jlb17(a)duke.edu 11/22/05 02:34PM >>>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 at 11:30am, Robert wrote
> } It might be useful if you specify what aspects of the box you want to
> } test.
> }
> } CPU? RAM? Disk?
> }
> } You mentioned disk, but is that all that you want to test?
> }
> } Regards,
> } Greg
>
> i wish to test it all, everything, just not ummm extremely violently in
> terms of hard drive(s).
>
> so, if the hard drive testing part is ultimately configurable that would be
> great... i just dont feel like pounding the drives for hours and hours
>
> ummmmmmmmmm what are people using in this area?
>
> i am familiar with memtest and some of the other small stuff yet i am
> looking for practical list wisdom on this whole scenartio.
>
> thanks!
I've actually had pretty good luck with this little script:
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/memtest.html
It's not *too* hard on the disks, although that part isn't configurable.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS(a)centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
I've just installed my first system with a SATA drive and I've noticed that
smartctl isn't supported under libata
According to the smartmontools home page, SATA will require a patch that is
still in development.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6983#comment-126714
"The patch is still under development and it is probably best to make sure
that the disk is idle before trying smartmontools." Isn't a glowing
endorsement, besides the system only has 1 hard drive.
Under CentOS 4.1
# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-2.6.9-5.0.3.EL
kernel-utils-2.4-13.1.48
I also tried the CentOS 4.2 kernel (and kernel-utils) with similar results.
# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-2.6.9-22.EL
kernel-utils-2.4-13.1.69
Thanks,
Mark
Does anybody know the gnome program that you can write in latex with please?
I'm not sure but I think its in the base repo. Its not winefish as it
(winefish) doesn't compile the source text like the program that I'm looking
for does.
Hopefully thanks
Sharon.
--
16:41:46 up 1 day, 16:56, 2 users, load average: 1.54, 1.45, 1.51
A taste of linux http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
Centos 4.2, KDE 3.4.3-1.0, OpenOffice 2.0
Registered Linux user 334501
>I had a similar problem trying to set 1400x1050 on a Siemens Fujitsu
> Laptop. The fix for me, was to use 915 resolution from
>http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/ as it seems the Intel video bios has
>a limited set of resolution modes
>Hope this helps
>Dean
Dean,
THanks I have 1 question. on centso 4.2 X starts real early...
Where do you run the 915resolution command? I put it in
rc.local and it did not seem to work.
THanks,
Jerry
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am attempting to setup a dell inspirons 1200 laptop
> media accelerator 900 from intel is the chipset so I am using the i810
> driver.
> In the default 1024x768 everything is fine.
>
> I am trying to setup the external port not the LCD to be 1366x768.
> I added a modeline to xorg.conf of:
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Monitor0"
> VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
> ModelName "LCD Panel 1600x1200"
> HorizSync 31.5 - 90.0
> VertRefresh 60.0 - 60.0
> ModeLine "1024x768" 65.0 1024 1048 1184 1344 768 771 777
> 806 -hsync -vsync
> ModeLine "1024x768" 54.2 1024 1048 1184 1344 768 771 777
> 806 -hsync -vsync
> ModeLine "1366x768" 85.5 1366 1494 1624 1798 768 770 776
> 795 -hsync +vsync
> Option "dpms"
> EndSection
>
> There is a line in the log file of:
> (II) I810(0): Monitor0: Using hsync range of 31.00-70.00 kHz
> (II) I810(0): Monitor0: Using vrefresh range of 50.00-85.00 Hz
> (II) I810(0): Not using mode "1366x768" (no mode of this name)
> (II) I810(0): Not using built-in mode "1600x1200" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) I810(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x1024" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (1366x768,Monitor0) mode clock 100000MHz exceeds DDC maximum 110MHz
> (1600x1200,Monitor0) mode clock 162MHz exceeds DDC maximum 110MHz
> (II) I810(0): 6632 kBytes additional video memory is required to
>
> I looked at the specs of the media 900 and it does something like
> 25XXx10XX
>
> What am I not setting up correctly to see the 1366x768?
>
> THanks so much,
>
> Jerry
I had a similar problem trying to set 1400x1050 on a Siemens Fujitsu
Laptop. The fix for me, was to use 915 resolution from
http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/ as it seems the Intel video bios has
a limited set of resolution modes
Hope this helps
Dean
There is some pine rpm for release 4? Im too used to it and I dont like
mutt.
--
Roger D. Vargas
http://dsgp.blogspot.com | Linux, programación, juegos
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es