Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

RE: [CentOS] Switch to Nvidia from ATI
by Bisbal, Prentice 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

If oyu really want to take advantage of the performance those cards have to offer, you should use the nvidia (that's the actual module name used by X) driver downloaded directly from NVidia. It makes a world of difference in performance, is easy to install, and is completely distribution neutral. It will work fine with XFree86 or X.org http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html -- Prentice ________________________________ From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of BRUCE STANLEY Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:01 AM To: Centos Linux Subject: [CentOS] Switch to Nvidia from ATI I am having some issues (e.g. System lock ups) with my ATI 9250 Video card. I am thinging about replacing it with either a Nvidia FX5200, FX5500, or a FX5600 card. Is anyone using one of these cards on Centos 4.1 with the stock (XORG) nv driver? The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety.

4 4

RE: [CentOS] yum repository and createrepo
by Bowie Bailey 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Ken Leyba wrote: > I've setup a local yum repository for about 25 workstations and I'm > using rsync from a local mirror. Do I need to create my own XML > headers, i.e. the 'repodata' directory, or since I'm syncing the whole > updates directory can I use the 'repodata' directory from the mirror? > > I also have a question on using createrepo. The directory layout is: > > ~/updates/ > ~/updates/headers/ > ~/updates/repodata/ > ~/updates/RPMS/ > > If I do the following in the 'updates' directory: > > # createrepo -v ./RPMS > > The 'repodata' diretcory is created under the 'RPMS' directory and not > the current 'updates' directory. How can I have the 'repodata' > directory created/updated in the correct directory under 'updates'? > Right now I'm manually moving the directory. I would probably need to > do this in my daily cron job. Check out Yam. You can get it via yum from the rpmforge repository. It can automatically update the repos, create the headers, and it even comes with an Apache config file that you can use to serve the repos to your other machines. http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/yam/ -- Bowie

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Switch to Nvidia from ATI
by Bisbal, Prentice 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Reposting in correct thread: One thing I forgot to include in my previous post - be sure to read the documentation and look at NVidia's example XF86Config file (or whatever x.org calls it) - certain modules need to be disabled (dri, something else that I forget...). It's no big deal, since the nvidia module provides this functionality. -- Prentice ________________________________ From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bisbal, Prentice Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:06 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: RE: [CentOS] Switch to Nvidia from ATI If oyu really want to take advantage of the performance those cards have to offer, you should use the nvidia (that's the actual module name used by X) driver downloaded directly from NVidia. It makes a world of difference in performance, is easy to install, and is completely distribution neutral. It will work fine with XFree86 or X.org http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html -- Prentice ________________________________ From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of BRUCE STANLEY Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:01 AM To: Centos Linux Subject: [CentOS] Switch to Nvidia from ATI I am having some issues (e.g. System lock ups) with my ATI 9250 Video card. I am thinging about replacing it with either a Nvidia FX5200, FX5500, or a FX5600 card. Is anyone using one of these cards on Centos 4.1 with the stock (XORG) nv driver? The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety. The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety.

1 0

RE: [CentOS] files in a directory limitation
by Bisbal, Prentice 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Oops. I repled to the wrong e-mail. Sorry. -- Prentice -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bisbal, Prentice Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:15 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: RE: [CentOS] files in a directory limitation One thing I forgot to include in my previous post - be sure to read the documentation and look at NVidia's example XF86Config file (or whatever x.org calls it) - certain modules need to be disabled (dri, something else that I forget...). It's no big deal, since the nvidia module provides this functionality. -- Prentice -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Barbosa Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:22 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] files in a directory limitation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:59:56PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Just curious but is there a limitation on the number of files in a > directory? I am using ext3. > > I'm not concerned about file size just the number of files. I don't think there is actually a hardcoded limit, but I'm not sure. I can say for certain that 20000 files will work, but that is as high as I ever got. I can also say for certain that having that many file on a single directory is slow as hell, and would never do it again. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFNRFCpdyWzQ5b5ckRAi4yAJ93ZN5GdOxm7y5k756czRIP3vtRKgCbBr3P aL5cmhvxKLcwGl6ZxX8TeZI= =1kWd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety.

1 0

RE: [CentOS] files in a directory limitation
by Bisbal, Prentice 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

One thing I forgot to include in my previous post - be sure to read the documentation and look at NVidia's example XF86Config file (or whatever x.org calls it) - certain modules need to be disabled (dri, something else that I forget...). It's no big deal, since the nvidia module provides this functionality. -- Prentice -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Barbosa Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:22 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] files in a directory limitation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:59:56PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Just curious but is there a limitation on the number of files in a > directory? I am using ext3. > > I'm not concerned about file size just the number of files. I don't think there is actually a hardcoded limit, but I'm not sure. I can say for certain that 20000 files will work, but that is as high as I ever got. I can also say for certain that having that many file on a single directory is slow as hell, and would never do it again. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFNRFCpdyWzQ5b5ckRAi4yAJ93ZN5GdOxm7y5k756czRIP3vtRKgCbBr3P aL5cmhvxKLcwGl6ZxX8TeZI= =1kWd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The contents of this communication, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication in its entirety.

1 0

I/O resource -- not free --- IRDA problems?
by Robert Moskowitz 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

I get a message while booting of: ide2: I/O resource 0x3EE-0x3EE not free. ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe Googling for this, I find it is relatively common, and on different laptops. I thought it might be my internal SD reader causing the problems, but these other notebooks do not have such devices. Then I found: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pb22/I8600/ and: " IrDA - works except on COM3 / ttyS2 It appears that *ttyS2* (the FC2 default) does not work as the IrDA - on boot it reports `*ttyS2 at I/O 0x3e8 (irq = 0) is a 16550A*' and `*ide2: I/O resource 0x3EE-0x3EE not free.*', `*ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe*'. As such, during *POST* press *F2* and *Alt-P* 3 times and set the IrDA to *COM2* or *COM4* (which select *IRQ 3* with *I/O 0x2f8* or *0x2e8* on *ttyS1* or *ttyS3* - ra3 is the latter). Edit */etc/pcmcia/config.opts* to `*exclude irq 3*' (so that the IRQ is free) and */etc/sysconfig/irda* to set `*DEVICE=/dev/ttyS3*' (or *1*), and run `*chkconfig irda on*' so that it starts on reboot (or `*/etc/rc.d/init.d/irda start*' or `*irattach /dev/ttyS3 -s*'). It should load *ircomm_sir*, *sir_dev*, *irnet*, *ppp_generic*, *slhc*, *ircomm_tty*, *ircomm*, *irda*, *irtty_sir* and *crc_ccitt*, and */var/log/messages* should have" Now I have already put ttyS2 on irq3 (from dmseg): ttyS2 at I/O 0x3e8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A How do I test the IRDA?

1 0

removing multiple packages
by Rajeev R Veedu 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Can someone in the list guide me how do I remove an RPM file which is installed 2 times. Following are the error: [root@Gateway Samba64-23c]# rpm -e samba-common error: "samba-common" specifies multiple packages and rpm -qa |grep samba gives as below samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E-9 samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E-9 It list 2 times the same package and I can not remove them. Could you please help me? Thanks Rajeev

4 4

Whereis Pessulus?
by Jordi Espasa Clofent 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hi all, I'm mounting a LTSP server whith CentOS 4.4. The default desktop will be Gnome. I'm looking for lockdown tool and I think Pessulus maybe a good option, but I don't found it with yum. ¿Is Pessulus included in CentOS? ¿Another lockdown tools as alternatives? Thanks in advance. -- Jordi Espasa Clofent PGP id 0xC5ABA76A #http://pgp.mit.edu/ FSF Associate Member id 4281 #http://www.fsf.org/

2 1

CentOS 2.1 on i586
by Aleksandar Milivojevic 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

I've just attempted to reinstall my ancient laptop that has Pentium MMX processor. Since it is ancient, I've decided to go with CentOS 2.1. Got stuck, installer claims I need at least i686. Hmmm... I know that 3.8 and 4.4 work without a glitch on i586, so this came as surprise. I even thing original RHEL2.1 might had support for i586 too (but I might be wrong). Anyhow, what happened with i586 in CentOS 2.1?

6 10

make 3.79.1 assertion failed error
by Dag Wieers 17 Oct '06

17 Oct '06

Hi, Sorry for cross-posting but I need to tap into my most helpful mailinglists for this problem. I have had assertion failed errors from make before and never understood what they were or where they came from. But now that I have them consistently for ffmpeg and mplayer on everything smaller than FC2, which prevents me from updating both mplayer and ffmpeg (and I know lots of other applications have the same issue). The exact error is: make: expand.c:489: allocated_variable_append: Assertion `current_variable_set_list->next != 0' failed. By coincidence (called Google) I found this page: http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/faq.html#faq.make_dies and it made the relation with make 3.79.1 pretty clear. (fc1, el3, rh9, rh7 and el2 all use make 3.79.1) I was wondering if anyone knows of a better solution than explained in the valgrind FAQ, or better than upgrading make. Once upon a time mplayer built without this assertion, other applications as well. So is this caused by a more recent configure/autotools used by the developers ? Some way to prevent this ? Anyone ? :) Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss