virt July 2014

virt@lists.centos.org

22 participants
16 discussions

Can KVM and VirtualBox co-exist on same host?
by James B. Byrne 20 Aug '14

20 Aug '14

CentOS-6.5 VirtualBox-4.3.14 Is it possible, and if so advisable, to run KVM and VirtualBox guests on the same host system? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

5 4

C7 with Xen support
by Volnei 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi all, Anybody could me tell when CentoOS7 will have Xen support? Thank a lot

5 5

Xen 4.4.1-rc1+ rebase
by George Dunlap 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

I've got a first cut of the rebase here: git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball: http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-extfiles/polarssl-1.1.4-gpl.tgz And you'll need a tarball based on (unfortunately) a private tree, which you can find here: git://github.com/gwd/xen base/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC This branch is based on upstream ee81dda (the current staging-4.4), with an additional two backported commits. To reproduce the tarball, checkout the above branch, then: ./configure make -C tools qemu-xen-dir-find make -C tools qemu-xen-traditional-find make src-tarball A couple of notes: * I haven't actually had time to test this yet! This is just so we're not totally duplicating work... * This does not have XSA-100 in it yet, so it's not quite ready for release. -George

2 4

KVM integrated network (user mode) dying after inactivity
by Timo Schöler 03 Aug '14

03 Aug '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi list, I searched the web for bug reports regarding this phenomenon I see on *multiple* machines of a customer, however, I didn't find an exact fit. So, I'd like to ask here whether anyone else has run into this. I have multiple CentOS 6 machines running using KVM to virtualize a bunch of machines on them (LVM-based). Software releases as following: [root@fe00 ~]# rpm -qa|egrep '(virt|kvm)' virt-viewer-0.5.6-8.el6_5.3.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.10.2-29.el6_5.7.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.10.2-29.el6_5.7.x86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64 libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.7.x86_64 python-virtinst-0.600.0-18.el6.noarch [root@fe00 ~]# uname -r 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 The VMs (here: two) have the "default" connection provided by KVM (heading to the internet) as well as a bridged interface to connect to a high performance backbone, where sensitive data is kept and bandwidth is an issue (or better, not :), on a second interface within the VMs: [root@fe00 ~]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br1 8000.001b21xxxxxx yes eth1 vnet1 vnet3 virbr0 8000.525400xxxxxx yes virbr0-nic vnet0 vnet2 br1 is the interface connected to the backbone, virbr0 KVM's user mode network. After some time of inactivity on the virbr0 interface, from *within* the VMs connection is *lost*. The interface(s) lose their IP; running dhclient(8) is not of any use. To get the machine back onto track, ``service libvirtd restart'' has to be issued: Vanished iptables rules show up again. (This, in contrast to an Ubuntu document [0], fixes it without shutting the VM(s) down.) Starting dhclient(8) within the VMs gets connectivity back. Just out of curiosity I let one of the VMs cause some ICMP traffic now and then hit the interface -- ``ping -i 10 some.nice.host'' is sufficient to keep that interface alive. The virbr0-headed interfaces are almost only being used to get updates etc -- management and load-balanced services are being served by the bridged interface. Is this a bug or a feature? Best, Timo [0] -- https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM/Networking#Network_Bridge_Losing_Conn… -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EAREIAAYFAlOPaBgACgkQuSPmkPhAW0r9lgD/cgsDSxaOlD150DLbF+PIGjS7 3qSv3rob7NQEz4wJkUIA/1KfjLmCGm1y2LLroFsWbfckTnDfN3LSG1sUNvygLB/C =ZhOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

Frequent Kernel Oops' on CentOS 6 / Xen
by Daniel Bradler 30 Jul '14

30 Jul '14

Hi, we have a couple of nodes based on CentOS 6 and Xen4CentOS. Unfortunately some of these nodes keep crashing frequenly. We use the latest versions: # uname -r 3.10.43-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 # xm info host : vserver20 release : 3.10.43-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 version : #1 SMP Mon Jun 16 14:22:02 UTC 2014 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 24 nr_nodes : 2 cores_per_socket : 6 threads_per_core : 2 cpu_mhz : 2400 hw_caps : bfebfbff:2c100800:00000000:00003f40:009ee3fd:00000000:00000001:00000000 virt_caps : hvm hvm_directio total_memory : 65527 free_memory : 22692 free_cpus : 0 xen_major : 4 xen_minor : 2 xen_extra : .4-33.el6 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler : credit xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset : unavailable xen_commandline : dom0_mem=2560M,max:3072M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all cc_compiler : gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) cc_compile_by : mockbuild cc_compile_domain : centos.org cc_compile_date : Mon Jun 16 17:22:14 UTC 2014 xend_config_format : 4 Our configuration looks as follows: Grub: title CentOS (3.10.43-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64) root (hd0,1) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=2560M,max:3072M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all module /vmlinuz-3.10.43-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 ro root=/dev/sda1 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=de-latin1-nodeadkeys crashkernel=auto module /initramfs-3.10.43-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.img /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp (xend-unix-server yes) (xend-relocation-server no) (xend-relocation-hosts-allow '^localhost$ ^localhost\\.localdomain$') (network-script network-bridge) (vif-script vif-bridge) (dom0-min-mem 1024) (enable-dom0-ballooning no) (total_available_memory 0) (dom0-cpus 0) (vncpasswd '') I've attached the logfile information regarding the latest crash as crash.log? Does anybody has an idea how to solve these issues? Kind Regards Daniel Bradler

2 1

SIG IRC meeting today at 2pm UK time - call for agenda items / attendees
by Lars Kurth 29 Jul '14

29 Jul '14

Hi all, we do have an IRC SIG meeting scheduled for 2pm UK today. George is in the US and may not be able to join as the call is early. It also looks as if I may not be able to join. Are there any items to discuss? If so, please raise anything you want to discuss Who is planning to join? Raise your hand in the next hour If I don't get items/participants, I suggest we cancel today's call Regards Lars

2 2

Re: [CentOS-virt] Can KVM and VirtualBox co-exist on same host?
by Elliot Speck 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

> you'll probably have to pull the VirtualBox guest addons out... and install the KVM guest stuff If you're taking that route, I recommend looking in to libguestfs to mount the image like you would a disk. -- Elliot Speck http://elliot.pro/ --- Original Message --- From: "Scott Dowdle" <dowdle(a)montanalinux.org> Sent: 25 July 2014 12:43 am To: byrnejb(a)harte-lyne.ca, "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt(a)centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Can KVM and VirtualBox co-exist on same host? Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > A supplemental question: Is there any way to convert a VB guest image into a > KVM guest image? I believe qemu-image can convert between a few different virtualization disk image formats. Of course that just changes the disk image itself... and not the drivers inside... so if you do convert it (I'd recommend working on a copy)... then you'll probably have to pull the VirtualBox guest addons out... and install the KVM guest stuff... but it shouldn't be that difficult. TYL, -- Scott Dowdle 704 Church Street Belgrade, MT 59714 (406)388-0827 [home] (406)994-3931 [work] _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

1 0

Re: [CentOS-virt] Can KVM and VirtualBox co-exist on same host?
by James B. Byrne 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

On Wed, July 23, 2014 10:11, Tom Bishop wrote: > That is the easy answer, they do conflict but it does not mean you > cannot load them both up. You just cannot run them both at the same > time, in order to run one vs the other you need to remove some kernal > mods and insert some etc depending on which one you want to run. > > So the answer is yes you can if you want to you just have to do some > work, here is a decent write up that goes into some detail but there > may be some better examples - > http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/kvm-virtualbox.html > Thanks, I found a write up on scripts that detect and unload/load the kvm and kvm-intel modules. In fact, the very one that you referenced. And I had already gathered that one probably cannot run both a kvm and a vb hypervisor on the same host at the same time. I was wondering if there was any other issues respecting having both of them installed on the same host at the same time even if only one, or neither, is running? A supplemental question: Is there any way to convert a VB guest image into a KVM guest image? The VM image in question is MicroSoft's IE6 development image for MS-XPproSP3. We have a government mandated program that is written in J# and the last OS to support that is XP. I have to get some sort of virtualised XP guest running and as the transferable licenses for that OS are somewhat scarce I thought I might try and get the legal VM version running. However, I would prefer to stick with KVM if at all possible. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

DomUs error when stopping xendomains
by Karl Johnson 22 Jul '14

22 Jul '14

Hello, I have the following error with Xen 4.2.4-33 when stopping xendomains: Shutting down Xen domains: Domain-0(skip) xen101(save).. xen101(save)............ xen102(save). An error occurred while saving domain: Error: Domain '9' does not exist. ! (shut). An error occurred while shutting down domain: Error: Domain '9' does not exist. ! xen102(save)............ xen103(save). An error occurred while saving domain: Error: Domain '11' does not exist. ! (shut). An error occurred while shutting down domain: Error: Domain '11' does not exist. ! After reading a bit on Google I've found that this can be fixed by changing the LIST_GREP in xendomains: +LIST_GREP='^(domain$\|(domid\|(name\|^{$\|"name":\|"domid":' -LIST_GREP='((domain\|(domid\|(name\|^{$\|"name":\|"domid":' This fix works. Is this a known bug in the xen4centos release? Karl

1 0

Re: [CentOS-virt] Centos 7 KVM questions
by Tom Bishop 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Clean install of centos 7 and I have most things working, however the > default virbr0 interface is not getting any addressing. The interface > in network manager just spins and spins and never gets an address. I > thought at first it was something about firewalld which I am trying to > come up to speed with but I do not believe that is the issues. > > I guess the questions that I have is what is the correct way to add > KVM and all of the virt packages to a minimal centos 7 installation. > I would like to understand bridged interfaces vs the nat interfaces > what what needs to be installed/configured. > > Thanks in advance. I think I have found the information, in the RHEL documentation - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ht… but I have to chuckle that it appears they have not fully updated the information beacause of this blurb: To create a bridge (br0) based on the eth0 interface, execute the following command on the host: # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 what the heck is an eth0 interface, they already took that away too ;)

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

virt July 2014