17 Sep
2008
17 Sep
'08
7:15 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Jeff jlar310@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeff jlar310@gmail.com wrote:
Our experience with HZ=100 in 4.6 kernels was nearly perfect time sync, at least to within a second over one week. Not so with divider=10. I will grab the -78 SRPM and give it a spin.
That is very interesting. This is the first time I've heard about the difference between the two with regard to timekeeping problems. Please keep us informed of your testing.
Akemi