On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml@conversis.de> wrote:
On 10/16/2010 08:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0100, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
Hi Karanbir,
On 14 October 2010 19:59, Karanbir Singhmail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and
features....now
that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some numbers on that.
I have done some testing some time ago on one of the EQ machines that I got from hetzner.de. Full spec of the machine was as following:
Note that 64bit Xen guests should be HVM, not PV, for best performance. Xen HVM guests obviously still need to have PV-on-HVM drivers installed.
32bit Xen guests can be PV.
Hm, why would HVM be faster than PV for 64 bit guests?
Regards, Dennis
lol, there's seems to be a lot of hearsay surrounding performance and Xen.
Grant McWilliams
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems.