On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Zoltan Frombach zoltan@frombach.comwrote:
I've also heard that older versions of Windows don't put the CPU to "idle mode" even when there is nothing to do. It is a known problem with older Windows kernels.
Windows 98 and the like don't idle. It requires software to help idle the CPU usage. So I've read - I believe a table on the libvirt site says Win98 is no longer possible.
Anyway, try to install the latest virtio drivers for Windows if you don't already have.
I have a WinXP Pro 32bit VM with virtio drivers and it runs just fine. I don't watch the load on it, so I don't know if its CPU goes idle. I'll have to take a peek at it next week.
Is the OP absolutely certain that there is no process running that would consume that small amount of CPU? I'd be more concerned if the usage was 10% or greater when the system _should_ be idle.
On 12/7/2012 9:18 PM, Robert Dinse wrote:
About the only thing you can do is not run Windows, or at leastthat
version, XP does the same thing, continuouslys spins the CPU when there
aren't
any user processes using time. I've heard this is resolved in Windows-7
but
haven't tried it personally.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and
Hosting.
Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or scriptreaders.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800)
246-6874.
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Shawn Everett wrote:
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:02:14 -0800 From: Shawn Everett shawn@tandac.com Reply-To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
<centos-virt@centos.org>To: centos-virt@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-virt] (no subject)
Hi All,
I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 with QEMU+KVM for Virtualization.
I have successfully created a Windows 2003 VM with 4GB of RAM. The host server is an HP ML350 G8 with 24GB RAM and 24 cores. Details of one of the cores is shown below:
processor : 23 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz stepping : 7 cpu MHz : 1200.000 cache size : 15360 KB physical id : 1 siblings : 12 core id : 5 cpu cores : 6 apicid : 43 initial apicid : 43 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall
nx
pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est
tm2
ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx
lahf_lm
ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 3989.86 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
On an otherwise completely idle system I've noticed the load to be 1.0
to
1.5 range. Running "top" shows the culprit to be: qemu-kvm.
Is this normal behavior? I would have expected the load to be pretty
light.
Stopping the VM restores the load to normal once again.
Is there anything I can do to reduce the load?
Shawn
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt