Is the one that is slow the one that has 2g resident?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Sun, 19 May 2013, compdoc wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 22:15:55 -0600 From: compdoc compdoc@hotrodpc.com To: 'Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS' centos-virt@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] VM Slowness
-----Original Message----- From: Robert Dinse [mailto:nanook@eskimo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: compdoc@hotrodpc.com; Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] VM Slowness
How about a top on the host? Could the virtual machine be getting swapped out on the host?
Good question. There is another VM on the host without this issue, but here's top from the host:
top - 22:11:52 up 1 day, 6:00, 1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.34, 0.29 Tasks: 175 total, 3 running, 172 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 4.3%us, 0.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 94.5%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 8001476k total, 7794800k used, 206676k free, 284212k buffers Swap: 10620924k total, 156k used, 10620768k free, 4390824k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2983 libvirt- 20 0 4373m 2.0g 7392 R 33 26.1 626:39.45 kvm
3385 libvirt- 20 0 3405m 574m 6868 S 15 7.4 263:01.62 kvm
36 root 25 5 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 19:24.48 ksmd
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt