On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:39 AM, George Dunlap dunlapg@umich.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar lsm5@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Moving this discussion to centos-virt@ as it's upto the SIG to decide on how this moves ahead.
I'm hoping to have 2 new koji tag sets:
virt7-docker-fedora-* (will have fedora rpms rebuilt) virt7-docker-el-* (will have rhel candidate builds before they are released or land in centos extras)
The -el-* repos will help to have Virt SIG as sort of an upstream and early QA for both RHEL and CentOS extras.
If the SIG is ok with it, I'll check with CBS guys to create these 2 tags.
See below message to centos-devel@ and http://centos-devel.1051824.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-devel-docker-and-docker-lat... for background
I think having the RHEL version makes sense; but I'm not sure exactly what we gain from having a version labelled "fedora". If someone wanted the Fedora docker, why wouldn't they just install Fedora? And if in this case "Fedora" really just stands for "Recently stable docker", then we should probably just come up with another name for it that describes it better (even if in the end it turns out to be a straight re-building of the Fedora RPM).
I pesonally do this kind of backporting, a *lot* with Perl and Python modules. They're often sadly out of date on a RHEL production grade system, but switching to a Fedora base for your production environments can get really flakey, really fast due to the immense churn of that operating system.