26 May
2009
26 May
'09
7:32 p.m.
----- "Francisco Pérez" fperez.x@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all of you. Just with the nonsparse option works all right.
Then an LVM+nonsparse+phy will be the better setup?
Regards.
Yes, except sparseness is only relevant to file-backed vbds in normal use. (There could ostensibly be a similar lazy block allocation option for a target on something like a SAN/NAS and you would expect some performance degradation for some writes.)
--
Christopher G. Stach II