On 20/10/10 7:01 PM, "Grant McWilliams" grantmasterflash@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Tom Bishop bishoptf@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I'd like to help, since most folks have Intel Chipsets, I have a AMD 4p(16 core)/32gig memory opteron server that I'm running that we can get some numbers on....but it would be nice if we could run apples to apples...I have iozone loaded and can run that but would be nice to run using the same parameters....is there any way we could list the types of test we would like to run and the actual command with options listed and then we would have some thing to compare at least level the playing field...KB, any thoughts, is this a good idea?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 10/20/2010 12:35 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Being skeptical is the best approach in the absence of verifiable/falsifiable data. Today or tomorrow I'll get my hands on a new host system and although it is supposed to go into production immediately I will probably find some time to do some rudimentary benchmarking in that regard to see if this is worth investigating further. Right now I'm
That sounds great. I've got a machine coming online in the next few days as well and will do some testing on there. Its got 2 of these :
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310
So not the newest/greatest, but should be fairly representative.
planning to use fio for block device measurements but don't know any decent (and uncomplicated) network i/o benchmarking tools. Any ideas what tools I could use to quickly get some useful data on this from the machine?
iozone and openssl speed tests are always a good thing to run as a 'warm up' to your app level testing. Since pgtest has been posted here already, I'd say that is definitely one thing to include so it creates a level of common-code-testing and comparison. mysql-bench is worth hitting as well. I have a personal interest in web app delivery, so a apache-bench hosted from an external machine hitting domU's / VM's ( but more than 1 instance, and hitting more than 1 VM / domU at the same time ) would be good to have as well.
And yes, publish lots of machine details and also details on the code / platform / versions used. I will try to do the same ( but will limit my testing to whats already available in the distro )
thanks
- KB
So what we're on the verge of doing here is creating a test set... I'd love to see a shell script that ran a bunch of tests, gathered data about the system and then created an archive that would then be uploaded to a website which created graphs. Dreaming maybe but it would be consistent. So what goes in our testset?
Just a generic list, add to or take away form it..
- phoronix test suite ?
- iozone
- kernbench
- dbench
- bonnie++
- iperf
- nbench
The phoronix test suite has most tests in it in addition to many many others. Maybe a subset of those tests with the aim of testing Virtualization would be good?
Grant McWilliams
+1 for the Phoronix test suite. I was going to suggest it too. http://phoronix-test-suite.com/
It can publish stats to a central server which the phoronix folks maintain, and it records the details of the server on which the test was performed. Not sure if it's smart enough to detect a VM though. My experience with it has been limited so far but generally positive.
This isn't my data, but I think it's a good example of how pts can be used to compare results from different tests and scenarios. http://global.phoronix-test-suite.com/?k=profile&u=justapost-29384-19429... 61
Regards, Kelvin