On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Jeff jlar310@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeff jlar310@gmail.com wrote:
Our experience with HZ=100 in 4.6 kernels was nearly perfect time sync, at least to within a second over one week. Not so with divider=10. I will grab the -78 SRPM and give it a spin.
That is very interesting. This is the first time I've heard about the difference between the two with regard to timekeeping problems. Please keep us informed of your testing.
Just wanted to let you (and anyone who is interested) know that Tru has kindly offered kernel-vm for -78 and -78.0.1 in his usual place:
http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/4/
Akemi