*Kai Schaetzl* wrote on *Thu, Mar 5 13:31:18 UTC 2009*
why don't you use the officially released stuff or the rpms?
I have followed this http://www.ruslansivak.com/index.cfm/Xen to install xen-dom0 but the system also halted at : /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Red Hat nash version 5.1.19.6 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 4 ,error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 5, error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 6,error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 7,error -110 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:04 AM, mica fang micafang@gmail.com wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, Mar 5 13:31:18 UTC 2009
why don't you use the officially released stuff or the rpms?
I have followed this http://www.ruslansivak.com/index.cfm/Xen%C2%A0to install xen-dom0
Those are not the officially released CentOS rpms. Hopefully, someone responds to your comment there.
Otherwise, if you do not need Xen 3.2, just "yum groupinstall Virtualization".
jerry
From: Jerry Amundson jamundso@gmail.com Date: 03/05/2009 01:27 PM
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:04 AM, mica fang micafang@gmail.com wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, Mar 5 13:31:18 UTC 2009
why don't you use the officially released stuff or the rpms?
I have followed this http://www.ruslansivak.com/index.cfm/Xen to install xen-dom0
Those are not the officially released CentOS rpms. Hopefully, someone responds to your comment there.
Otherwise, if you do not need Xen 3.2, just "yum groupinstall Virtualization".
jerry
There are also RPMs I've looked at but not yet tried hosted here: http://www.gitco.de/repo/ Has anyone else here given them a try?
Aaron
On 03/05/2009 10:14 PM, Aaron Linnen wrote:
From: Jerry Amundson jamundso@gmail.com Date: 03/05/2009 01:27 PM
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:04 AM, mica fang micafang@gmail.com wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, Mar 5 13:31:18 UTC 2009
why don't you use the officially released stuff or the rpms?
I have followed this http://www.ruslansivak.com/index.cfm/Xen to install xen-dom0
Those are not the officially released CentOS rpms. Hopefully, someone responds to your comment there.
Otherwise, if you do not need Xen 3.2, just "yum groupinstall Virtualization".
jerry
There are also RPMs I've looked at but not yet tried hosted here: http://www.gitco.de/repo/ Has anyone else here given them a try?
I did. My scenario was the following - host: C5.2/x86_64, fully updated. Needed to run Win XP/32 as VM, with full access to the parallel port given to a very special Windows driver (which controls a development board) - in the guest we have to run a commercial tool based on Eclipse (Java).
With stock xen, I was unable to transfer control of the parallel port to the guest. It simply did not see the port, no matter what I have tried With xen-3.3 from gitco and the same xen config, the port was correctly identified and could be used from Windows. On the other hand, Java started to consume 99% of the CPU making the VM impossible to use.
See also http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2009-February/000836.html
Aaron Linnen wrote on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:14:41 -0600:
http://www.gitco.de/repo Has anyone else here given them a try?
They work fine for me. Those are the ones I use if I need anything >= 3.3
Kai
Mica fang wrote on Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:04:42 +0800:
I have followed this http://www.ruslansivak.com/index.cfm/Xen to install
This is not an answer to my question why you don't use the official rpms either from CentOS or from xen.org. ;-)
Anyway, as you seem to be getting consistent errors I suggest you ask on the xen list. It seems to be something that is xen-specific, not CentOS- specific.
Kai
-
Aaron Linnen -
Jerry Amundson -
Kai Schaetzl -
Manuel Wolfshant -
mica fang