No, it isn't. I think we should go through * Round the call for any additional agenda items * Action Updates * Bug tracker * RPM subpackage structure Lars

On 20/05/2014 12:02, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:

If it's not too late to add agenda items now, could we talk about the structure of the RPM subpackages?

In particular, some folks here at Citrix have spent some time fixing up our xen RPM such that the subpackages have a more useful split - for example, there is a now distinction between xen-libs and xen-dom0-libs - where the former has libraries useful in all domains, e.g. libxenstore and libvchan, and the latter has libraries that are _only_ useful for dom0. There are a few other changes that have been made, and I was wondering what the appetite was for convergence, and where the problems will lie if we were to pursue this.

Thanks,

Jon

---

From: centos-virt-bounces@centos.org [centos-virt-bounces@centos.org] on behalf of Lars Kurth [lars.kurth@xen.org] Sent: 19 May 2014 07:35 To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS Subject: [CentOS-virt] Call for agenda items for tomorrow's VIRT SIG meeting

Hi all, please reply to this thread of you have any agenda items that you would like to add. Meeting minutes of past minutes are under

• http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization "Meetings"
• The TODO list is under

http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Status (just updated it)

• Draft roadmap is under "Roadmap" and probably needs formalizing

Lars

---

CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt