Hello, All!
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gena Makhomed" gmm@csdoc.com To: centos-virt@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 19:19:13 Subject: [CentOS-virt] qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1
Hello, All!
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
-- Best regards, Gena _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian:
If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
<domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ..... qemu:commandline <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain>
Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires, what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug, and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched manually with each new release.
Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014: this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff from https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages, for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64 in attach.
==============================================================
Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
P.S. After patching qemu-kvm - option acpitable works without any bugs:
# man qemu-kvm
-acpitable [sig=str][...] If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu, then the oem_id from the SLIC table will be copied into the RSDT table (this is a Debian addition).
----- Original Message -----
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a serious one.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gena Makhomed" gmm@csdoc.com To: centos-virt@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 23:09:14 Subject: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 7.1 + qemu-kvm-ev + SLIC acpitable windows bug workaround
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian:
If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
<domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ..... <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain>
Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires, what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug, and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched manually with each new release.
Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014: this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff from https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages, for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64 in attach.
==============================================================
Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
P.S. After patching qemu-kvm - option acpitable works without any bugs:
# man qemu-kvm
-acpitable [sig=str][...] If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu, then the oem_id from the SLIC table will be copied into the RSDT table (this is a Debian addition).
----- Original Message -----
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
-- Best regards, Gena
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a serious one.
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all - looks like this is yet another bug - in the bugzilla settings.
But I can't find how to report this bugzilla misconfiguration, so I just report this oVirt bugreport as bugreport for package qemu-kvm-rhev from Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Product.
I hope this help.
----- Original Message -----
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian:
If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
<domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ..... <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain>
Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires, what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug, and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched manually with each new release.
Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014: this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff from https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages, for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64 in attach.
==============================================================
Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
P.S. After patching qemu-kvm - option acpitable works without any bugs:
# man qemu-kvm
-acpitable [sig=str][...] If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu, then the oem_id from the SLIC table will be copied into the RSDT table (this is a Debian addition).
----- Original Message -----
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
Great, thanks. qemu-kvm-rhev is ok, qemu-kvm-ev is basically the same thing.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gena Makhomed" gmm@csdoc.com To: centos-virt@centos.org Sent: Thursday, 30 July, 2015 20:04:39 Subject: [CentOS-virt] qemu-kvm SLIC acpitable workaround of Windows bug
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a serious one.
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all - looks like this is yet another bug - in the bugzilla settings.
But I can't find how to report this bugzilla misconfiguration, so I just report this oVirt bugreport as bugreport for package qemu-kvm-rhev from Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Product.
I hope this help.
----- Original Message -----
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian:
If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
<domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ..... <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain>
Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires, what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug, and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched manually with each new release.
Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014: this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff from https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages, for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64 in attach.
==============================================================
Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
P.S. After patching qemu-kvm - option acpitable works without any bugs:
# man qemu-kvm
-acpitable [sig=str][...] If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu, then the oem_id from the SLIC table will be copied into the RSDT table (this is a Debian addition).
----- Original Message -----
Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
-- Best regards, Gena _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Gena Makhomed gmm@csdoc.com wrote:
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like
a serious one.
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all - looks like this is yet another bug - in the bugzilla settings.
Adding oVirt devel mailing list.
But I can't find how to report this bugzilla misconfiguration, so I just report this oVirt bugreport as bugreport for package qemu-kvm-rhev from Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Product.
I hope this help.
Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/ [2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/
----- Original Message -----
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can.
In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian:
If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and libvirt xml config:
<domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu=' http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ..... qemu:commandline <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline>
</domain>
Winodws not working correctly in this case, because Windows requires, what oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC must be also placed into oem_id and oem_table_id of RSDT.
Debian version of qemu-kvm contains workaround for this windows bug, and using Debian - Windows VM will works fine. But CentOS packages does not contain such workaround, so qemu-kvm-ev now must be patched manually with each new release.
Patch already was created by Michael Tokarev in 2014: this is file mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff from https://packages.debian.org/jessie/qemu-kvm
This patch cleanly applies also to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1
See mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff and qemu-kvm.spec.patch in attach for details.
After executing rpmbuild -ba qemu-kvm.spec you can place new qemu-kvm binaries into /srv/download/centos/7/privat/x86_64/Packages create local repo and use it for upgrading rpm packages, for example, see privat.repo and privat-createrepo-7-x86_64 in attach.
==============================================================
Better if this workaround of Windows bug will be included into RHEL/CentOS ovirt repo binaries, and this will allow to anybody easy migrate Windows from hardware nodes to VMs and easy run CentOS/RHEL at hardware nodes.
P.S. After patching qemu-kvm - option acpitable works without any bugs:
# man qemu-kvm
-acpitable [sig=str][...] If a SLIC table is supplied to qemu, then the oem_id from the SLIC table will be copied into the RSDT table (this is a Debian addition).
----- Original Message -----
Is it possible to use binary packages build from
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.... with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
-- Best regards, Gena _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/ [2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/
Patch mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff with workaround not included into qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.6.1.src.rpm
Bug not in qemu, bug in windows - windows reject SLIC table if oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC table and from RSDT table is different, and this windows bug prevent any virt-p2v migration of OEM windows from hardware node to VM inside CentOS/RHEL server, even with config
qemu:commandline <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/path/to/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline>
because during acpi tables rebuild qemu-kvm from qemu-kvm-ev create RSDT table with BOCHS oem_id and BXPCRSDT oem_table_id.
Le 31/07/2015 17:50, Gena Makhomed a écrit :
On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/ [2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/
Patch mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff with workaround not included into qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.6.1.src.rpm
Bug not in qemu, bug in windows - windows reject SLIC table if oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC table and from RSDT table is different, and this windows bug prevent any virt-p2v migration of OEM windows from hardware node to VM inside CentOS/RHEL server, even with config
qemu:commandline <qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/> <qemu:arg value='file=/path/to/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/> </qemu:commandline>
because during acpi tables rebuild qemu-kvm from qemu-kvm-ev create RSDT table with BOCHS oem_id and BXPCRSDT oem_table_id.
Hi
I've just rebuild a qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.centos.6.2.src.rpm with your patch applied : https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/build/109631/
Regards, Jean-Marc
Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Nux! nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gena Makhomed" gmm@csdoc.com To: centos-virt@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 19:19:13 Subject: [CentOS-virt] qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1
Hello, All!
Is it possible to use binary packages build from
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23....
with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups)
Is using qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1 have any disadvantages?
-- Best regards, Gena _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On 30.07.2015 15:25, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo
Packages from kvm-common-testing probably is not a good choice for using in production environment.
I found in internet package http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-release/source/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-e...
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23....
==================================================================
As I understand from wiki https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt oVirt is upstream for Red Hat's Enterprise Virtualization product.
For first look http://cbs.centos.org/repos/ is unofficial source even https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all know only about "Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager" and "oVirt", and it know nothing about kvm-common-testing CBS repo.
Searching in google "qemu-kvm-ev site:https://bugs.centos.org/" I found only one tiket: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8407 in CentOS bugs tracker.
I am not sure what I can use packages from http://cbs.centos.org/repos/ and report about bugs into bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Project.
For first look - if I want to report bugs into oVirt Project bugzilla - I also must use qemu-kvm-ev packages from oVirt Project repository.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Gena Makhomed gmm@csdoc.com wrote:
On 30.07.2015 15:25, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Note that qemu-kvm-ev
is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo
Packages from kvm-common-testing probably is not a good choice for using in production environment.
I found in internet package
http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-release/source/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-e...
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23....
==================================================================
As I understand from wiki https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt oVirt is upstream for Red Hat's Enterprise Virtualization product.
For first look http://cbs.centos.org/repos/ is unofficial source even https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all know only about "Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager" and "oVirt", and it know nothing about kvm-common-testing CBS repo.
Searching in google "qemu-kvm-ev site:https://bugs.centos.org/" I found only one tiket: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8407 in CentOS bugs tracker.
I am not sure what I can use packages from http://cbs.centos.org/repos/ and report about bugs into bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Project.
For first look - if I want to report bugs into oVirt Project bugzilla
- I also must use qemu-kvm-ev packages from oVirt Project repository.
So I suggest you to wait next week when oVirt 3.5.4 will go GA including an updated qemu-kvm-ev.
-- Best regards, Gena _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt