Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:12:20 -0400:
I think you are mixing the versions up or made a typo,
yes, I meant to write "Xen < 3.2".
My configs still have xenbr0 listed, but the scripts will take any xenbr* and convert it to eth* if it exists and is a bridge. I don't have any problem with DHCP. I also have iptables currently disabled.
Before going to the new Xen I tried to use this explanation for building a bridge for xend, but it doesn't work for me at all :-( http://henning.schmiedehausen.org/wingnut-diaries/archives/86 Unfortunately, bridge interfaces are missing from the Red Hat Deployment Guide, I'm still looking for a guide about what can be used in bridge ifcfg files. What I see on the net looks completely different.
Oh, and you were absolutely right about the routing. I changed the default gateway to fit the public subnet and added a static route for the private subnet and now the additional src in ip route list is gone. Didn't change that the DHCPOFFER doesn't get back to the VM, though :-(
Kai,
Why not try tcpdump on the bridge interface and see if you can see the DHCPOFFER/DHCPACK and what MACs it used.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.