December 2008 - devel - lists.centos.org

anaconda dependency calculation?
by Nicholas Byrne 04 Aug '25

04 Aug '25

Hi all, I'm trying to find a tool that calculates all dependencies for a specific package or group of packages for use with CentOS 5 (beta) with the intention of putting together a custom single CD build of CentOS 5. With CentOS 4 i used a python script that used the hdrlist module to find all dependencies which borrowed code from a number of sources. I've looked at yumdownloader and how it checks dependencies (using the --resolve option) but if i pass it the list of packages defined in say the Base and the Core yum groups which generally form an absolute minimal install i end up with about 200 packages. If i do a custom install (using beta 1 disks) and deselect everything i end up with over 300 packages. So i'm guessing anaconda calculates dependencies in a slightly different way, can anyone point me to files/code where i should be looking to find out? Thanks very much in advance for help Nick This e-mail is the property of Quadriga Worldwide Ltd, intended for the addressee only and confidential. Any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from Quadriga may be monitored. Quadriga cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Quadriga.

6 11

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

Red Hat IPA
by Joe Royall 27 May '09

27 May '09

Red Hat recentely released thier IPA server as open source. Is Centos considering a rebuild? -- Joe Royall

7 16

CentOS Directory Server (CDS) and more is available for testing
by Jason Cox 02 Mar '09

02 Mar '09

Tim Verhoeven wrote: > I'm happy to announce the availability of the CentOS Directory Server > (CDS) for testing. The exact details on how to install it can be found > on this wiki page : Any updates on when we will see this ready for production use? I would like to get away from our current way of providing server authentication and implement CDS. I pretty much have the tools written to use CDS now, but I can not move forward untill it is out of a "testing" status in my environment. --- Jason Cox

14 41

Help offer on Sparc front
by Hugo van der Kooij 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have just received a SunBlade150 which I would like to put to good use. I understand there is a Centos port underway for the Sparc line. If it is possible to trash the harddisk and fill it with the bare stuff to make it work I am willing to lend access to the system for developers and also do some things myself. I am not a programmer but I can spot the incidental error and maybe fix a typo or at least do my best to provide serious feedback in attempts to capture, reproduce and solve issues. If there is a basic kit somewhere to turn the former Solaris machine and set it on the road to Centos 5 I am willing to add my weight and push the cart along. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij(a)vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHHl8BBvzDRVjxmYERAtwIAKCajwRD8ZIbbQsVRiA89+9OYD30KQCfR6gw uIbicj9rZqC/HdYv0fXosB0= =Iaaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 5

CentOS-6 Artwork - Round 1
by Alain Reguera Delgado 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Does anyone knows what is the plan for CentOS-6 artwork ? Actually, some propositions are available at: https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/ What do you think of the above proposition ? Is something missing ? Best regards, - -- Alain Reguera Delgado <al(a)ciget.cienfuegos.cu> GnuPG : http://ciget.cienfuegos.cu/~al/publickey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJTF3xyXxCQEoXDZARAgMxAJ0fG5BHp54nOadb+Qq+SP0WTapBiQCfboGy ddd17sMXXIgNVnSRCVYORFI= =wqTc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 6

presto / deltarpm
by Karanbir Singh 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

hi, The idea of yum-presto and deltarpm support on mirror.centos.org is something that seems to be worth visiting again. I am just wondering if there is anyone who would like to grab the issue, do the testing, workout whats involved and then try and come up with an implementation plan ? Would be good if you already knew how yum and repomd type repositories worked. Anyone interested and have the time ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

4 4

/dev/pts/??
by Michel Donais 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

In Centos or RHEL terminal devices are created as /dev/pts/1 .../2 .../3 etc. On Some others Unix they are defines as dev/tty01 ..../tty02 .../tty03 How do I can get theses terminals identites in Centos when I open a Terminal of any kind? --- Michel Donais

4 7

Surplus SUN Ultra-10 hardware
by Hugo van der Kooij 30 Dec '08

30 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, It seems we have two surplus SUN Ultra-10 machines available. So if there are developers who are willing to pick up q machine at my home (Maasland, NL) let me know and I will inform you as soon as I have the hardware available. If you have no use for them but happen to know some Open source project that might benefit from them feel free to contact me. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij(a)vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. Nid wyf yn y swyddfa ar hyn o bryd. Anfonwch unrhyw waith i'w gyfieithu. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklajasACgkQBvzDRVjxmYE+XQCfcSXePDESISvHtMrFU5y95PMp xZIAn1GZ/D1O6bs5aIDkhRsi3RHd8KLs =At8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

kmod packaging guideline
by Farkas Levente 26 Dec '08

26 Dec '08

hi, it'd be nice to write some kind of docs about how to write kmod packages for centos. as i wrote in one of my earlier post there are two problems currently with the weak-updates kmods: kmodtool shouldn't have to add to all packages rather use the /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config ie: ---------------------------------------------- @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ -Source10: kmodtool Source11: find-requires Source12: find-requires.ksyms -%define kmodtool bash %{SOURCE10} +%define kmodtool bash /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/kmodtool ---------------------------------------------- and add: BuildRequires: redhat-rpm-config the other problem is the these new kmod gives warning during install. ie if someone create a kickstart file which contains these kmods then anaconda warning about it: "Bad kmod package 'kmod-....' does not require a kernel" the reason for this is /usr/lib/anaconda/fedorakmod.py which has a check in resolveVersions. so hack the current find-requires.ksym to also requires at least kernel-%{arch} would be useful. at the same time write a newer short howto write kmods for centos-5. just my 2c. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

4 11

Artwork Feature
by Ned Slider 25 Dec '08

25 Dec '08

I received the following PM (below) on the CentOS forums the other day. I don't know if Bill has made contact with anyone in the ArtWork team regarding this yet, so just passing it along (apologies for the delay - I didn't get a notification of the PM). CC. Alain (Artwork SIG) Dag (Promo SIG) Bill (linuxgraphicsusers.com) ---------------- Sent: 2008/12/20 21:54:58 Art team feature Hi Phil, My name is Bill DeJohn (Dadster). I am co-founder of Linux Graphics Users forum. Each month we feature a distro's art team (see here http://linuxgraphicsusers.com/index.php?board=48.0) and I'd like to feature the CentOS art team in an up-coming month. Could you please pass this pm on to whoever I need to contact to set up an article featuring CentOS. Thanks, Bill

2 1

Rebuild xorg
by Alain PORTAL 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Hi, I just installed and fully updated Centos 5.2 on my laptop. Unfortunately, this one need at least the version 6.8.0 of the xorg-x11-drv-ati (available in Fedora 9), and this driver need xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.4.99.1 :-( So, I need to rebuild many things if I want to use centos on my laptop, and I want to use it! As this is the first time I use Centos, could you tell me which tools I need and how I have to do to rebuild packages that I'll probably take on Fedora 9 mirrors? Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/

9 35

new drivers for 5.3
by Michael Simpson 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Hi there I note that the new kernels for 5.3 will have the bcm43xx work from 2.6.25 backported into them. Does this mean that the driver name will change to b43 (as i thought that bcm43xx was deprecated)? If not then will we need to change the firmware by cutting from 4.150.10.5 and will bcm43xx-fwcutter work for this? thanks mike

4 4

Bug report policy
by Alain PORTAL 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Hi, I should want to know if I find a bug that I know it probably couldn't be fixed by the Centos team, I can (I have to) report it on RH bugzilla? Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/

3 4

Extras Packages Proposal
by Jean-Marc LIGER 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

3 6

Defining what CentOS is
by Dag Wieers 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Hi, We discussed this on #centos after yet another "centos" user had problem using yum. What is missing is a page targetted at integrators/distributors with a list of requirements for using the "CentOS" product name or even saying it is derived, based or build on CentOS. We might be able to kill more than one bird with a single stone, so I am looking for more things we want to prevent distributors/integrators doing without making it impossible for them to use CentOS altogether. My first concern was the support problem, what do we (at minimum) expect to have when users say they have a CentOS. A working yum using the CentOS official repositories, a minimal set of official packages (which ?). Without complying to the list of requirements, they may not refer to CentOS (and people will not have the wrong expectations for support). http://wiki.centos.org/About/CentOS-product-definition Feedback please ? -- -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

8 15

updated yum packages are now available in c5-testing
by Karanbir Singh 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

The following packages have been updated in the testing repo : ./5/testing/SRPMS/yum-utils-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.src.rpm ./5/testing/SRPMS/yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.src.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-tmprepo-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-keys-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-upgrade-helper-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-changelog-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-protectbase-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-merge-conf-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-tsflags-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-list-data-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-verify-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-kmod-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-protect-packages-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-versionlock-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-utils-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-NetworkManager-dispatcher-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-kernel-module-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-updateonboot-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-refresh-updatesd-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-downloadonly-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-security-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-allowdowngrade-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-aliases-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-priorities-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/yum-filter-data-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-tmprepo-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-keys-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-upgrade-helper-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-changelog-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-protectbase-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-merge-conf-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-tsflags-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-list-data-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-verify-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-kmod-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-protect-packages-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-versionlock-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-utils-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-NetworkManager-dispatcher-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-kernel-module-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-updateonboot-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-refresh-updatesd-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-downloadonly-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-security-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-allowdowngrade-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-aliases-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-priorities-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm ./5/testing/i386/RPMS/yum-filter-data-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm test these on non-production machines only for now. And all feedback is appreciated. keepcache is now turned on, how does this impact everyone's yum setups ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

8 16

Apache modules C4,5 repos
by David Hrbáč 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

2 10

Trac Site: certificate expired ?
by Alain Reguera Delgado 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This morning tried to access https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/ through firefox and the following response came to me: - --- Secure Connection Failed projects.centos.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on 12/10/2008 08:21 PM. (Error code: sec_error_expired_certificate) * This could be a problem with the server's configuration, or it could be someone trying to impersonate the server. * If you have connected to this server successfully in the past, the error may be temporary, and you can try again later. - --- Cheers, - -- Alain Reguera Delgado <al(a)ciget.cienfuegos.cu> GnuPG : http://ciget.cienfuegos.cu/~al/publickey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJQnYnyXxCQEoXDZARArVVAKCxxThnx731mmSA7ady4sgTJ3AqOQCcD5o7 tt0v4gMsfNqbHqKUaKOfOcQ= =UPgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 11

using GIT as VCS for packaging rpms
by Karanbir Singh 19 Dec '08

19 Dec '08

While there are quite a few people using central VCS's like svn and cvs for hosting packaging repo's and building from them using automated tools - is anyone away of a decentralised setup using either Hg or Git ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

2 7

Re: Updated xfs-kmod?
by James Pearson 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Eric Sandeen wrote: > James Pearson wrote: >> I notice that there is a more recent 'test' xfs-kmod for CentOS5/RHEL5 at: >> >> <http://sandeen.net/rhel5_xfs/xfs-kmod-0.5-2.2.6.18_88.el5.testing.src.rpm> >> >> It looks like this is based on XFS code from the 2.6.25 kernel >> >> The SRPM has been there for 6 months, so I was wondering how much >> testing has been done with the code and CentOS5/RHEL5 ? >> >> Thanks >> >> James Pearson > > You probably don't actually want to use that kmod... it is a very rough > backport, and it's not complete and has a few errors, I believe. I > should probably take it down. > > If you sit tight for a while, (less than the 6 months or so mentioned > above I hope), I may be able to point to a better tested, updated kmod. Thanks James

1 1

PHP 5.2.6 + Roundcube
by checker＠lleddew.me.uk 11 Dec '08

11 Dec '08

I'm not sure whether you are still interested in feedback on php in the testing repo but here goes anyway. I have used the testing repo to upgrade php for use with RoundCube which requires php5.2 or greater and it runs without problem. However during configuration, the programme complained that it couldn't find php-mcrypt (not surprising as it's not in the testing repo). On checking the logs, I see : PHP Warning: PHP Startup: mcrypt: Unable to initialize module Module compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0,thread-safety=0 PHP compiled with module API=20060613, debug=0,thread-safety=0 These options need to match No doubt this is because I had the mcrypt module for php5.1.6 installed. In which case, can I make a request for an updated module? Not high on your priorities I guess. KeithW

1 0

CVE-2008-1488
by David Hrbáč 10 Dec '08

10 Dec '08

Hi, I have prepared a new version of php-pecl-apc.spec, see http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1488. Please find attached file. Builds fine on C4 even C5. Please provide this package within Centosplus 5 too. Thanks, David %define php_extdir %(php-config --extension-dir 2>/dev/null || echo %{_libdir}/php4) %define php_apiver %((echo %{default_apiver}; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP API => //p') | tail -1) Summary: APC caches and optimizes PHP intermediate code Name: php-pecl-apc Version: 3.0.19 Release: 1%{?dist} License: PHP License Group: Development/Languages URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/APC Source: http://pecl.php.net/get/APC-%{version}.tgz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Requires: php-api = %{php_apiver} Conflicts: php-mmcache php-eaccelerator BuildRequires: php-devel httpd-devel Provides: php-apc = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: php-apc Provides: php-pecl(apc) %description APC is a free, open, and robust framework for caching and optimizing PHP intermediate code. %prep %setup -q -n APC-%{version} %build %{_bindir}/phpize %configure --enable-apc-mmap --with-apxs=%{_sbindir}/apxs --with-php-config=%{_bindir}/php-config %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__make} install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} # Drop in the bit of configuration %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/php.d %{__cat} > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/php.d/apc.ini << 'EOF' ; Enable apc extension module extension = apc.so ; Options for the apc module apc.enabled=1 apc.shm_segments=1 apc.optimization=0 apc.shm_size=32 apc.ttl=7200 apc.user_ttl=7200 apc.num_files_hint=1024 apc.mmap_file_mask=/tmp/apc.XXXXXX apc.enable_cli=1 apc.cache_by_default=1 EOF %clean %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %files %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) %doc TECHNOTES.txt CHANGELOG LICENSE NOTICE TODO INSTALL apc.php %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/php.d/apc.ini %{php_extdir}/apc.so %changelog * Wed Dec 10 2008 David Hrbáč <david(a)hrbac.cz> - 3.0.19-1 - new upstream version * Fri Sep 15 2006 Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.12-5 - Updated to new upstream version * Mon Sep 11 2006 Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.10-5 - FC6 rebuild * Sun Aug 13 2006 Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.10-4 - FC6T2 rebuild * Mon Jun 19 2006 - Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.10-3 - Renamed to php-pecl-apc and added provides php-apc - Removed php version string from the package version * Mon Jun 19 2006 - Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.10-2 - Trimmed down BuildRequires - Added Provices php-pecl(apc) * Sun Jun 18 2006 - Chris Chabot <chabotc(a)xs4all.nl> - 3.0.10-1 - Initial package, templated on already existing php-json and php-eaccelerator packages

1 0

phpBB LDAP bind
by Marcus Moeller 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Good Evening, with a little help from Ralph I have now successfully setup LDAP bind on the phpBB TestVM. The plugin seems to be read-only, so we need to find another way to register user accounts (maybe from CMS). Next step would be a test database import from newbb to make sure that existing posts can me migrated. Chee already provided a script for converting newbb to phpBB2 so maybe I have to migrate to phpBB2 database format first and then upgrade to phpBB3 (unless a SQL guru want's to spend some time on it). Best Regards Marcus

1 0

PRI hardware
by Hugo van der Kooij 07 Dec '08

07 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We recently discussed the bit about POTS/ISDN access to VOIP. I have acquired (salvaged) some SHIVA ISDN-30 LRAS devices which contain a PCI ISDN-30 card. A quick look around did not show this as supported hardware under Linux. But as Shiva was sold to Intel and Intel abolished the whole line some years ago I think that reverse engineering here is the only way. Anyone wiling to sync his/her teeth into this one? I have the firmware for the units including the caode that needs to be send to this card. The card is powered by a 68060 CPU. I will see if I can get some more details though historic contacts if anyone is willing to help out. My programming skills are rusty at best. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij(a)vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. Nid wyf yn y swyddfa ar hyn o bryd. Anfonwch unrhyw waith i'w gyfieithu. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJO7PPBvzDRVjxmYERAsCvAJ4wq/e2Gfr3+9sVKBNagFUTaZyEJwCfVD1D LbACDRuyu4LGcfIX97gdn2Q= =4Dfi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel December 2008