devel May 2008

devel@lists.centos.org

45 participants
33 discussions

Help offer on Sparc front
by Hugo van der Kooij 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have just received a SunBlade150 which I would like to put to good use. I understand there is a Centos port underway for the Sparc line. If it is possible to trash the harddisk and fill it with the bare stuff to make it work I am willing to lend access to the system for developers and also do some things myself. I am not a programmer but I can spot the incidental error and maybe fix a typo or at least do my best to provide serious feedback in attempts to capture, reproduce and solve issues. If there is a basic kit somewhere to turn the former Solaris machine and set it on the road to Centos 5 I am willing to add my weight and push the cart along. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij(a)vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHHl8BBvzDRVjxmYERAtwIAKCajwRD8ZIbbQsVRiA89+9OYD30KQCfR6gw uIbicj9rZqC/HdYv0fXosB0= =Iaaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 5

presto / deltarpm
by Karanbir Singh 05 Jan '09

05 Jan '09

hi, The idea of yum-presto and deltarpm support on mirror.centos.org is something that seems to be worth visiting again. I am just wondering if there is anyone who would like to grab the issue, do the testing, workout whats involved and then try and come up with an implementation plan ? Would be good if you already knew how yum and repomd type repositories worked. Anyone interested and have the time ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

4 4

Extras Packages Proposal
by Jean-Marc LIGER 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

3 6

CentOS Forums again
by Tim Verhoeven 13 Aug '08

13 Aug '08

Hello everyone, Having some time to do stuff for CentOS here at LinuxTag I've also being building FreeIPA packages for CentOS. The idea that this will be core part of a central authentication system. Meaning that you will only need 1 account that you can use to login into the website, forum, wiki, bugtracker, systems, ... IMHO the most important system that needs to be attached to the central auth database are the forums. There are a lot of users there (and a lot of content). So I was thinking, why not fix 2 things at the same time. Migrate from the old forum to the new forum that is linked to the central auth system. And then later on couple the other existing apps to it. My feeling is that the most productive way to get forward with the website/forum update is to split the forum from the website. In my experience the forum present in CMS tools aren't made for the amount of traffic we are having. So something dedicated sound like a better option. So I have been looking around for open source forum software that link to ldap without to much effort. I've looked at 3 projects (Phorum, phpBB and SMF). They all 3 are good looking, well featured and maintained. Though, only phpBB has a decent built-in LDAP integration (FreeIPA is built on top of LDAP). So my proposal is to setup a FreeIPA instance, link it with phpBB and try to migrate a part of the current forums and see how all that works. And if it looks good migrate to that. So what do people think, did I miss stuff, other suggestions, ... Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be(a)gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the "microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds)

10 24

CentOS Directory Server (CDS) and more is available for testing
by Tim Verhoeven 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

Hello, I'm happy to announce the availability of the CentOS Directory Server (CDS) for testing. The exact details on how to install it can be found on this wiki page : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DirectoryServerSetup Besides functional testing of CDS it would also be great if you could watch out for errors in the rebranding (meaning the use of upstream's name and/or logo). Any issues you encounter are to be reported here, but you can also come to the #centos-qa IRC on freenode for support. Also the documentation for CDS can be found on our website at http://www.centos.org/docs/5/. Besides CDS there are other things in the testing repo on dev.centos.org that could use some testing. These include the openjdk 1.6 java version, the vm kernels (tuned for use inside VMWare etc) and a newer version of mysql. We are also looking for feedback on those things so we can move stuff to CentOS Extras or CentOS Plus. Happy testing, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be(a)gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the "microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds)

4 4

Point yum repos to centos gpg key in /etc/pki/
by Jeff Sheltren 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

Hi, as a follow up to a conversation in #centos-devel, I'd like to get input from the list on this issue. The question is where to point people, and tools like yum, for the centos gpg key used to verify rpm signatures. My opinion is that pointing to the key in /etc/pki/ which gets installed by the centos- release makes the most sense. This is already installed locally on any centos (-5) machine. See ie. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2419 From a security standpoint, there are issues with either choice. However, if your install media has been compromised, then there would be many other ways to bypass the gpg checks rather than just changing the gpg key from the centos-release package. Pointing to a URL for the gpg key opens up more security issues such as dns poisoning. -Jeff

6 11

New QA / Testing potential
by Karanbir Singh 03 Jun '08

03 Jun '08

Since there are quite a few people offering to help test apps /packages in CentOS - I am wondering if now is a good time to organise the CentOS-Testing repository and process a bit more. There are a *lot* of things that need looking at and pushing into the production repo's however a lack of testing feedback means they dont. Does anyone want to take this up ? I can hammer together some ideas into a wiki page, but dont have the time to really follow the process up or to organise it on a ongoing basis. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

5 8

5.2 Dates
by Karanbir Singh 01 Jun '08

01 Jun '08

ok, so I put some dates up at http://wiki.centos.org/KaranbirSingh/5.2 Essentially, 25th is the last date that I am still looking at backlog and mod's etc. After that its basically just all builders go, get the packages into the -qa target. Once that is done - install media. this plan gives the -qa guys 6 days to look at stuff. Which should be enough ? - KB

7 8

GFS Update for CentOS 3 kernel 2.4.21-57.EL
by Tru Huynh 30 May '08

30 May '08

Thanks to John Newbigin the new GFS packages for the 2.4.21-57.EL kernel are now available. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0259.html i386: csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-hugemem-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-smp-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm Best regards, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

GFS Update for CentOS 3 kernel 2.4.21-57.EL
by John Newbigin 30 May '08

30 May '08

(I am sending this message again with the correct subject). New GFS packages for the 2.4.21-57.EL kernel are ready. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0259.html http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i386/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i386/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i386.… http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i386/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i38… http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i686/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i686/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i686.… http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i686/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i68… http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i686/GFS-modules-hugemem-6.0.2.… http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/csgfs/i686/GFS-modules-smp-6.0.2.36-8… These packages are signed with my jnewbigin-csgfs(a)ict.swin.edu.au key. They need to be resigned with the CentOS-3 key and published to the csgfs repo. If you could let me know once you have download the packages it would be good. These are hosted by a virtual machine which may not always be turned on. I'll make sure it stays on until you have got a copy. Thanks John. -- John Newbigin ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin -- John Newbigin ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel May 2008