devel November 2015

devel@lists.centos.org

42 participants
28 discussions

CentOS 7 ppc64le (power little endian) rpms, build logs, mock configs
by James O'Connor 21 Dec '15

21 Dec '15

Here are the first two rounds of CentOS 7 ppc64le rpms, build logs, and mock configs: Round A: http://ppcbootstrap.lon1.centos.org/C7a/ppc64le/ * Built atop Fedora 21 ppc64le VMs * Built from http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/os/Source/SPackages/ and c7-ppc64le branch on git.centos.org * Source rpms were temporarily modified to remove circular dependencies during the bootstrap process Round B: http://ppcbootstrap.lon1.centos.org/C7b/ppc64le/ * Built atop Centos 7 ppc64le VMs * Built from http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/os/Source/SPackages/ , http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/updates/Source/SPackages/ , and c7-ppc64le branch on git.centos.org * noarch rpms were skipped as those will be taken from c7-x86_64 * Only gcc.spec (%global build_ada 0), curl.spec (upstream testcase fix), ghostscript.spec (upstream segfault fix) and nss.spec (upstream fix for expired PayPal cert) were modified. I will provide further details on these alterations on the altarch ppc64le wiki page once that gets created. Feedback is most welcome. You may find jpoc on the #centos-devel and #centos-ppc irc channels. Once the AltArch SIG is officially approved, we will share installable alpha/beta images and rpm repositories. Thanks -James

6 8

CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2015-11-25)
by Honza Horak 08 Dec '15

08 Dec '15

SCLo SIG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 0:00+1d Tokyo, 1:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. = Topics = * devtoolset-4 rebuilding issues * rh-nginx18 and rh-varnish4 SCL settings * dist-git repos creation -- updates? * review new-SIG-member process (make approval part more concrete) Honza

3 4

scheduled infra outage : cbs.centos.org (Koji build farm)
by Fabian Arrotin 03 Dec '15

03 Dec '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just to let you know that we have scheduled a maintenance window that will impact the following service[s] : - - cbs.centos.org Migration is scheduled for """"Thursday December 3rd, 9:00 am UTC time"""". You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2015-12-3 9:00 UTC') The expected "downtime" is estimated to ~2h. During that time, the koji nodes (koji hub,web, builders) will be unavailable. We'll send a mail when the whole koji setup will be available again. Thanks for your comprehending and patience. on behalf of the Infra team, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZcXhAACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4JfgCcDgOPpmdNwL5jbItj4SIUwxCA pYUAn0EW0Ocddh3PQddazae7HBSc5Eq8 =AVY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 2

missing debuginfo packages
by Farkas Levente 01 Dec '15

01 Dec '15

hi, there are many packages missing from http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/x86_64/ eg: libgcc libffi libstdc++ is there any other place where can i find them? regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

3 4

CentOS 7 liveCD survey
by Fabian Arrotin 28 Nov '15

28 Nov '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, While working on the next 7.1511 Live media, I discovered that the size for the actual CentOS 7 LiveCD would be more than 700MB. It's due to some packages being now bigger and bigger, also due to the big Gnome 3.8 -> 3.14 rebase. One obvious package I can remove from the packages manifest (which itself is consuming more and more space) is Firefox. If I remove it from the packages manifest (only for LiveCD, it will obviously stay for the LiveGnome and LiveKDE DVD iso images), it's then back to 650 MB, so that would mean that one would still be able to burn it on a CD. But the real question is then : does that even make sense ? for each release, we're now fighting with disk space constraints, and I'm each time removing packages from that LiveCD image. If we remove Firefox itself, that would mean that such LiveCD would be useful just for people willing to "test" CentOS on their hardware, but that would be a basic Gnome desktop. It builds/runs fine, can be installed too (like before), but I'd like your opinion about this. Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZVyOMACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4w4ACdEZZJbJwEXaq1BrsorEW9YZSR EcYAn3BwnoHgwRV97f0yAKaGspvaux+u =OXeJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

11 14

Missing SCL (broken dep)
by Remi Collet 28 Nov '15

28 Nov '15

Howdy, Looking at http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/ rh-php56 requires httpd24 which is not yet there Regards, Remi.

2 1

announcing content from the sign process
by Karanbir Singh 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

hi SIGs are releasing stuff, the Cloud SIG has had a few updates since their initial release, but this content isnt being announced as yet. To work towards this, I am going to plumb in an auto email script that should send out one notice per SIG per day, for days when that SIG has released content. Since the sign, push only runs once a day, it wont be a huge number of emails. As a test bed, I am going to set this up to send these announcements to the CentOS-Devel list ( this list! ), and if everyone feels the format etc is fine, we can then start sending them to the CentOS-Announce list. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

3 6

CSIG-2015:0002 Info CentOS 6 VirtulizationSIG Update
by Karanbir Singh 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

CentOS Virtualization SIG Errata and Security Advisory CSIG-2015:0002 Info There is an update notification for content released by the CentOS Virtualisation SIG. The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: CentOS Linux 6 /virt/x86_64/xen/ -------- a6dbfb7ffcabf469dec88e0b844f24bd98ab9aef4ae7357d747ac51a5c711bc0 libvirt-python-1.2.15-1.el6.x86_64.rpm Sources: /virt/Source/xen/ -------- 69db6203a08bd35a9032126e9f841b3a031ea42c4342669c973c6e0c9d8b7698 libvirt-python-1.2.15-1.el6.src.rpm * Tue Jan 06 2015 Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> - 0.600.0-25 - roll in tap2 support for xen * Fri May 30 2014 Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan(a)redhat.com> - 0.600.0-24 - Mark RHEL7 as supported (rhbz#1102345) * Thu May 29 2014 Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan(a)redhat.com> - 0.600.0-23 - virtinst: by default add USB2 controllers (rhbz#1001999) - pvpanic device support (rhbz#1101536) Debuginfo: /virt/x86_64 -------- aa760a3b9589119da815d89fbce43f44898464641b04349dcd7fe62a0e6ec271 libvirt-python-debuginfo-1.2.15-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

3 4

Re: [CentOS-devel] [Gluster-users] What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG?
by Niels de Vos 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:19:34AM -0800, Prasun Gera wrote: > It would be nice to have RHGS's equivalent in CentOS, keeping with the > general theme of CentOS. Any reason why that hasn't been considered ? I do not know if this has been considered before I joined the Storage Special Interest Group. The SIGs that are part of the CentOS Community are free to provide newer packages from upstream projects, or even projects that are not part of RHEL or its add-ons. A more complete desctiption of what a SIG can provide/do is available on the CentOS wiki at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup . The RHGS product tracks the upstream Gluster packages pretty close. I do not think there is a need to provide a rebuild of the RHGS packages. That said, if there is anyone interested in providing those, speak up and join the Storage SIG! https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage Thanks, Niels > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:25 AM, C.L. Martinez <carlopmart(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/10/2015 09:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > >> Hi Gluster users running on CentOS! > >> > >> As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable Gluster > >> releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage SIG [0]. We > >> would like to know what version of Gluster and which versions of CentOS > >> are most wanted by our users. > >> > >> The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the time. > >> This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster Community. > >> Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and will not receive > >> any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released early 2016 [1]. > >> > >> We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but CentOS-5 can > >> only get recent versions of the Gluster client. > >> > >> Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in the > >> CentOS Storage SIG: > >> > >> - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included > >> - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included > >> > >> - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? > >> - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? > >> > >> - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? > >> - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? > >> > >> - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody? > >> - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.6: nobody? > >> - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody? > >> > >> > >> Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few > >> months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is > >> x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me > >> or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster. > >> > >> Many thanks, > >> Niels > >> > >> > >> 0. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > >> 1. https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/ > >> > >> > > Hi all, > > > > My production environments runs Gluster 3.7 for CentOS-7/6. I am not > > planning to use CentOS-5. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users(a)gluster.org > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users(a)gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

1 0

What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG?
by Niels de Vos 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

Hi Gluster users running on CentOS! As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable Gluster releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage SIG [0]. We would like to know what version of Gluster and which versions of CentOS are most wanted by our users. The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the time. This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster Community. Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and will not receive any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released early 2016 [1]. We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but CentOS-5 can only get recent versions of the Gluster client. Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG: - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody? - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.6: nobody? - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody? Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster. Many thanks, Niels 0. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage 1. https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/

5 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel November 2015