devel November 2009

devel@lists.centos.org

19 participants
10 discussions

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

yum-3.2.8 for Centos 4 backport, part II.
by David Hrbáč 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

Hi, I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time. The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite a long time. Packages are in testing repos: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/ I'd like to ask for QA tests. This patched version passes all the internal yum tests (aka 'make test'). Regards, David Hrbáč

8 43

Lang subsites/ portals
by Karanbir Singh 25 Nov '09

25 Nov '09

hi guys, I was wondering if we can have a 45 min to 60 min chat on voice regarding the language subsites that have been worked on / planned and also been setup to some extent. There is content on the wiki that sort of sum's up most of the effort that has gone in - but I think it would be good for all of us if the following people were to sync up once: - Infrastructure - Artwork - French People - Spanish People - German People - Portuguese ( Brazil ) People We dont actually have a web team at the moment, but the Infra team should be a good representative of that side of things. And anyone else who wants to come along ( specially if more Language groups than mentioned above want to get involved at this stage ). CentOS has a voip setup in place, that also has some dial in numbers for the US, UK and Germany - and of-course other people can join over voip from anywhere in the world. We will try and get some instructions on howto achieve this online well in advance. I am going to propose having this conversation on the 18th Nov at 1945 UTC. -- Karanbir Singh London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

6 17

LiveCD rebuild with persistence enabled
by Ernesto Celis 25 Nov '09

25 Nov '09

Hello I don't know if this is the right list to post this, if it's not plese feel free to ponting me in the right direction. I was needing a LiveCD persistence capable to dum it into an external HDD and be able to work outside office with the customers. So I rebuilt the i386 CentOS LiveCD to make it persistence capable. I also made a little modification to the livecd-iso-to-disk script, so it creates the persistence file on an ext3 filesystem, since I have had bad experiences running linux live distros over FAT. If this is of your interest, let me know. Saludos Ernesto Celis (Usuario Linux #323140) irc.freenode.net #centos-es

4 5

Re: [CentOS-devel] mock-0.9.19 on CentOS5/RHEL5
by Florian La Roche 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:09:14PM -0500, Mike McLean wrote: > Perhaps since RHEL5 is something of an important platform for mock we > should consider making this codepath conditional, or otherwise fix this > without forking. Hello Mike, thanks for getting the new release of mock out, also for the pykickstart commit to keep working with older python releases. I've moved to newest rpms and besides mock I've also tested koji a bit more now. Some recompile tests with kernel,glibc,memtest86+ and a dozen other rpms did all work ok, so the special koji config steps should be complete now... (Also Michal Hlavinka has merged in some bits for dovecot to have newest Fedora Rawhide rpms compile on RHEL5, so overall it's been a good week to reduce extra patches for me.) thanks, Florian La Roche

2 3

deltarpm and presto for centos
by Farkas Levente 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

hi what's the current status of deltarpms and presto for centos? i'm just rebuild deltarpms, presto-utils, yum-presto packages from fedora for centos. is there any plan to add them to centos extras? what's the current state? i'm interested about not just using but generating deltarpms enabled repositories. imho it can save a lot's of bandwith for everybody (not to mention if presto will use google's courgette algorithm too). thanks in advance. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

6 14

suspend event channel support for xen domU
by Tait Clarridge 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Hey Guys, Is there any plan to merge suspend event channel support into the CentOS kernel-xen package? Just doing some work with remus and it is required for PV domU support. I can build my own kernels for now, but was wondering if there is a roadmap for this or whether it is something that needs to be worked on (I can help with testing if required). Best, Tait Clarridge

3 5

Re: [CentOS-devel] mock-0.9.19 on CentOS5/RHEL5
by Florian La Roche 15 Nov '09

15 Nov '09

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:09:14PM -0500, Mike McLean wrote: > On 11/12/2009 01:40 AM, Florian La Roche wrote: > >if you want to run the newest version of mock (0.9.19) > >with RHEL5/CentOS5, you can use a backported version from: > > > >http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/el-updates/5/SRPMS/mock-0.9.19-1.el5.src.rpm > >http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/el-updates/5/i386/mock-0.9.19-1.el5.noarch.rpm > > So basically just reverting the dbus patch (2046136e)? > > Perhaps since RHEL5 is something of an important platform for mock we > should consider making this codepath conditional, or otherwise fix this > without forking. Hello Mike, this small change is all that is needed, at least for a first start. I've put this into bugzilla in August and Clark has done a clean patch within two days, but it is not commited into the public repo and also no new rpm has been pushed out. See bz 516355 for details. Karanbir: You've already emailed the current CentOS position to have one mock version across all of CentOS3/4/5 running and that the newest bits don't qualify for that. This could maybe change next year once CentOS3 does not get updates anymore. I could see similar decisions like e.g. keeping to a mock version starting at initial release of a new major CentOS push-out. (Then CentOS-5 would always stick to the mock release that was used for CentOS-5.0...) Another idea that Red Hat would probably support is to just use the same mock version that also Red Hat uses for their releases, just to have another data point that CentOS is really 100% compatibel to RHEL. (Keeping infrastructure the same should be extended to as many parts as possible.) regards, Florian La Roche

1 0

mock-0.9.19 on CentOS5/RHEL5
by Florian La Roche 12 Nov '09

12 Nov '09

Hello, if you want to run the newest version of mock (0.9.19) with RHEL5/CentOS5, you can use a backported version from: http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/el-updates/5/SRPMS/mock-0.9.19-1.el5.src.rpm http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/el-updates/5/i386/mock-0.9.19-1.el5.noarch.rpm regards, Florian La Roche

3 2

missing packages from 5.4
by Farkas Levente 10 Nov '09

10 Nov '09

hi, it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4: celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm iasl-20061109-5.el5.src.rpm kvm-83-105.el5.src.rpm log4cpp-1.0-4.el5.src.rpm qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.el5.src.rpm qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm qpixman-0.13.3-4.el5.src.rpm qspice-0.3.0-39.el5.src.rpm it seems all x86_64 only package's source are missing:-) at the same time nautilus-sendto-1.0.1-6.el5.centos.src.rpm pango-1.14.9-6.el5.centos yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-3.el5.centos.src.rpm has no reason to be .centos since there is no changes from rhel and i also suspect etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.centos.X.rpm but as there is no src.rpm for etherboot i can't check it. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel November 2009