Hi,
Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the
present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises
the main issue ( s/w ).
We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb.
They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months
back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin
CentOS-DS / openldap based backend.
So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these
…
[View More]international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there
is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list )
- phpBB
- SMF
- Fudforum
- phorum
- fluxbb
Requirements:
- Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs )
- Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in
writing the ldap-auth portion )
- Must address the specific requirements raised by the present
www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? )
- Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good )
- Secure
- Skin'able
Nice to have:
- Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment
- responsive community :D
Things we will need to do:
- Decide on what s/w to use.
- Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted.
- Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is
a language too :D ).
- Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w
- setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org
Actions:
Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server,
once that is online we will then start by installing into our
test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them.
If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in.
I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to
track progress.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
[View Less]
Yesterday evening (Tuesday December 8, 2009) a forum thread [1] was
started by Stefan (under the ID of "gigglesworth") relating to the
above subjects.
As is well known, ELRepo provided the fasttrack packages during the
lifetime of CentOS 5.3 but following on from Karanbir's assertion that
CentOS will provide the fasttrack packages for 5.4 we, at ELRepo, have
stepped down from providing that service.
Will CentOS-devs please have a look at the above mentioned thread and
then respond, …
[View More]accordingly, to the OP.
Regards,
Alan.
[1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23695&forum=42
[View Less]
hi guys,
One of the things that came up from the last chat about the language
specific websites, was that there was no one on that call who actually
used the forums.
With the help of Akemi, I've been able to setup a meeting for the
existing english forum moderators to come together and have a chat about:
1) what we have right now
2) Whats broken
3) whats really good
4) where they would like the forums to be in the next 6 months
5) Where they would like the forums to be in the next 12 …
[View More]months
6) The idea of 'English' as being just another language
Its a bit short notice, but the meeting is setup to happen on Wednesday
9th Dec at 2300 UTC. Its the only time that worked for all concerned -
in the next few weeks period. Apart from the existing forum moderators,
anyone interested in the conversation is more than welcome to come along.
Lets all sync up at 22:50 on #centos-devel(a)irc.freenode.net and take it
from there. Also, lets try and timebox initial discussion to 40 min with
a further 10 min after that to summarise and plan future actions.
- KB
[View Less]
Hi,
I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time.
The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the
upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite
a long time.
Packages are in testing repos:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/
I'd like to ask for QA tests. This patched version passes all the
internal yum tests (aka 'make test').
Regards,
David Hrbáč
Hi,
today I noticed that yum-priorities is not anymore in the base distribution -
a fact that seems to be well documented. However the yum-utils src rpm still
builds that package.
Therefore I was wondering why yum-priorities is available in extras and not in
addons.
Basically http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General says:
> What are all the CentOS repositories (directories) and what is each one
> for?
>
> addons
> Contains packages required in order to build the main Distribution …
[View More]or
> packages produced by SRPMS built in the main Distribution, but not included
> in the main Red Hat package tree (mysql-server in CentOS-3.x falls into
> this category). Packages contained in the addons repository should be
> considered essentially a part of the core distribution, but may not be in
> the main Red Hat Package tree.
However the addons repo is completely empty for CentOS 5.4. Does that mean
addons is deprecated?
fs
[View Less]
There has been a forum thread [1], with the above subject header,
recently started by a user "BruceLee".
Both Phil Schaffner and I have (independently) attempted to explain
that the OP's request would, most probably, not be dealt with by the
CentOS project.
I write this message to ask, time permitting, if one of the core
dev-team (in no particular order: Russ, Karanbir, Tru, Ralph or
Johnny) will please post an authoritative sentence (or even paragraph)
to that thread?
Regards,
Alan.
[1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23539&forum=37#t…
While upgrading our servers to 5.4 I just noticed that the mirrorlist is
somewhat "broken" (at least for me).
For 4.8 it does work:
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?repo=updates&arch=x86_64&release=4.8
For 5.3 it also works:
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?repo=updates&arch=x86_64&release=5.3
But for 5.4 it doesn't work:
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?repo=updates&arch=x86_64&release=5.4
Is that intended? If so: how do I say "I want 5.4 and all its updats but
I don't …
[View More]want to move to 5.5 right now"
<background-info>
I know that usually one would just ask for "release=5", however - our
rpm-patch-and-upgrade-toolchain relies on the ability to pin the system
to a specific CentOS release until we're sure our boxes can be moved to
the new release. We do that by replacing $releasever in the
CentOS-Base.repo with the exact release we want to stay with.
</background-info>
Regards,
Andreas
--
Solvention
Egermannstr. 6-8
53359 Rheinbach
Tel: +49 2226 158179-0
Fax: +49 2226 158179-9
http://www.solvention.de
mailto:info@solvention.de
[View Less]
Hi,
I would like to submit a new package for inclusion in the CentOS
repositories:
Spec URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/poweradmin/poweradmin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/poweradmin/poweradmin-2.1.3-5.fc12.src.r…
Description:
Poweradmin is a friendly web-based DNS administration tool for
Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server. The interface has full support
for most of the features of PowerDNS. It has full support for
all zone types ( master, native and slave), for …
[View More]supermasters
for automatic provisioning of slave zones, full support for IPv6
and comes with multi-language support. See feature list for all
features.
rpmlint outputs 2 warnings, both of which i can explain:
poweradmin.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/var/www/html/poweradmin/locale/nl_NL/LC_MESSAGES/messages.mo
poweradmin.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
The locale file belongs to the poweradmin package and is not meant for
system-wide usage. The rm command is to remove the ./install dir when upgrading
the package. If it's not removed, PowerAdmin won't function properly anymore.
Having never submitted anything for CentOS yet, i welcome all input.
Kind regards,
--
Léon
[View Less]
List members,
I am not sure if it is just I, but there seem to be a prevalent amount
of elitism on this list, and as such I think this is a good time to
make note of it in the light of working to accept donations.
It will hopefully be instructive to the some several folks (not all of
course, but a select segment) of people on this list that are
regularly curt, abrupt, condescending, and dismissive of those asking
queries of the list to take stock of the fact that their alienating
…
[View More]effect is long term and not soon forgotten. Surely, this will impact
one's choice to donate.
Thus, if the greater CentOS community is going to try to accept
donations from those that see extremely righteous value in their work,
why spoil that point of view by proving inarguably a contrarian
outlook by treating people on this list dismissively?
I have no objection to elitism, just noting that sometimes it is
better to be a non-elitist with donations, that an elitist with less
donations.
Just a word to those that think they are wise, but really need to become wise.
V/R,
Stuart
[View Less]